Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Preposition doubling in Flemish and its implications for the syntax of Dutch PPs

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper explores the previously undiscussed phenomenon of preposition doubling in Flemish Dutch dialects. It offers an account for the properties of this phenomenon adapting the basic internal structures for Dutch PPs proposed by Koopman (2010) and Den Dikken (2010a). They argue following Van Riemsdijk (1978, 1990) that PPs contain functional structure, parallel to the verbal and nominal domain: the lexical P is dominated by a PlaceP–parallel to vP–and also a DegP, hosting degree modifiers, and a CP[Place]. We argue that doubling PPs are the result of identical spell-out of a locative P-element (PLoc) and a directional P-element (PDir), in a structure in which PLoc has a full extended projection but PDir does not. The CP[Place] in the functional layer of PLoc in doubling PPs is defective, which derives doubling as well as the distribution of R-words in these PPs. C[Place]’s defectivity also provides a window on the cross-dialectal distribution of P-doubling: the availability of P-doubling in certain dialects is correlated with the use of the directional preposition van ‘of, from’ as the introducer of infinitival clauses exhibiting NP-raising.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arregi, Karlos. 2003. Clausal pied piping. Natural Language Semantics 11: 115–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbiers, Sjef. 2000. The right periphery of SOV languages: English and Dutch. In The derivation of VO and OV, ed. Peter Svenonius, 181–254. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbiers, Sjef, Olaf Koeneman, and Marika Lekakou. 2009. Syntactic doubling and the structure of wh-chains. Journal of Linguistics 45: 1–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergh, Gunnar. 1998. Double prepositions in English. In Advances in English historical linguistics, ed. Jacek Fisiak and Marcin Krygier, 1–13. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bergh, Gunnar, and Aimo Seppänen. 2000. Preposition stranding with wh-relatives: A historical survey. English Language and Linguistics 4: 295–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Booij, Geert. 2002. Separable complex verbs in Dutch: A case of periphrastic word formation. In Verb-particle explorations, ed. Nicole Dehé, Ray Jackendoff, Andrew Macintyre, and Silke Urban, 21–42. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booij, Geert. 2008. Pseudo-incorporation in Dutch. Groninger Arbeiten zur Germanistischen Linguistik 46: 2–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bošković, Željko. 2002. On multiple wh-fronting. Linguistic Inquiry 33: 351–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Ken Hale. A life in language, ed. Michael Kenstowicz, 1–52. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam. 2006. On phases. In Foundational issues in linguistic theory, ed. Freidin Robert, Otero Carlos, and Zubizaretta Maria-Luisa. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • den Dikken, Marcel. 2010a. On the functional structure of locative and directional PPs. In Mapping spatial PPs: The cartography of syntactic structures, vol. 6, ed. Cinque Guglielmo and Rizzi Luigi. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • den Dikken, Marcel. 2010b. Arguments for successive-cyclic movement through SpecCP: A critical review. Linguistic Variation Yearbook 9: 89–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • den Dikken, Marcel. 2003. When particles won’t part. Paper presented at CGSW18, University of Durham. http://web.gc.cuny.edu/dept/lingu/dendikken/docs/particles.pdf.

  • Fowlie, Meaghan. 2010. More multiple multiple spell-out. In Proceedings of GLOW 31 Principles of Linearisation workshop. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

  • Gehrke, Berit. 2007. On directional readings of locative prepositions. In Proceedings of Console XIV, ed. Sylvia Blaho, Luis Vicente, and Erik Schoorlemmer, 99–120.

  • Grimshaw, Jane. 1991/2005. Extended projection. In Words and structure, ed. Jane Grimshaw, 1–73. Stanford: CSLI.

  • Haddican Bill, Hidekazu Tanaka, and George Tsoulas. 2006. Clausal pied-piping in English. Talk presented at NESS, Edinburgh, November 17, 2006.

  • Haider, Hubert. 2000. OV is more basic than VO. In The derivation of VO and OV, ed. Peter Svenonius, 45–67. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helmantel, Marjon. 2002. Interactions in the Dutch adpositional domain. LOT Dissertation Series.

