Skip to main content
Log in

Antecedent-contained clausal argument ellipsis

  • Published:
Journal of East Asian Linguistics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to argue for a particular analysis of null clausal arguments in terms of ellipsis. It is first illustrated that null clausal arguments have underlying syntactic structures that are subject to ellipsis. The main and novel observation for this claim is that null clausal arguments exhibit the effect of the parallelism constraint that other ellipsis constructions like verb phrase ellipsis are also subject to, along the line of Takahashi (Proceedings of FAJL 6: formal approaches to Japanese linguistics, MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, Cambridge, pp 203–213, 2013). It then examines a hitherto unexplored construction, called antecedent-contained clausal argument ellipsis, where a null clausal argument appears to be properly contained by its antecedent. Although the construction can be readily accommodated by assuming the ellipsis process that directly elides arguments (argument ellipsis), it raises serious difficulties for its alternative analysis that employs the ellipsis process targeting a VP whose head has evacuated it (verb-stranding VP-ellipsis). This paper thus provides a novel case where the argument ellipsis analysis is required, no matter how well the verb-stranding VP-ellipsis analysis accommodates other null argument phenomena.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abe, Jun. 1999. On directionality of movement: A case of Japanese right dislocation. Unpublished ms., Nagoya University.

  • Abe, Jun, and Hiroto Hoshi. 1999. A generalized rightward movement analysis of antecedent contained deletion. Journal of Linguistics 35: 451–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baltin, Mark. 1987. Do antecedent-contained deletions exist? Linguistic Inquiry 18: 579–595.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chung, Sandra, William Ladusaw, and James McCloskey. 1995. Sluicing and logical form. Natural Language Semantics 3: 239–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung, Sandra, William A. Ladusaw, and James McCloskey. 2011. “Sluicing(:) Between structure and inference.” In Representing language: Essays in honor of Judith Aissen, ed. Rodrigo Gutiérrez-Bravo, Line Mikkelsen, and Eric Potsdam, 31–50. California Digital Library eScholarship Repository. Santa Cruz: University of California, Santa Cruz, Linguistic Research Center.

  • Doron, Edit. 1999. V-movement and VP ellipsis. In Fragments: Studies in ellipsis and gapping, ed. Shalom Lappin and Elabbas Benmamoun, 124–140. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiengo, Robert, and Robert May. 1994. Indices and identity. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, Danny. 2002. Antecedent-contained deletion and the copy theory of movement. Linguistic Inquiry 33: 63–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, Danny, and Howard Lasnik. 2003. Successive-cyclic movement and island repair: The difference between sluicing and VP-ellipsis. Linguistic Inquiry 34: 143–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Funakoshi, Kenshi. 2012. On headless XP-movement/ellipsis. Linguistic Inquiry 43: 519–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Funakoshi, Kenshi. 2014. Syntactic head movement and its consequences, Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Maryland.

  • Funakoshi, Kenshi. 2016. Verb-stranding verb phrase ellipsis in Japanese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 25: 113–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, Lotus. 2005. Verb-stranding VP-ellipsis: A cross-linguistic study, Ph.D. Dissertation. McGill University.

  • Gribanova, Vera. 2013a. Verb-stranding verb phrase ellipsis and the structure of the Russian verbal complex. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 31: 91–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gribanova, Vera. 2013b. A new argument for verb-stranding verb phrase ellipsis. Linguistic Inquiry 44: 145–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hiraiwa, Ken, and Shinichiro Ishihara. 2012. Syntactic metamorphosis: Clefts, sluicing, and in situ focus in Japanese. Syntax 15: 142–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoji, Hajime. 1985. Logical form constraints and configurational structures in Japanese, Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Washington, Seattle.

  • Hoji, Hajime. 1990. Theories on anaphora and aspects of Japanese syntax, Unpublished ms. University of Southern California.

  • Hoji, Hajime. 1998. Null object and sloppy identity in Japanese. Linguistic Inquiry 29: 127–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hornstein, Norbert. 1994. An argument for minimalism: The case of antecedent-contained deletion. Linguistic Inquiry 25: 455–480.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornstein, Norbert. 2009. A theory of syntax: Minimal operations and Universal Grammar. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasai, Hironobu. 2014. On the nature of null clausal complements in Japanese. Syntax 17: 168–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ko, Heejeong. 2005. Syntactic edges and linearization, Ph.D. Dissertation, MIT.

  • Kuroda, S.-Y. 1965. Generative grammatical studies in the Japanese language, Ph.D. Dissertation.

  • McCloskey, James. 1991. Clause structure, ellipsis and proper government in Irish. Lingua 85: 259–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCloskey, James. 2011. The shape of Irish clauses. In Formal approaches to celtic linguistics, ed. Andrew Carnie, 143–178. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merchant, Jason. 2001. The syntax of silence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Ohso, Mieko. 1976. A study of zero pronominalization in Japanese, Ph.D. Dissertation. Ohio State University, Columbus.

