Abstract
Impersonal pronouns are pervasive in the world’s languages; boundaries between personal and impersonal paradigms are porous. Thus, in many languages, 2nd-person pronouns can be impersonal (i), and vary under the influence of quantificational adverbs like always and rarely.
-
(i)
In those days, you always/usually/rarely lived to be 60.
Additionally, dedicated impersonal pronouns may have a special association with the speaker, as argued for English one (Safir 2004; Moltmann 2006, 2010) and German man (Kratzer 1997) (ii).
- (ii)
This paper presents a comparative investigation of the interpretation of impersonal pronouns in English and German, each of which shows signs of both indexicality and impersonal, variable interpretation. The analysis places these pronouns within the pronominal paradigms of English and German, presenting a novel combination of independently-motivated type-shifting mechanisms (Pustejovsky 1995) and an expansion of the general theory of pronominal features (Kratzer 2009). I argue that distinct elements in the semantics of the items are responsible for the varying impersonal and the indexical behaviours. This is a step towards understanding the processes that take pronouns from the personal to the impersonal category, or back.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alonso-Ovalle, L. 2002. Arbitrary pronouns are not that indefinite. In Proceedings of Going Romance 2000, ed. C. Beyssade, R. Bok-Bennema, F. Drijkoningen, and P. Monachesi, 1–14. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Anand, P. 2005. Response to Malamud (2005). (Presented at LSA workshop context and content—topics in formal pragmatics. Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.)
Anand, P., and A. Nevins. 2004. Shifty operators in changing contexts: indexicals in zazaki and slave. In Proceedings of SALT 14, ed. R.B. Young, 20–37. Ithaca: CLC Publications.
Asher, N. 2006. Things and their aspects. Philosophical Issues 16: 1–20.
Asher, N., and J. Pustejovsky. 2006. A type composition logic for generative lexicon. Journal of Cognitive Science 6: 1–38.
Barker, C., and C-c Shan. 2008. Donkey anaphora is in-scope binding. Semantics and Pragmatics 1: 1–46.
Beaver, D., I. Francez, and D. Levinson. 2005. Bad subject: (Non-)canonicality and NP distribution in existentials. In Proceedings of SALT 15, ed. E. Georgala and J. Howell. Ithaca: CLC Publications.
Benveniste, É. 1966. Problèmes de linguistique générale, 1. Paris: Gallimard.
Berman, S. 1987. Situation-based semantics for adverbs of quantification. In University of Massachusetts occasional papers in linguistics 12, ed. J. Blevins and A. Vainikka. GLSA: Amherst.
Cabredo-Hofherr, P. 2002. Arbitrary readings of 3pl pronominals. In Proceedings of Sinn und bedeutung VII, ed. M. Weisgerber. Germany: University of Konstanz.
Cabredo-Hofherr, P. 2004. Impersonal pronouns in Somali, French and German. (Paper presented at Syntax of the World’s Languages (SWL 1), Leipzig, Germany. Retrieved from http://email.eva.mpg.de/~cschmidt/SWL1/handouts/Cabredo.pdf)
Cabredo-Hofherr, P. 2010. Binding properties of impersonal human pronouns in generic and episodic contexts. (Paper presented at Workshop on impersonal human pronouns, UMR 7023 Structures formelles du langage CNRS/Université Paris-8, Paris, France. Retrieved from http://www.umr7023.cnrs.fr/Programme,882.html)
Chierchia, G. 1989. Anaphora and attitudes de se. In Language in context, ed. R. Bartsch, J. van Benthem, and P. van Emde Boas. Dordrecht: Foris.
Chierchia, G. 1995a. The variability of impersonal subjects. In Quantification in natural languages, ed. E. Bach, E. Jelinek, A. Kratzer, and B.H. Partee, 107–143. Boston: Kluwer.
Chierchia, G. 1995b. Dynamics of meaning: anaphora, presupposition, and the theory of grammar. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Chierchia, G. 1998. Reference to kinds across languages. Natural Language Semantics 6(4): 339–405.
Chierchia, G. 2000. Chinese conditionals and the theory of conditionals. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 9: 1–54.
Chomsky, N. 1981. Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.
Collins, C., and Postal, P. (2008). Imposters. Ms. New York University. Retrieved March 20, 2010 from lingBuzz website: http://ling.auf.net/lingBuzz/000640
Collins, C., and P. Postal. 2012. Imposters: a study of pronominal agreement. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Cooper, R. 2007. Copredication, dynamic generalized quantification and lexical innovation by coercion. (In Proceedings of GL2007, Fourth International Workshop on Generative Approaches to the Lexicon, retrieved from http://www.ling.gu.se/~cooper/records/copredinnov.pdf)
D’Alessandro, R., and Alexiadou, A. 2003. Inclusive and exclusive impersonal pronouns: a feature-geometrical analysis. Paper presented at IGG XXIX, Urbino, Italy. Retrieved from http://webhost.ua.ac.be/apil/apil107/file09.PDF
de Swart, H. 1991. Adverbs of quantification: A generalized quantifier approach. Dissertation: Groningen University.
de Swart, H. 1995. Quantifcation over time. In Quantifiers, logic, and language, ed. J. van der Does and J. van Eijck. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Dekker, P. 1990. ‘Existential disclosure’. ITLI prepublication, University of Amsterdam
Diesing, M. 1992. Indefinites. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Egerland, V. 2003. Impersonal pronouns in Scandinavian and romance. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 71: 75–102.
