Advertisement

Journal of Educational Change

, Volume 10, Issue 4, pp 365–391 | Cite as

What is successful adaptation of lesson study in the US?

  • Rebecca R. Perry
  • Catherine C. Lewis
Article

Abstract

This paper features a case study of one US K-8 school district pioneering the use of “lesson study,” a teacher professional development approach adapted from Japan. The case explores events that occurred in the district over more than 4 years (Spring 2000–Fall 2004) as lesson study spread nationally and within the district. We document four categories of changes that occurred in the district’s lesson study approach, and describe some of the early consequences of these changes as well as conditions that enabled the changes to occur. We argue that this case illustrates much of what we would hope to see in a maturing lesson study effort, and conclude that other US sites may need to go through similar changes, organize similar supports, and persist in their learning about lesson study to successfully adapt this model to their local contexts.

Keywords

Organizational change Professional development Educational reform 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This material is based upon research supported by the National Science Foundation under grants REC 9814967 and REC 0207259. Additionally, revisions to the original manuscript submission were informed by work conducted for and supported by the MacArthur-Spencer Meta-Study. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation or the MacArthur-Spencer Meta-Study project. The authors wish to thank the many practitioners involved in the research as well as Mary Kay Stein and Cynthia Coburn for their formative feedback on the substance of the manuscript.

