Abstract
Partly due to disagreement on acceptability judgements, there is little agreement on the possibility of PP-internal and DP-internal focus particles in languages such as Dutch, English, and German. Our large-scale corpus investigation reveals that PP-internal focus particles are a genuine possibility, not only in English, but also in Dutch and, to a lesser extent, German. These results seem to be incompatible with a number of existing syntactic theories of bound focus in German. However, our investigation also provides evidence for a strong dispreference for focus particles to follow a preposition, although the dispreference is less strong in Dutch than in German. Qualitative analysis of the corpus data shows that the variational patterns found in English, Dutch, and German are highly similar, and are influenced by lexical-semantic as well as syntactic factors. We sketch an alternative analysis, couched in the framework of stochastic Optimality Theory.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barbiers, S. (2003a). Focus Particle Doubling and V2. Paper presented at the TIN-dag, Utrecht, Netherlands, February 1, 2003.
Barbiers, S. (2003b). Generalized Focus Particle Doubling. Paper presented at CGSW, Durham, UK, September 2003.
Bayer J. (1990). Interpretive Islands: Evidence for connectedness and global harmony in Logical Form. In: Grewendorf G, Sternefeld W. (eds) Scrambling and barriers. Amsterdam, Benjamins
Bayer J. (1996). Directionality and logical form: On the scope of focusing particles and WH-in-situ. Dordrecht, Kluwer
Behaghel, O. (1932). Deutsche syntax, Vol. 4. Heidelberg: Winter Verlag. Boersma, P. (1998). Functional phonology: Formalizing the interactions between articulatory and perceptual drives. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Amsterdam.
Boersma P., Hayes B. (2001). Empirical tests of the Gradual Learning Algorithm. Linguistic Inquiry 32: 45–86
Bresnan, J., Dingare, S., & Manning C. D. (2001). Soft constraints mirror hard constraints: Voice and person in English and Lummi. In: M. Butt & T.H. King (Eds.), Proceedings of the LFG01 Conference, CSLI Publications.
Bü ring D., Hartmann K. (2001). The syntax and semantics of focus sensitive particles in German. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 19: 229–281
Chomsky N. (1976). Conditions on rules of grammar. Linguistic Analysis 2: 303–352
Clark B. Z. (2004). A stochastic optimality theory approach to syntactic change. Dissertation, Stanford University.
Grimshaw J. (1997). Projection, heads, and optimality. Linguistic Inquiry 28: 373–422
Hendriks P. (2004). Either, both and neither in coordinate structures. In: ter Meulen A., Abraham W.(eds). The composition of meaning: From lexeme to discourse. Amsterdam, John Benjamins, pp. 115-138
Hoeksema J. (1989). Only in Dutch: a comparison of three adverbs. Penn Review of Linguistics 13: 106–121
Hoeksema J. (1999). Review of Josef Bayer, Directionality and Logical Form. Journal of Linguistics 35: 395–399
Hoeksema J., Zwarts F. (1991). Some remarks on focus adverbs. Journal of Semantics 8: 51–70
Jacobs J. (1983). Fokus und Skalen: Zur Syntax und Semantik der Gradpartikeln im Deutschen. Tübingen, Niemeyer
Jäger G. (2004). Learning constraint sub-hierarchies. The Bidirectional Gradual Learning Algorithm. In: Blutner R., Zeevat H. (eds). Optimality theory and pragmatics. MacMillan, Palgrave, pp. 251- 287
Kayne R.S. (2000). Parameters and universals. Oxford, Oxford University Press
Klein H. (1998). Adverbs of degree in Dutch and related languages. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia, John Benjamins
König E. (1991). The meaning of focus particles: A comparative perspective. London, Routledge
Link G. (1983). The logical analysis of plurals and mass terms: A lattice-theoretic approach. In: Bäuerle R., Schwarze C., von Stechow A.(eds). Meaning, use and interpretation of language. Berlin, De Gruyter, pp. 302-323
Malouf, R. & van Noord G. (2004). Wide Coverage Parsing with Stochastic Attribute Value Grammars. In: IJCNLP-04 Workshop Beyond Shallow Analyses – Formalisms and statistical modeling for deep analyses.
Neijt A. (1979). Gapping: A contribution to sentence grammar. Dordrecht, Foris
Prince, A., & Smolensky, P. (2004). Optimality theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar. Oxford: Blackwell. (distributed as unpublished manuscript, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ and University of Colorado, Boulder, 1993).
Reinhart T. (1976). The syntactic domain of anaphora. Dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA
Reis M., Rosengren I. (1997). A modular approach to the grammar of additive particles: the case of German Auch. Journal of Semantics 14(3): 237–309
Reis M. (2005). On the syntax of so-called focus particles in German —- A reply to Büring And Hartmann 2001. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 23(2): 459–483
Rooth, M. (1985). Association with focus. Dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
Ross J.R., Cooper W.E. (1979). Like syntax. In: Cooper W.E., Walker E.C.T. (eds). Sentence processing: Psycholinguistic studies presented to Honor Merrill Garrett. Hillsdale NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum
Shannon, T. F. (1995). Extraposition of NP complements in Dutch and German: An empirical comparison. In: T. F. Shannon, & J. P. Snapper (Eds.), The Berkeley Conference on Dutch Linguistics 1993 (pp. 87–116). Lanham, MD: University Press of America. Stowell, T. (1981). Origins of phrase structure. Ph.D. Dissertation, Cambridge, MA MIT.
Taglicht J. (1984). Message and emphasis: On focus and scope in English. London, Longman
van der Beek L., Bouma G., van Noord G. (2002). Een brede computationele grammatica voor het Nederlands. Nederlandse Taalkunde 7(4): 353–374
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0 ), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Bouma, G., Hendriks, P. & Hoeksema, J. Focus Particles Inside Prepositional Phrases: A Comparison of Dutch, English, and German. J Comp German Linguistics 10, 1–24 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10828-006-9006-1
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10828-006-9006-1