Advertisement

Journal of Educational Change

, Volume 15, Issue 3, pp 281–301 | Cite as

Gender discourse in an Arab-Muslim high school in Israel: Ethnographic case study

  • Khalid Arar
Article

Abstract

Although the school constitutes a key cultural arena for the production and reproduction of gender identities, few studies have addressed gender discourse in educational institutions in developing societies. Such studies are especially sparse in Arab society in Israel. This study goes some way to addressing what is often absent from many sociological portrayals of young pupils and schools, since it uses the words of the teachers and students to clarify the construction of gender discourse in an Arab high school in Israel. It points to activities considered to be gendered; identifying distinctions between the sexes (if they exist) in the staff’s and students’ perceptions of educational experiences at school; and examining to what extent school authority is seen as masculine and whether the school promotes debate and socialization for equality between the sexes. The research employed an inductive methodology including ethnographic data-collection techniques: observations, focus group interviews of students and in-depth personal interviews with school role-holders. Findings indicate that a covert learning program influences gender construction in the Arab school, a program intended to maintain the existing hegemonic social hierarchy. Patriarchal control of the adolescents’ agenda appears weakened and a generation gap separates teachers from students. Voices of students and younger staff advocate deconstruction of the traditional structure and norms of Arab society, suggesting a new agenda, promoting egalitarian discourse, and new personal and collective identities. Conclusions are drawn concerning the school’s role in the deconstruction of the existing male hegemony, the promotion of gender equity. The paper provides ethnographic insights concerning the Arab high school in Israel, pointing up a need for empathetic educator-student dialogue, that will promote egalitarian perceptions and practices, listen to the voice of the younger generation and challenge residual social norms of Arab Muslim society. The findings indicate that a more open gender discourse could offer symbolic resources and/or practical tools to enhance the every-day implementation of equity in the school. The paper also suggests some new research directions.

