The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics

, Volume 10, Issue 3, pp 235–248 | Cite as

Bettelou Los, The Rise of The To-Infinitive, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005, pp. xv + 335, ISBN 0199274762

  • Tomoyuki Tanaka
Book Review


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bock, H. (1931). Studien zum präpositionalen infinitiv und akkusativ mit dem to-infinitiv. Anglia, 55, 115–249.Google Scholar
  2. Bresnan, J. (1979). Theory of complementation in English syntax. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
  3. Callaway, M. (1913). The infinitive in Anglo-Saxon. Washington DC: Carnegie Institution of Washington.Google Scholar
  4. Fischer, O., van Kemenade, A., Koopman, W., & van der Wurff, W. (2000). The syntax of early English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Guasti, M. (1990). The ‘faire-par’ construction in Romance and in Germanic. In: A. Halpern (Ed.), Proceedings of the Ninth West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (pp. 205–218). Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
  6. Ishikawa, K. (1999). English verb-particle constructions and a V0-internal structure. English Linguistics, 16, 329–352.Google Scholar
  7. Jarad, N. (1997). The origin and development of for-infinitives. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Wales, Bangor.Google Scholar
  8. Jespersen, O. (1940). A modern English grammar on historical principles, part V. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
  9. Kageyama, T. (1992). AGR in Old English to-infinitives. Lingua, 88, 91–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kayne, R. (1994). The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  11. Kroch, A., & Taylor, A. (1994). The Penn–Helsinki parsed corpus of Middle English. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
  12. Kroch, A., & Taylor, A. (2000). The Penn–Helsinki parsed corpus of Middle English, 2nd edition. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
  13. Lasnik, H., & Saito, M. (1991). On the subject of infinitives. In L. Dobrin, L. Nichols, & R. Rodriguez (Eds.), Papers from the 27th regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society (pp. 324–343). Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
  14. Lightfoot, D. (1979). Principles of diachronic syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Los, B. (1999). Infinitival complementation in Old and Middle English. The Hague: Thesus.Google Scholar
  16. Mustanoja, T. (1960). A Middle English syntax, part I. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.Google Scholar
  17. Pintzuk, S., Haeberli, E., Kemenade, A., van Koopman, W., & Beths, F. (2000). The Brooklyn–Geneva–Amsterdam–Helsinki parsed corpus of Old English. York: University of York.Google Scholar
  18. Roberts, I. (1993). Verbs and diachronic syntax: A comparative history of English and French. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  19. Sobin, N. (1997). Agreement, default rules, and grammatical viruses. Linguistic Inquiry, 28, 318–343.Google Scholar
  20. Tanaka, T. (1994). On the realization of external arguments in infinitives. English Linguistics, 11, 76–99.Google Scholar
  21. Tanaka, T. (2005). Restructuring in the history of English: A preliminary investigation. Linguistics and Philology, 24, 1–16.Google Scholar
  22. Tanaka, T. (2007). The rise of lexical subjects in English infinitives. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics, 10, 25–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Taylor, A., Warner, A., Pintzuk, S., & Beths, F. (2003). The York–Toronto–Helsinki parsed corpus of Old English prose. York: University of York.Google Scholar
  24. van Gelderen, E. (1993). The rise of functional categories. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
  25. van Kemenade, A. (1987). Syntactic case and morphological case in the history of English. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
  26. Visser, F. (1966). An historical syntax of the English language, part II. Leiden: E.J. Brill.Google Scholar
  27. Warner, A. (1982) Complementation in Middle English and the methodology of historical syntax. New York: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
  28. Wurmbrand, S. (2001). Infinitives: Restructuring and clause structure. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of English Linguistics, Faculty of LettersNagoya UniversityNagoyaJapan

Personalised recommendations