  • Oku, Satoshi. 1998. A theory of selection and reconstruction in the minimalist program, Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Connecticut, Storrs.

  • Otani, Kazuyo, and John Whitman. 1991. V-raising and VP-ellipsis. Linguistic Inquiry 22: 345–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rooth, Mats. 1992. Ellipsis redundancy and reduction redundancy. In Proceedings of the Stuttgart ellipsis workshop, ed. Steve Berman and Arild Hestvik, 1–26. Stuttgart: University of Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sag, Ivan. 1976. Deletion and logical form, Ph.D. Dissertation. MIT.

  • Saito, Mamoru. 1985. Some asymmetries in Japanese and their theoretical implications, Ph.D. Dissertation. MIT.

  • Saito, Mamoru. 2004. Ellipsis and pronominal reference in Japanese clefts. Nanzan Linguistics 1: 21–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saito, Mamoru. 2007. Notes on East Asian argument ellipsis. Language Research 43: 203–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saito, Mamoru, and Keiko Murasugi. 1990. N’-deletion in Japanese: A preliminary study. In Japanese/Korean Linguistics, Vol. 1, 258–301. Stanford: CSLI Publications.

  • Saito, Mamoru, T.-H. Jonah Lin, and Keiko Murasugi. 2008. N′-ellipsis and the structure of noun phrases in Chinese and Japanese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 18: 247–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sakamoto, Yuta. 2016. Phases and argument ellipsis in Japanese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 25: 243–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sakamoto, Yuta. 2017. Escape from silent syntax, Ph.D. dissertation. Storrs: University of Connecticut.

  • Shinohara, Michie. 2006. On some differences between the major deletion phenomena and Japanese argument ellipsis. Unpublished ms, Nanzan University.

  • Takahashi, Daiko. 2008a. Noun phrase ellipsis. In The Oxford Handbook of Japanese Linguistics, ed. Shigeru Miyagawa and Mamoru Saito, 394–422. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takahashi, Daiko. 2008b. Quantificational null objects and argument ellipsis. Linguistic Inquiry 39: 307–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takahashi, Daiko. 2012. Looking at argument ellipsis derivationally. Paper presented at the 15th Workshop of the International Research Project on Comparative Syntax and Language Acquisition, Nanzan University.

  • Takahashi, Daiko. 2013. A note on parallelism for elliptic arguments. In Proceedings of FAJL 6: Formal approaches to Japanese linguistics, ed. Kazuko Yatsushiro and Uli Sauerland, 203–213. Cambridge: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.

  • Takahashi, Daiko. 2014. Argument ellipsis, anti-agreement, and scrambling. In Japanese Syntax in Comparative Perspective, ed. by Mamoru Saito, 88-116, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Takita, Kensuke. 2010. Cyclic linearization and constraints on movement and ellipsis, Ph.D. Dissertation. Nanzan University.

  • Takita, Kensuke. 2011. Argument ellipsis in Japanese right dislocation. In Japanese/Korean Linguistics, Vol. 18, 380–391. Stanford: CSLI Publications.

  • Takita, Kensuke. 2014. Pseudo-right dislocation, the bare-topic construction, and hanging topic constructions. Lingua 140: 137–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takita, Kensuke. To appear. Parallelism and antecedent-containment in clausal argument ellipsis. In Proceedings of workshop on Altaic Formal Linguistics 11, Cambridge: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.

  • Tanaka, Hidekazu. 2001. Right-dislocation as scrambling. Journal of Linguistics 37: 551–579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka, Hidekazu. 2008. Clausal complement ellipsis. Unpublished ms., University of York.

  • Tancredi, Christopher. 1992. Deletion, deaccenting and presupposition, Ph.D. Dissertation. MIT.

  • Williams, Edwin. 1977. Discourse and logical form. Linguistic Inquiry 8: 101–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamashita, Hideaki. 2011. An(other) argument for the repetition analysis of Japanese right dislocation: Evidence from the distribution of thematic topic -wa. In Japanese/Korean Linguistics, Vol. 18, 410–422. Stanford: CSLI Publications.

  • Yoshida, Masaya. 2006. Sometimes smaller is better: Sluicing, gapping and semantic identity. In Proceedings of NELS 36, ed. by Christopher Davis, Amy Rose Deal, and Youri Zabbal, 681–694. Amherst: GLSA Publications.

  • Yoshida, Masaya. 2010. “Antecedent-contained” sluicing. Linguistic Inquiry 41:348–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kensuke Takita.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Takita, K. Antecedent-contained clausal argument ellipsis. J East Asian Linguist 27, 1–32 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-017-9165-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-017-9165-x

Keywords

Navigation