Elbourne, P. 2002. Situations and individuals. Dissertation, MIT, reprinted as Elbourne, P. 2005. Situations and individuals. (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press)
Embick, D., and R. Noyer. 2006. Distributed morphology and the syntax/morphology interface. In The Oxford handbook of linguistic interfaces, ed. G. Ramchand and C. Reiss. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Farkas, D. 1990. Two cases of underspecification in morphology. Linguistic Inquiry 21: 539–550.
Felser, C., and L. Rupp. 2001. Expletives as arguments: Germanic existential sentences revisited. Linguistische Berichte 187: 289–324.
Fine, K. 1982. Acts, events, and things. In Sprache und Ontologie: Proceedings of the Eighth Wittgenstein Symposium, eds. W. Leinfellner et al., 97–105. Vienna: Hoelder-Pichler-Tempsky.
Geach, P.T. 1962. Reference and generality. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Gordon, R.M. 1986. Folkpsychology as simulation. Mind and Language 1: 158–171.
Grewendorf, G. 1989. Ergativity in German. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Groenendijk, J., and Stokhof, M. 1990. Dynamic montague grammar, In Papers from the second symposium on logic and language, ed. Kalman L and Plos L. Akadémiai Kaidó.
Grosz, B., A. Joshi, and S. Weinstein. 1995. Centering: a framework for modelling local coherence of discourse. Computational Linguistics 21: 203–225.
Halle, M. 1997. Distributed morphology: impoverishment and fission. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 30: 425–449.
Harley, H., and E. Ritter. 2002. A feature-geometric analysis of person and number. Language 78: 482–526.
Heim, I. 1982. The semantics of definite and indefinite noun phrases. Dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst. (Published 1988) in Outstanding dissertations in linguistics, New York: Garland.
Heim, I. 1990. E-type pronouns and donkey anaphora. Linguistics and Philosophy 13(2): 137–177.
Honcoop, M. 1998. Dynamic excursions on weak islands. Leiden: Dissertation.
Jaeggli, O. 1986. Arbitrary plural pronominals. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 4: 43–76.
Joshi, A., and Kuhn, S. 1979. Centered logic: The role of entity centered sentence representation in natural language inferencing. In Proceedings of the 6th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 435–439).
Kallulli, D. 2007. Rethinking the passive/anticausative distinction. Linguistic Inquiry 38(4): 770–780.
Kamp, H. 1981. A theory of truth and semantic representation. In J. Groenendijk, T. Janssen & M. Stokhof (Eds.), Formal methods in the study of language (pp. 277–322). Amsterdam: Mathematic Center Tract 135. (Reprinted in J. Groenendijk, T. Janssen & M. Stokhof (Eds.), Truth, interpretation, and information (pp.1-41). Dordrecht: Foris.)
Kaplan, D. 1989. Demonstratives. In Themes from Kaplan, ed. J. Almog, J. Perry, and H. Wettstein, 481–563. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Keller, P. 2004. Qua qua qua. (Paper presented at the Geneva graduate school on abstract entities, 6th of June, Geneva, Switzerland.)
Kitagawa, C., and A. Lehrer. 1990. Impersonal uses of personal pronouns. Journal of Pragmatics 14: 739–759.
Koenig, J.-P. 1999. On a tué le président! the nature of passives and ultra-indefinites. In Cognition and function in language, ed. B. Fox, D. Jurafsky, and L. Michaelis, 256–272. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Koenig, J.-P., and G. Mauner. 1999. A-definites and the semantics of implicit arguments. Journal of Semantics 16: 207–236.
Kratzer, A. 1997. German impersonal pronouns and logophoricity. (Paper presented at Sinn und Bedeutung II. Berlin, Germany. Retrieved June 28, 2010 from the Semantics Archive http://semanticsarchive.net/Archive/WViZTE1M/Impersonal%20Pronouns%20&%20Logophoricity.pdf)
Kratzer, A. 2009. Making a pronoun: fake indexicals as windows into the properties of pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 40: 187–237.
Laberge, S. 1977. Étude de la variation des pronoms sujets définis et indéfinis dans le français parlé à Montréal. Dissertation: Université de Montréal.
Laberge, S., and G. Sankoff. 1979. Anything you can do. In Syntax and semantics, volume 12: discourse and syntax, ed. T. Givon, 419–440. New York: Academic.
Lebeaux, D. 1984. Anaphoric binding and the definition of PRO. In C. Jones and P. Sells (Eds.), Proceedings of NELS 14 (pp. 252–274). University of Massachusetts, Amherst: GLSA
Leslau, W. 1995. A reference grammar of Amharic. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag.