References

  1. Ball, D. L. (2002). What do we believe about teacher learning and how can we learn with and from our beliefs? In D. S. Mewborn, et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the twenty-fourth annual meeting of the North American chapter of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education. Columbus, OH: ERIC Clearinghouse for Mathematics, Science, and Environmental Education, 3–19.Google Scholar
  2. Ball, D. L., & Cohen, D. K. (1999). Developing practice, developing practitioners: Toward a practice-based theory of professional education. In G. Sykes & L. Darling-Hammond (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 3–32). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  3. Ball, D. L., & Cohen, R. B. (2006). Learning mathematics for teaching. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Education Research Association, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  4. Ball, D. L., Hill, H. C., & Bass, H. (2005). Knowing mathematics for teaching: Who knows mathematics well enough to teach third grade, and how can we decide? American Educator, 29(3), 14–17, 20–22, 43–46.Google Scholar
  5. Bauld, L., & Hurd, J. (2004). A mathematically powerful classroom…a product of lesson study. Presentation at the California Mathematics Council, Asilomar, CA.Google Scholar
  6. Berman, P., & McLaughlin, M. W. (1978). Federal programs supporting educational change: Vol. VII, factors affecting implementation and continuation. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.Google Scholar
  7. Borasi, R., & Fonzi, J. (2002). Professional development that supports school mathematics reform (foundations monograph, vol. 3). Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.Google Scholar
  8. Borko, H., Wolf, S. A., Simone, G., & Uchiyama, K. P. (2003). Schools in transition: Reform efforts and school capacity in Washington state. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25(2), 171–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brown, A. L., & Campione, J. C. (1996). Psychological theory and the design of innovative learning environments: On procedures, principles, and systems. In L. Schauble & R. Glaser (Eds.), Innovations in learning: New environments for education (pp. 289–325). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  10. Chen, H. (1990). Theory-driven evaluations. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  11. Coburn, C. E. (2003). Rethinking scale: Moving beyond numbers to deep and lasting change. Educational Researcher, 32(6), 3–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cohen, D. K. (1990). A revolution in one classroom: The case of Mrs. Oublier. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 12(3), 327–345.Google Scholar
  13. Cohen, D. K., & Ball, D. L (1990). Relations between policy and practice. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 12(3), 249–256.Google Scholar
  14. Cohen, D. K., & Hill, H. C. (2001). Learning policy: When state education reform works. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Cooper, R., Slavin, R. E., & Madden, N. (1998). Success for all: Improving the quality of implementation of whole-school change through the use of a national reform network. Education and Urban Society, 30(3), 385–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cuban, L. (1990). Reforming again, again, and again. Educational Researcher, 19(1), 3–13.Google Scholar
  17. Cuban, L. (1998). How schools change reforms: Redefining reform success and failure. Teachers College Record, 99(3), 453–477.Google Scholar
  18. Darling-Hammond, L., & McLaughlin, M. W. (1996). Policies that support professional development in an era of reform. In M. W. McLaughlin & I. Oberman (Eds.), Teacher learning: New policies, new practices (pp. 202–218). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  19. Datnow, A., Borman, G., & Stringfield, S. (2000). School reform through a highly specified curriculum: Implementation and effects of the Core Knowledge Sequence. The Elementary School Journal, 101(2), 167–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Datnow, A., Hubbard, L., & Mehan, H. (2002). Extending educational reform: From one school to many. London: Routledge Falmer.Google Scholar
  21. Elmore, R. F., & McLaughlin, M. W. (1988). Steady work: Policy, practice and the reform of American education. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.Google Scholar
  22. Fernandez, C., & Yoshida, M. (2004). Lesson study: A case of a Japanese approach to improving instruction through school-based teacher development. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  23. Fernandez, C., Cannon, J., & Chokshi, S. (2003). A U.S.-Japan lesson study collaborative reveals critical lenses for examining practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19(2), 171–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fernandez, C., Chokshi, S., Cannon, J., & Yoshida, M. (2001). Learning about lesson study in the United States. In E. Beauchamp (Ed.), New and old voices on Japanese education. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
  25. Franke, M. L., Carpenter, T., Fennema, E., Ansell, E., & Behrend, J. (1998). Understanding teachers’ self-sustaining, generative change in the context of professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education 14(1), 67–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Franke, M. L., Carpenter, T. P., Levi, L., & Fennema, E. (2001). Capturing teachers’ generative change: A follow-up study of professional development in mathematics. American Educational Research Journal, 38(3), 653–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fullan, M. G. (1993). Change forces: Probing the depths of educational reform. Bristol, PA: The Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  28. Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 915–945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Germain-McCarthy, Y. (2001). Bringing the NCTM standards to life: Exemplary practices for middle schools. Larchmont, NY: Eye on Education.Google Scholar
  30. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
  31. Grossman, P., Wineburg, S., & Woolworth, S. (2001). Toward a theory of teacher community. Teachers College Record, 103(6), 942–1012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hargreaves, A., & Fink, D. (2003). Sustaining leadership. Phi Delta Kappan, 84(9), 693–700.Google Scholar
  33. Hawley, W. D., & Valli, L. (1999). The essentials of effective professional development: A new consensus. In G. Sykes & L. Darling-Hammond (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 127–150). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  34. Hiebert, J., Gallimore, R., & Stigler, J. W. (2002). A knowledge base for the teaching profession: What would it look like and how can we get one? Educational Researcher, 31(5), 3–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hill, H. C., & Ball, D. L. (2004). Learning mathematics for teaching: Results from California’s Mathematics Professional Development Institutes. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 35(5), 330–351.Google Scholar
  36. Hurd, J., & Licciardo-Musso, L. (2005). Lesson Study: Teacher led professional development in literacy instruction. Language Arts, 82(5), 388–395.Google Scholar
  37. Knapp, M. (1997). Between systemic reforms and the mathematics and science classroom: The dynamics of innovation, implementation, and professional learning. Review of Educational Research, 67, 227–266.Google Scholar
  38. Kruse, S., Louis, K. S., & Bryk, A. (1994). Building professional community in schools. Issues in Restructuring Schools, 6, 3–6.Google Scholar
  39. Learned, M., & Keadle, M. (2004). Got lesson study? Presentation at the California Mathematics Council, Asilomar, CA.Google Scholar
  40. Lesh, R., Hoover, M., Hole, B., Kelly, A., & Post, T. (2000). Principles for developing thought-revealing activities for students and teachers. In A. E. Kelly & R. Lesh (Eds.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 591–646). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  41. Lewis, C. (2002a). Does lesson study have a future in the United States? Nagoya Journal of Education and Human Development 1(1), 1–23.Google Scholar
  42. Lewis, C. (2002b). Lesson study: A handbook of teacher-led instructional change. Philadelphia, PA: Research for Better Schools.Google Scholar