  • Hermon, Gabriella. 1984. Syntactic modularity. Dordrecht: Foris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoekstra, Teun, Monic Lansu, and Marion Westerduin. 1987. Complexe verba. Glot 10: 61–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmberg, Anders. 2010. Null subject parameters. In Parametric variation: Null subjects in minimalist theory, ed. Theresa Biberauer, Anders Holmberg, Ian Roberts, and Michelle Sheehan, 88–124. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huijbregts, Riny, and Henk van Riemsdijk. 2007. Location and locality. In Clausal and phrasal architecture: syntactic derivation and interpretation: A Festschrift for Joseph E. Emonds, ed. Simin Karimi, Vida Samiian, and Wendy Wilkins, 339–364. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jónsson, Jóhannes G. 2008. Preposition reduplication in Icelandic. In Microvariations in syntactic doubling (Syntax and Semantics 36), ed. Sjef Barbiers, Margreet Van der Ham, Olaf Koeneman, and Marika Lekakou, 403–417. Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

  • Kayne, Richard. 1994. The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koopman, Hilda. 1995. De plaats van geinkorporeerde hoofden in de werkwoordskluster. Tabu 25: 174–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koopman, Hilda. 2010. Prepositions, postpositions, circumpositions, and particles. In Mapping spatial PPs: The cartography of syntactic structures, vol. 6, ed. Cinque Guglielmo and Rizzi Luigi. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koopman, Hilda. 2000. Prepositions, postpositions, circumpositions, and particles. In The syntax of specifiers and heads, 204–260. London: Routledge.

  • Li, Yafei. 1990. X°-binding and verb incorporation. Linguistic Inquiry 21: 399–426.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunes, Jairo. 2004. Linearization of chains and sideward movement. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortiz de Urbina, Jon. 1989. Parameters in the grammar of Basque: A GB approach to Basque syntax. Dordrecht: Foris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortiz de Urbina, Jon. 1993. Feature percolation and clausal pied-piping. In Generative studies in Basque linguistics, ed. José Ignacio Hualde and Jon Ortiz de Urbina, 189–219. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radford, Andrew. 2004. English syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radford, Andrew, and Claudia Felser. 2011. On preposition copying and preposition pruning in wh-clauses in English. Essex Research Reports in Linguistics 60.

  • Roberts, Ian. 2010. A deletion analysis of null subjects. In Parametric variation: Null subjects in minimalist theory, ed. Theresa Biberauer, Anders Holmberg, Ian Roberts, and Michele Sheehan, 58–87. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudkowski, Paweł. 2007. The syntactic properties and diachronic development of postnominal adjectives in Polish. In Formal approaches to Slavic linguistics 15: The Toronto meeting 2006, ed. Richard Compton, Magdalena Goledzinowska, and Ulyana Savchenko, 326–345. Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shim, Ji Young. 2012. Deriving word order in code-switching: Feature inheritance and light verbs. Doctoral dissertation, CUNY Graduate Center.

  • Simpson, Andrew, and Tanmoy Bhattacharya. 2003. Obligatory overt wh-movement in a wh-in-situ language. Linguistic Inquiry 34(1): 127–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Troseth, Erika. 2004. Negative inversion and degree inversion in the English DP. Linguistics in the Big Apple. http://web.gc.cuny.edu/Linguistics/liba/papers/troseth_LIBA.pdf

  • van Craenenbroeck, Jeroen. 2000. Complementerend van: een voorbeeld van syntactische variatie in het Nederlands. Nederlandse Taalkunde 5: 133–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Riemsdijk, Henk. 1978. A case study in syntactic markedness: The binding nature of prepositional phrases. Dordrecht: Foris.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Riemsdijk, Henk. 1990. Functional prepositions. In Unity in diversity. Festschrift for Simon Dik, ed. Harm Pinkster and Inge Genée, 229–242. Dordrecht: Foris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yadroff, Michael, and Steven Franks. 2001. The origin of prepositions. In Current issues in formal Slavic linguistics, ed. Gerhild Zybatow, Uwe Junghanns, Grit Mehlhorn, and Luka Szucsich, 69–79. Frankfurt/Main: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. GIST, Ghent University, Muinkkaai 42, 9000, Ghent, Belgium

    Lobke Aelbrecht

  2. CUNY Graduate Center, 365 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY, 10016-4309, USA

    Marcel den Dikken

Authors
  1. Lobke Aelbrecht
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Marcel den Dikken
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lobke Aelbrecht.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Aelbrecht, L., den Dikken, M. Preposition doubling in Flemish and its implications for the syntax of Dutch PPs. J Comp German Linguistics 16, 33–68 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10828-013-9054-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10828-013-9054-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation