Skip to main content
Log in

Negative wh-construction and its semantic properties

  • Published:
Journal of East Asian Linguistics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Widely attested cross-linguistically, the Negative WH (NWH)-construction involves the special use of wh-words (e.g., ‘where’, ‘what’, and ‘how’) to convey negation in certain specific contexts. The first half of this paper identifies the negative assertion as the primary meaning of the NWH construction, in addition to two conventional implicatures. In the second half, I argue that the grammatical features in NWHCs in Chinese, Korean, and Japanese strongly suggest that NWHCs should be analyzed as interrogative wh-questions. The quantification domain of NWH-words is the sets of propositions that pick out the conversational backgrounds of the sentence (Kratzer 1977; Portner 2009). The NWHC can be paraphrased as “What is the proposition q such that in view of q, p is true?” However, the interrogative question can only receive a negative rhetorical interpretation (i.e., a question without a true answer) because the conventional implicatures make it impossible for p to be true against any of the conversational backgrounds.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

Agr:

Agreement

Dem:

Demonstrative

Nom:

Nominative

Q:

Question particle

Sg:

Singular

Cl:

Classifier

Det:

Determiner

Pl:

Plural

Rel:

Relativization marker

SP:

Sentence particle

Decl:

Declarative marker

Gen:

Genitive

Pst:

Past tense

RhetQ:

Rhetorical question particle

References

  • Caponigro, Ivano, and Jon Sprouse. 2007. Rhetorical questions as questions. In Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 11, ed. E. Puig-Waldmüller, 121–133. Barcelona: Universitat Pompeu Fabra.

  • Cheng, Lisa. 1991. On the typology of wh-questions. PhD dissertation, MIT.

  • Cheung, Lawrence Y.-L. 2008. The negative wh-construction. PhD dissertation, UCLA

  • Choi, Jinyoung. 2005. Another type of free choice effect: Korean Amwu N-Lato. In Proceedings of the 24th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, ed. John Alderete et al., 88–96. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla (Proceedings Project. www.lingref.com, document #1210).

  • Fiengo Robert. (2007) Asking questions: Using meaningful structures to imply ignorance. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Grice, Paul. 1975. Logic and conversation. In Syntax and semantics, Vol. 3, ed. P. Cole and J. Morgan, 41–58. New York: Academic Press.

  • Hamblin Charles. (1973) Questions in Montague English. Foundations of Language 10: 41–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Han Chung-Hye. (2002) Interpreting interrogatives as rhetorical questions. Lingua 112: 201–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heim, Irene. 2000. Notes on interrogative semantics. MIT “Advanced Semantics” Spring 2000. http://www2.sfs.uni-tuebingen.de/~arnim10/Lehre/SS06/Wien/Heim/interrogatives.pdf

  • Heim Irene, Angelika Kratzer. (1998) Semantics in generative grammar. Malden MA, Blackwell

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh, Miao-Ling. 2001. Form and meaning: Negation and question in Chinese. PhD dissertation, University of Southern California.

  • Karttunen Lauri. (1977) Syntax and semantics of questions. Linguistics and Philosophy 1: 3–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kratzer Angelika. (1977) What must and can must and can mean. Linguistics and Philosophy 1(3): 337–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee-Goldman, Russell. 2006. Rhetorical questions and scales: Just what do you think constructions are for? Paper presented at the international conference on construction grammar 4, Tokyo University.

  • Oxford English Dictionary. 1989. “World,” n.16. OED Online. Oxford University Press. http://dictionary.oed.com/cgi/entry/5028720. Accessed 13 Sep 2009.

  • Portner Paul. (2009) Modality. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Potts Christopher. (2005) The logic of conventional implicatures. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadock, Jerrold M. 1971. Queclaratives. In Papers from the Seventh Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 223–232. Chicago: Chicago Linguistics Society.

  • Sadock Jerrold M. (1974) Towards a linguistic theory of speech acts. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • von Fintel, Kai. 1994. Restrictions on quantifier domains. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.

  • von Fintel, Kai, and Irene Heim. 2009. Lecture notes on intensional semantics. MIT Spring 2009. http://mit.edu/fintel/IntensionalSemantics.pdf

  • Wang, Li. 1958/1988. Hanyu Shigao [A sketch of the history of the Chinese language]. Vol. 9 of In Collection of Essays of Wang Li. Jinan: Shandong Education Publisher.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lawrence Yam-Leung Cheung.

Additional information

The author is now working at the Department of Decision Sciences, Chinese University of Hong Kong.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cheung, L.YL. Negative wh-construction and its semantic properties. J East Asian Linguist 18, 297–321 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-009-9051-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-009-9051-2

Keywords

Navigation