  43. Lewis, C., & Tsuchida, I. (1997). Planned educational change in Japan: The shift to student-centered elementary science. Journal of Education Policy, 12(5), 313–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lewis, C., & Tsuchida, I. (1998). A lesson is like a swiftly flowing river: Research lessons and the improvement of Japanese education. American Educator, 14–17, 50–52.Google Scholar
  45. Lewis, C., Perry, R., & Friedkin, S. (2007). Coherent mathematics curriculum: Bridging the worlds of policy and practice. Unpublished manuscript, Mills College.Google Scholar
  46. Lewis, C., Perry, R., & Hurd, J. (2004). A deeper look at lesson study. Educational Leadership, 61(5), 18–22.Google Scholar
  47. Lewis, C., Perry, R., Hurd, J., & O’Connell, M. P. (2006). Lesson study comes of age in North America. Phi Delta Kappan, 88(4), 273–281.Google Scholar
  48. Lewis, C., Perry, R., & Murata, A. (2004). What counts as evidence of learning from practice? Collaborative critique of lesson study research methods. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.Google Scholar
  49. Lewis, C., Perry, R., & Murata, A. (2006). How should research contribute to instructional improvement? The case of lesson study. Educational Researcher, 35(3), 3–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Lieberman, A., & Wood, D. (2002). Inside the national writing project: Connecting network learning and classroom teaching. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  51. Linn, M., & His, S. (2000). Computers, teachers, peers: Science learning partners. Mahwah, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  52. Little, J. W. (1993). Teachers’ professional development in a climate of education reform. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 15(2), 129–151.Google Scholar
  53. Loucks-Horsley, S., Love, N., Stiles, K. E., Mundry, S., & Hewson, P. W. (2003). Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press, Inc.Google Scholar
  54. Lord, B. (1994). Teachers’ professional development: Critical colleagueship and the role of professional communities. In N. Cobb (Ed.), The future of education perspectives on national standards in America (pp. 175–204). New York: College Board.Google Scholar
  55. McLaughlin, M. W. (1987). Learning from experience: Lessons from policy implementation. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 9(2), 171–178.Google Scholar
  56. McLaughlin, M. W., & Mitra, D. (2001). Theory-based change and change-based theory: Going deeper and going broader. Journal of Educational Change, 2(4), 301–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. McLaughlin, M. W., & Talbert, J. E. (1993). Contexts that matter for teaching and learning: Strategic opportunities for meeting the nation’s educational goals. Stanford University: Center for Research on the Context of Secondary School Teaching.Google Scholar
  58. Mills College Lesson Study Group. (2005). How many seats? (DVD) Oakland, CA: Mills College.Google Scholar
  59. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  60. Murata, A. (2003). Teacher learning and lesson study: Developing efficacy through experiencing student learning. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the School Science and Mathematics Association, Columbus, OH.Google Scholar
  61. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (2001). Navigations-steering through principles and standards. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.Google Scholar
  62. National Research Council. (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. In J. Kilpatrick, J. Swafford, & B. Findell (Eds.), Mathematics learning study committee, center for education, division of behavioral and social sciences and education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  63. National Research Council. (2002). Studying classroom teaching as a medium for professional development. Proceedings of a U.S.—Japan Workshop. In H. Bass, Z. P. Usiskin, & G. Burrill (Eds.), Mathematical sciences education board division of behavioral and social sciences and education U.S. national commission on mathematics instruction international organizations board. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  64. Newman, F. M., King, M. B., & Youngs, P. (2000). Professional development that addresses school capacity: Lessons from urban elementary schools. American Journal of Education, 108, 259–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Perry, R. R. (1996). The role of teachers’ professional communities in the implementation of California mathematics reform. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University.Google Scholar
  66. Perry, R., & Lewis, C. (2006). A perfect storm: Using lesson study to build and share professional knowledge. Unpublished manuscript prepared for the MacArthur Meta-Study, Mills College.Google Scholar
  67. Perry, R., Lewis, C., & Akiba, M. (2002). Lesson study in the Bay Area School District. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.Google Scholar
  68. Perry, R., Lewis, C., & Murata, A. (2003). Lesson study and teachers’ knowledge development: Collaborative critique of a research model and methods. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
  69. Putnam, R., & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher, 29(1), 4–15.Google Scholar
  70. Remillard, J. T., & Bryans, M. B. (2004). Teachers’ orientations toward mathematics curriculum materials: Implications for teacher learning. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 35(5), 352–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Sarason, S. B. (1990). The predictable failure of educational reform: Can we change course before it’s too late? San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  72. Schmidt, W., McKnight, C., & Raizen, S. (1997). A splintered vision: An investigation of US mathematics and science education. Kluwer: Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  73. Schön, D. A. (1987). The reflective turn: Case studies in and on educational practice. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  74. Shulman, L. S. (1983). Autonomy and obligation: The remote control of teaching. In L. S. Shulman & G. Sykes (Eds.), Handbook of teaching and policy (pp. 484–504). New York: Longman.Google Scholar
  75. Smith, M. S. (2001). Practice-based professional development for teachers of mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.Google Scholar
  76. Smith, M. S., & O’Day, J. (1990). Systemic school reform. In S. H. Fuhrman & B. Malen (Eds.), The politics of curriculum and testing; 1990 yearbook of the politics of education association (pp. 233–267). London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  77. Sparks, D., & Hirsh, S. (1997). A new vision for staff development. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.Google Scholar
  78. Spillane, J. P., Diamond, J. B., & Jita, L. (2003). Leading instruction: The distribution of leadership for instruction. [Electronic version]. Retrieved December 17, 2004 from the Northwestern University Distributed Leadership web site: http://dls.sesp.northwestern.edu/index.php?show=papers.
  79. Stigler, J. W., & Hiebert, J. (1999). The teaching gap: Best ideas from the world’s teachers for improving education in the classroom. New York: Summit Books.Google Scholar
  80. Sykes, G. (1996). Reform of and as professional development. Phi Delta Kappan, 77, 465–467.Google Scholar
  81. Sykes, G. (1999). Introduction: Teaching as the learning profession. In G. Sykes & L. Darling-Hammond (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. xv–xxiii). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  82. Takahashi, A. (2003). Lesson study overview: Three major types of lesson study. Presentation prepared for Global Education Resources Lesson Study Immersion Program in Japan.Google Scholar
  83. Tharp, R. G., & Gallimore, R. (1988). Rousing minds to life: Teaching, learning, and schooling in social context. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  84. Tyack, D., & Cuban, L. (1995). Tinkering toward utopia. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  85. Wang-Iverson, P., Liptak, L., & Jackson, W. (2000). Journey beyond TIMSS: Rethinking professional development. Paper presented at the International Conference on Mathematics Education, Hangzhou, China.Google Scholar
  86. Weeks, D. J. (2001). Creating happy memories through lesson study. Northwest Teacher, 2(2), 6–11.Google Scholar
  87. Yoshida, M. (1999). Lesson study: A case study of a Japanese approach to improving instruction through school-based teacher development. Doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of EducationMills CollegeOaklandUSA

Personalised recommendations