Keywords

Gender discourse Equity Management High school Learning program Muslims Israel 

References

  1. Abu-Baker, K. (2008). Welfare, modernity and tradition: Palestinian women in Israel cope with changes in their life settings. In A. Manaa, & R. Gara (Eds.), The Arab society book 2 (pp. 359–384). Jerusalem: Van Leer Institute and Kibbutz Meuhad Publications. [Hebrew].Google Scholar
  2. Abu-Rabia-Queder, S., & Arar, K. (2011). Gender and higher education in different national spaces: Palestinian students in Israeli and Jordanian universities. Compare, A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 41(3), 353–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Al-Haj, M. (1995). Education among the Arabs in Israel: Social control and change. Jerusalem. New York: University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Apple, M., Au, W., & Gandin, L. A. (2009). The Routledge international handbook of critical education (pp. 3–19). New York: Routlege.Google Scholar
  5. Arar, K. (2006). Attitudes of Arab high-school pupils towards physical education (dissertation for PhD, Anglia Ruskin University).Google Scholar
  6. Arar, K. (2010). I made it: Israeli-Palestinian women principals as leaders. Journal of Education, Business and Society. [Special issue] Contemporary Middle Eastern Issues, 3(4):315–330.Google Scholar
  7. Arar, K. (2011). Trapped between two worlds-Muslim Palestinian women from Israel In Jordanian universities: New identity and the price it demands. Social Identities, 17(5), 625–642.Google Scholar
  8. Arar, K. (2014). Discourse of equity and social justice in Muslim high school in Israel. In F. Salili & R. Hossain (Eds.), Growing up between two cultures: Issues and problems of Muslim children (pp. 186–207). New York: Information Age.Google Scholar
  9. Arar, K., & Abu-Asbahm, K. (2013). Not just location: Attitudes and perceptions of education system administrators in local Arab government. International Journal of Educational Management, 27(1), 54–73.Google Scholar
  10. Arar, K., & Mustafa, M. (2011). Access to higher education for the Palestinians in Israel. Education, Education Business and Society: Contemporary Middle Eastern Issues, 4(3), 207–228.Google Scholar
  11. Arar, K., & Oplatka, I. (2011). Gender, culture, ethnicity and leadership perceptions. Presented at BELMAS Annual International Conference, British Educational Leadership, Management and Administration Society, Robinson Executive Conference Centre, Wyboston Lakes, 8th–10th July.Google Scholar
  12. Arar, K., & Oplatka, I. (2014). Muslim and Jewish teachers’ conceptions of the male school principal’s masculinity: Insights into cultural and social distinctions in principal-teacher relations. Men and Masculinity. 1–21. doi: 10.1177/1097184X13516961.
  13. Arar, K., Shapira, T., Azaize, F., & Hertz-Lazarowitz, R. (2013). Arab women in leadership and management. New York: Palgrave Mcmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Arnon, M. (2000). Gender relations and schooling in the new century: Conflicts and challenges. Compare, 30(3), 293–302.Google Scholar
  15. Arnot, M. (2000). Gendered relations and schooling in new century conflicts and challenges. Compare, 30(3), 293–302.Google Scholar
  16. Arnot, M. (2010). Rethinking gendered regulations and resistance in education. Gender and Education, 22(6), 595–601.Google Scholar
  17. Arnot, M., David, M., & Weiner, G. (1999). Closing up the gender gap: Postwar education and social change. Cambrige: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  18. Blackmore, J. (1999). Troubling women: Feminism, leadership, and educational change. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Calas, M. B., & Smircich, L. (1992). Rewriting gender into organizational theorizing: Directions from feminist perspectives. In M. Reed & M. Hughes (Eds.), Rethinking organizations. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  21. Central Bureau of Statistics. (2009). Statistical abstract of Israel 2008. Population estimates by population group, 2.1. Jerusalem: CBS. www.cbs.gov.il/shnaton60/st02_01.pdf.
  22. Clapton, G., Cree, V. E., Allan, M., Edwards, R., Forbes, R., Irwin, M., et al. (2006). Grasping the nettle: Integrating learning practice revisited and re-imagined. Social Work Education, 25(6), 645–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Connell, R. (2005). Masculinities. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  24. Dahan-Caleb, H. (2006). Oriental feminism, post-colonialism and globalization. Democratic Culture, 10, 135–161. [Hebrew].Google Scholar
  25. Edwards, T. (2006). Cultures and masculinities. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Fletcher, J. (2001). Disappearing acts: Gender, power and relational practice at work. Cambridge, MA: Mets Press.Google Scholar
  27. Foucault, M. (1980). Power and knowledge. Brighton: Harvester Press.Google Scholar
  28. Francis, B. (2010). Re-theorising gender: female masculinity and male femininity in the classroom? Gender and Education, 22(5), 477–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Fuller, K. (2011). Learning gendered leadership: A case study of leadership apprenticeship. Paper presented at BELMAS annual international conference, 9th July, England: Wybston Lakes.Google Scholar
  30. Golan-Agnon, D. (2006). Separate but not equal: Discrimination against Palestinian Arab students in Israel. American Behavioral Scientist, 49, 1075–84.Google Scholar
  31. Gregory, E. (2005). Introduction: Tracing the steps. In J. Conteh, E. Gregory, C. Kearney, & A. Mor-Sommerfeld (Eds.), On writing educational ethnographies the art of collusion (pp. 9–26). London: Trentham Books.Google Scholar
  32. Grogan, M., & Shakeshaft, C. (2011). Women and educational leadership. California: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  33. Halperin-Kaddari, R. (2003). Women in Israel: A state of their own, a volume. In B. B. Lockwood Jr (Ed.), Pennsylvania studies in human rights (2007). University of Pennsylvania: Penn Press.Google Scholar
  34. Hey, V., & Bradford, S. (2004). The return of the repressed? The gender politics of the emergent forms of professionalism in education. Journal of Education Policy, 19(6), 691–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Holmes, M. (2007). What is gender? London: Sage.Google Scholar
  36. Khamaise, R. (2009). The book of Arab society 3. Jerusalem: Van Leer Institute. [Hebrew].Google Scholar
  37. Khattab, N. (2006). Social capital, student’s perceptions and educational aspirations among Palestinian students in Israel. Research in Education, 68, 77–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kirdar, S. (2006). The development of women’s education in the Arab world. In R. Griffin (Ed.), Education in the Muslim world: Different perspectives (pp. 191–2010). Oxford: Oxford Symposium Books.Google Scholar
  39. Kuzmic, J. J. (2000). Textbooks, knowledge, and masculinity. In N. Lesko (Ed.), Masculinities at school (pp. 105–126). Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Laker, A., Laker, G., & Lea, S. (2003). School experience. Sport, Education and Society, 8(1), 73–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lingard, B. (2003). Where to in gender policy in education after recuperative masculinity politics? International Journal of Inclusive Education, 7(1), 33–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Mazawi, A. (1999). Concentrated disadvantage and access to educational credentials in Arab and Jewish localities in Israel. British Educational Research Journal, 25(3), 335–370.Google Scholar
  43. Metcalf, B., & Linstead, A. (2003). Gendering teamwork: Re-writing the feminine. Gender Work and Organization, 10(1), 94–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Miller, G., & Fox, K. (2006). Building bridges: The possibility of analytical dialogue between ethnography, conversation analysis and Foucault. In D. Silverman (Ed.), Qualitative research: Theory, method and practice (pp. 35–55). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  45. Nespor, J. (2000). Topologies of masculinity. In N. Lesko (Ed.), Masculinities at school (Vol. 11, pp. 27–48). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.Google Scholar
  46. Noddings, N. (2003). Caring: A feminine approach to ethics and moral education. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  47. Oplatka, I. (2004). The principalship in developing countries: Context, characteristics and reality. Comparative Education, 40(3), 427–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation methods (2nd ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  49. Procter, S., & Mueller, F. (Eds.). (2000). Team working: Issues, concepts and problems. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  50. Renold, E. (2000). Coming out: Gender, (hetro) sexuality and the primary school. Gender and Education, 12(3), 309–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Renold, E., & Allan, A. (2006). Bright and beautiful: High achieving girls, ambivalent femininities and the feminization of success. Discourse: Studies in Cultural Politics of Education, 27, 547–573.Google Scholar
  52. Ringrose, J., & Renold, E. (2010). Normative cruelties and gender deviants: The performative effects of bully discourses for girls and boys in school. British Educational Research Journal, 36(4), 573–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Ringrose, J., & Renold, E. (2012). Slut-shaming, girl power and ‘sexualities’: Thinking through the politics of international SlutWalks with teen girls. Gender and Education, 24(3), 333–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Shah, S. (2010). Re-thinking educational leadership: Exploring the impact of cultural and belief system. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 13(1), 27–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Sharan, M. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  56. Skrla, L. (2000). The social construction of gender in the superintendency. Journal of Education Policy, 15(3), 293–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Stake, R. E. (2005). Qualitative case studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 366–443). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  58. Shapira, T., Arar, K., & Azaiza F. (2010). Arab women principals’ empowerment and leadership in Israel. Journal of Educational Administration. [Special issue] Globalization: Expanding horizons in women’s leadership 48(6), 704–715.Google Scholar
  59. Van Houtte, M. (2004). Gender context of the school and study culture, or how the presence of girls affects the achievement of boys. Educational Studies, 30(4), 5–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Weaver-Hightower, M. (2009). Masculinity and education. In M. Apple, W. Au, & L. A. Gandin (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of critical education (pp. 163–176). New York: Routlege.Google Scholar
  61. Wolcott, H. (2008). Ethnography or educational travel writing. In Y. Zou, & E. H. Trueba (2002) (Eds.), Ethnography and schools (pp. 27–48). New York: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  62. Wong, K. C., Lam, R., & Ho, L. M. (2002). The effects of schooling in gender differences. British Educational Research Journal, 28(6), 432–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Younger, M., & Cobbett, M. (2012). Gender experiences of schooling: Dynamics and inequalities within four Caribbean secondary schools. Paper presented at ECER 2012, The Need for Educational Research to Champion Freedom, Education and Development for All, Cadiz, 20th September.Google Scholar
  64. Zoe, Y., & Trueba, E. H. (Eds.). (2002). Ethnography and schools (pp. 27–48). New York: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate School of EducationThe Center for Academic StudiesOr-YehudaIsrael

Personalised recommendations