Lewis, D.K. 1971. Counterparts of persons and their bodies. The Journal of Philosophy 68: 203–211.
Lewis, D.K. 1975. Adverbs of quantification. In Formal semantics of natural language, ed. E.L. Keenan, 3–15. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lewis, D.K. 1979. Attitudes de dicto and de se. Philosophical Review 88: 513–543.
Lewis, D.K. 2003. Things qua truthmakers. In Real metaphysics—essays in honour of D.H.Mellor, ed. H. Lillehammer and G. Rodríguez-Pereyra, 25–38. London: Routledge.
Lockwood, W.B. 1968. Historical German syntax. Oxford: Clarendon.
Malamud, S. 2005. Arbitrary monsters: you and one. Paper presented at LSA workshop context and content—topics in formal pragmatics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
Malamud, S. 2006. Semantics and pragmatics of arbitrariness. Dissertation: University of Pennsylvania.
Malamud, S. in prep. (In)definiteness-driven typology of arbitrary items. Unpublished manuscript. Retrieved April 29, 2005 from Brandeis University website: http://people.brandeis.edu/~smalamud/malamud-vol.pdf
Moltmann, F. 1997. Parts and wholes in semantics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Moltmann, F. 2006. Generic one, arbitrary PRO, and the first person. Natural Language Semantics 14: 257–281.
Moltmann, F. 2010. Generalizing detached self-reference and the semantics of generic one. Mind and Language 25(4): 440–473.
Myhill, J. 1997. Toward a functional typology of agent defocusing. Linguistics 35: 799–844.
Nakanishi, K., and M. Romero. 2003. Two constructions with most and their semantic properties. In Proceedings of NELS 34 at SUNY Stony Brook, ed. K. Moulton and M. Wolf, 453–468. University of Massachusetts at Amherst: GLSA.
Neale, S. 1990. Descriptions. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Partee, B.H. 1986. Noun phrase interpretation and type-shifting principles. In Studies in discourse representation theory and the theory of generalized quantifiers, ed. J. Groenendijk, D. de Jongh, and M. Stokhof. Dordrecht: Foris.
Pesetsky, D., and E. Torrego. 2001. T-to-C: causes and consequences. In Ken Hale: a life in language, ed. M. Kenstowicz, 355–426. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Potts, C. 2005. The logic of conventional implicatures. Oxford studies in theoretical linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Prince, E.F. 2003. The Yiddish impersonal pronoun me(n) ‘one’: a Centering analysis. (Presented at the Annual Meeting of the LSA. Atlanta.)
Prince, E.F. 2006. Impersonal pronouns in French and Yiddish: semantic reference vs. discourse reference. In Drawing the boundaries of meaning: Neo-gricean studies in pragmatics and semantics in honor of Laurence R. Horn, ed. B. Birner and G. Ward, 295–315. Philadelphia/Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Pustejovsky, J. 1995. The generative lexicon. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Pustejovsky, J. 2007. Type theory and lexical decomposition. (In P. Bouillon and C. Lee (Eds.), Trends in Generative Lexicon Theory. Kluwer Publishers (in press).)
Safir, K. 2004. What does one mean when one says it? (Presented at Harvard-MIT-UConn Indexicality Workshop. 11/19/2004, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.)
Schlenker, P. 2003. A plea for monsters. Linguistics and Philosophy 26: 29–120.
Schütze, C.T. 1997. INFL in child and adult language: Agreement, case, and licensing. Dissertation, MIT.
Siewierska, A. 2008. Impersonalization from a subject-centred vs. Agent-centred perspective. Transactions of the Philological Society 106: 1–23.
Sigurðsson, H.Á. 1991. Icelandic case-marked PRO and the licensing of lexical arguments. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 9: 327–363.
Suñer, M. 1983. Pro arb. Linguistic Inquiry 14: 188–191.
von Fintel, K. 1995. A minimal theory of adverbial quantification. In Context dependence in the analysis of linguistic meaning, ed. B. Partee and H. Kamp, 153–193. Stuttgart/Prague: IMS Stuttgart Working Papers.
Walker, M., Joshi, A., and Prince, E.F. (Eds). 1998. Centering theory in discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Yip, M., J. Maling, and R. Jackendoff. 1987. Case in tiers. Language 63: 217–250.
Zeijlstra, H., and Aalberse, S. 2008. The semantic (un)markedness of pronominal features. (Paper presented at Workshop on Markedness and Underspecification in the Morphology and Semantics of Agreement (MUMSA). Harvard University, Cambridge, MA. March 1, 2008.)
Zifonun, G. 2000. Man lebt nur einmal. Morphosyntax und Semantik des Pronomens man. Deutsche Sprache 28: 232–253.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Malamud, S.A. Impersonal indexicals: one, you, man, and du . J Comp German Linguistics 15, 1–48 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10828-012-9047-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10828-012-9047-6