Advertisement

Journal of Educational Change

, Volume 13, Issue 3, pp 289–310 | Cite as

Moving knowledge around: Strategies for fostering equity within educational systems

  • Mel Ainscow
Article

Abstract

This paper describes and analyses the work of a large scale improvement project in England in order to find more effective ways of fostering equity within education systems. The project involved an approach based on an analysis of local context, and used processes of networking and collaboration in order to make better use of available expertise. Reflecting on the impact and difficulties involved in using such an approach, the paper draws out lessons that may be relevant to other contexts. Consideration is also given to the implications for policy makers, practitioners and community stakeholders.

Keywords

Educational equity Contextual analysis Networking and collaboration Social capital 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The work described in this paper is the product of the efforts and creativity of many colleagues in the schools, local authorities and communities of Greater Manchester. Particular thanks must go to the splendid team of advisers and civil servants who worked with me on the project. Their efforts were in themselves a demonstration of the power of collaboration. I would also like to acknowledge the contributions of my colleagues Chris Chapman, Alan Dyson, Peter Farrell, Denis Mongon and Mel West who acted as critical friends throughout the project and, in so doing, contributed many ideas to the analysis presented in the paper.

References

  1. Ainscow, M. (1999). Understanding the development of inclusive schools. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Ainscow, M. (2010). Achieving excellence and equity: Reflections on the development of practices in one local district over 10 years. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 21(1), 75–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ainscow, M., Booth, T., Dyson, A., Farrell, P., Frankham, J., Gallannaugh, F., et al. (2006) Improving schools, developing inclusion. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Ainscow, M., Dyson, A., Goldrick, S., & West, M. (2012) Developing equitable education systems. London: Routledge (in press).Google Scholar
  5. Ainscow, M., & Howes, A. (2007). Working together to improve urban secondary schools: A study of practice in one city. School Leadership and Management, 27(3), 285–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ainscow, M., Muijs, D., & West, M. (2006a). Collaboration as a strategy for improving schools in challenging circumstances. Improving Schools, 9(3), 192–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ainscow, M., & West, M. (Eds.). (2006b). Improving urban schools: Leadership and collaboration. Open University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Anyon, J. (1997). Ghetto schooling: A political economy of urban educational reform. New York: Teachers College.Google Scholar
  9. Ball, S. J. (2010). New class inequalities in education. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 30(3/4), 155–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Benn, M., & Millar, F. (2006). A comprehensive future: Quality and equality for all of our children. London: Compass.Google Scholar
  11. Brighouse, T. (2007). The London challenge—a personal view. In T. Brighouse & L. Fullick (Eds.), Education in a global city. London: Institute of Education Bedford Way Papers.Google Scholar
  12. Chenoweth, K. (2007). It’s being done: Academic success in unexpected schools. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.Google Scholar
  13. Crowther, D., Cummings, C., Dyson, A., & Millward, A. (2003). Schools and area regeneration. Bristol: The Policy Press.Google Scholar
  14. Dobbie, W., & Fryer, R. G. (2009). Are high-quality schools enough to close the achievement gap? Evidence from a bold social experiment in Harlem. Cambridge: Harvard University.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dyson, A., & Raffo, C. (2007). Education and disadvantage: The role of community-orientated schools. Oxford Review of Education, 33(3), 297–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fryer, R., & Levitt, S. (2004). Understanding the black-white test score gap in the first two years of school. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 86(2), 447–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Giroux, H. A., & Schmidt, M. (2004). Closing the achievement gap: A metaphor for children left behind. Journal of Educational Change, 5, 213–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gorrard, S. (2008). Who is missing from higher education? Cambridge Journal of Education, 38(3), 421–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gray, J. (2010). Probing the limits of systemic reform: The English case. In A. Hargreaves, A. Lieberman, M. Fullan, & D. Hopkins (Eds.), Second international of educational change. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  20. Hargreaves, D. H. (2003). Leadership for transformation within the London Challenge. Annual lecture at the London Leadership Centre, 19 May 2003.Google Scholar
  21. Hargreaves, D. H. (2010). Creating a self-improving school system. Nottingham: National College for Leadership of Schools and Children’s services.Google Scholar
  22. Hopkins, D. (2007). Every school a great school: Realizing the potential of system leadership. Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Hopkins, D., Reynolds, D., & Gray, J. (2005). School improvement lessons from research. London: DfES.Google Scholar
  24. Kerr, K., & West, M. (Eds.) (2010). Social inequality: Can schools narrow the gap? Macclesfield: British Education Research Association, Insight 2.Google Scholar
  25. Levin, B. (2005). Thinking about improvements in schools in challenging circumstances. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, April.Google Scholar
  26. Lima, J. A. (2008). Thinking more deeply about networks in education. Journal of Educational Change, 11(1), 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lipman, P. (2004). High stakes education: Inequality, globalisation and urban school reform. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Meadows, S., Herrick, D., & Feiler, A. (2007). Improvements in national test reading scores at Key Stage 1: Grade inflation or better achievement? British Educational Research Journal, 33(1), 47–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mourshed, M., Chijioke, C., & Barber, M. (2010). How the world’s most improved school systems keep getting better. London: McKinsey & Company.Google Scholar
  30. Mulford, B. (2007). Building social capital in professional learning communities: Importance, challenges and a way forward. In L. Stoll & K. Seashore Louis (Eds.), Professional learning communities: Divergence, depth and dilemmas. London: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  31. OECD. (2007). No more failures: Ten steps to equity in education. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  32. OECD. (2010). PISA 2009 results: Overcoming social background—equity in learning opportunities and outcomes (Vol. II). Paris: OECD.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Phillips, M., Crouse, J., & Ralph, J. (1998). Does the black-white test score gap widen after children enter school? In Christopher. Jencks & Meredith. Phillips (Eds.), The black-white test score gap. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institute.Google Scholar
  34. Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  35. Robson, B., Deas, I., & Lymperopoulou, K. (2009). Schools and pupil performance in Greater Manchester: A key driver of social polarization. University of Manchester report.Google Scholar
  36. Sammons, P. (2007). School effectiveness and equity: Making connections. Reading: CfBT.Google Scholar
  37. Sammons, P. (2008). Zero tolerance of failure and New Labour approsches to school improvement in England. Oxford Review of Education, 34(6), 651–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Simon, H. (1978). Rationality as process and as product of thought. The American Economic Review, 68(2), 1–16.Google Scholar
  39. Springfield, S. (1995). Attempting to improve students’ learning through innovative programs—the case for schools evolving into high reliability organizations. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 6(1), 67–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Tymms, P. (2004). Are standards rising in British primary schools? British Educational Research Journal, 30(4), 477–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. UNESCO. (2010). EFA global monitoring report: Reaching the marginalized. Paris: UNESCO/Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  42. West, M., Ainscow, M., & Stanford, J. (2005). Sustaining improvement in schools in challenging circumstances: a study of successful practice. School Leadership and Management, 25(1), 77–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Whitehurst, G. J., & Croft, M. (2010). The Harlem children’s zone, promise neighborhoods, and the broader, bolder approach to education. Washington: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
  44. Whitty, G. (2010). Marketization and post-markeyization in education. In A. Hargreaves, A. Lieberman, M. Fullan, & D. Hopkins (Eds.), Second international of educational change. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  45. Wilkinson, R., & Pickett, K. (2009). The spirit level. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Equity in EducationUniversity of ManchesterManchesterUK

Personalised recommendations