Skip to main content
Log in

Stefan Müller, Complex Predicates: Verbal Complexes, Resultative Constructions, and Particle Verbs in German. Studies in Constraint-Based Lexicalism 13, Stanford: CSLI Publications, 2002, 468 pp. ISBN 1-57586-386-3

  • BookReview
  • Published:
The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Ackerman F., Webelhuth, G. (1998). A theory of predicates. Stanford, CSLI Publications

  • Bech G. (1955). Studien über das deutsche verbum infinitum. Kopenhagen, Muksgaard

    Google Scholar 

  • den Besten, H. B., Rutten J. (1989). ‘On verb raising, extraposition and free word order in Dutch’, In D. Jaspers W. G. Klooster Y. Putseys P. Seuren (Eds), Sentential complementation and the Lexicon. Studies in honor of Wim de Geest. Dordrecht, Foris

  • Bittner M., Hale K. (1996). Ergativity: Toward a theory of a heterogeneous class. Linguistic Inquiry 27, 531–604

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky N. (1981). Lectures on government and binding. Berlin, de Gruyter

    Google Scholar 

  • Dehe N., Jackendoff R., McIntyre A., Urban S. (2002). Verb-particle explorations.Berlin, Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • den Dikken M. (1995). Particles. On the syntax of verb-particle triadic and causative constructions. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • den Dikken, M. (2003). On the syntax of locative and directional adpositional phrases, CUNY.

  • ÉKiss, K., van Riemsdijk, H. C. (Eds.): (2004). Verb clusters. A study of Hungarian, German and Dutch. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

  • Emonds J. E. (1972). Evidence that indirect object movement is a structure-preserving rule. Foundations of Language, 8, 546–561

    Google Scholar 

  • Evers, A. (1975). The transformational cycle in Dutch and German. Ph.D. dissertation, Distributed by the Indiana University Linguistics Club, University of Utrecht.

  • Fanselow, G. (1989). Coherent infinitives in German: Restructuring vs. IP-complementation. In C. Bhatt, E. Löbel, C. Schmidt (Eds.), Syntactic phrase structure phenomena in noun phrases and sentences (pp. 1–16). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

  • Fraser B. (1976). The verb-particle combination in English. New York, San Francisco, London, Academic Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelhaus H. (1977). Der modale Infinitiv.Tü bingen, Narr

    Google Scholar 

  • Haegeman L. van Riemsdijk H. (1986). Verb projection raising, scope, and the typology of rules affecting verbs. Linguistic Inquiry, 17, 417–466

    Google Scholar 

  • Haiden M. (1996). The aspect of short scrambling. Wiener Linguistische Gazette, 57–59, 121–146

  • Haiden M. (2005a). Theta theory. Berlinm New York, Mouton de Gruyter

    Google Scholar 

  • Haiden, M. (2005b). Verb-particle constructions. In M. Everaert H. Blackwell companion to syntax (Vol. 5. pp. 342–373). Oxford: Blackwell.

  • Haider H. (1984a). Mona Lisa lächelt stumm–ber das sogenannte deutsche “Rezipientenpassiv”. Linguistische Berichte, 89, 32–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Haider H. (1984b). Was zu haben ist und was zu sein hat. Bemerkungen zum Infinitiv. Papiere zur Linguistik, 30, 23–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Haider H. (1993). Deutsche Syntax–generativ: Vorstudien zur Theorie einer projektiven Grammatik. Tü bingen, Narr

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinterhölzl R. (1997). Restructuring as XP-movement, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Southern California.

  • Kayne, R. (1985). Principles of particle constructions. In J. Gueron, H.-G. Obenauer J.-Y. Pollock (Eds.), Grammatical representation (pp. 101–140). Dordrecht: Foris.

  • Keenan E., Comrie B. (1977). ‘Noun phrase accessibility and universal grammar’. Linguistic Inquiry, 8, 63–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Kefer M., Lejeune J. (1974). Satzglieder innerhalb eines Verbalkomplexes. Deutsche Sprache, 2,322–334

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiss T. (1995). Infinitive Komplementation. Tü bingen, Niemeyer

    Google Scholar 

  • Koopman H. (2000). The syntax of specifiers and heads. London, New York: Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Koopman H., Szabolcsi A. (2000). Verbal complexes Cambridge Mass. MIT Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Lötscher A. (1978). Zur Verbstellung im Zü richdeutschen und in anderen Varietäten des. Dialektologie und Linguistik, 45, 1–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Lüdeling A. (2001). Particle verbs and similar constructions in German. Stanford, CSLI Publications

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre A. (2001). German double particle verbs as preverbs Morphology and Conceptual Semantics. Tü bingen, Stauffenberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Meurers, W. D. (2003). To flip or not to flip: On the nature of irregularities in the German verbal complex. Ohio State University

  • Mü ller S. (1999). Deutsche syntax deklarativ: Head-driven phrase structure grammar fü r das Deut- sche. Tübingen, Niemeyer

    Google Scholar 

  • Neeleman, Ad. (1994).Complex predicates. Utrecht University.

  • Neeleman Ad., Weerman F. (1993). The balance between syntax and morphology: Dutch par-ticles and resultatives. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 11, 433-475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patocka, F. (1997). Satzgliedstellung in den bairischen Dialekten Österreichs. Frankfurt/Main, Berlin,Bern, New York, Paris, Wien: Peter Lang.

  • Rapp I. (1997). Partizipien und semantische Struktur: zu passivischen Konstruktionen mit dem 3. Status. Tü bingen, Stauffenberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Reape, M. (1993). A formal theory of word order: A case study in West Germanic, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Edinburgh.

  • Reis M. (1985). Mona Lisa kriegt zuviel-Vom sogenannten ’Rezipientenpassiv’ im Deutschen. Linguistische Berichte, 96, 140-155

    Google Scholar 

  • Reis M., Sternefeld W. (2004). Susanne Wurmbrand: Infinitives and Clause Structure. Linguistics, 42, 469-508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosengren, I. (1992). Zum Problem der kohärenten Verben im Deutschen, in P. Suchsland (Eds), Biologische und soziale Grundlagen der Sprachfähigkeit (pp. 265-297). Niemeyer, Tü bingen, 265-297.

  • Rutten, J. (1991). Infinitival complements and auxiliaries, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Amsterdam.

  • Sternefeld, W. (1989). Beheaded Barriers, Arbeitspapiere Fachgruppe Sprachwissenschaft 14.

  • Stiebels B. (1996). Lexikalische Argumente und Adjunkte. Berlin, Akademie Verlag

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiebels B., Wunderlich D. (1994). Morphology feeds syntax: The case of particle verbs. Lin- guistics 32: 913-968

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stowell T. (1983). Subjects across categories. The Linguistic Review, 2, 285-312

    Google Scholar 

  • Taraldsen, T., K. (1983). Parametric variation in phrase structure, University of Tromsö.

  • Vailette, N. (2001). ’Book review: Stefan Mü ller (1999), Deutsche Syntax Deklarativ: Head-driven Phrase Structure Grammar fur das Deutsche (Linguistische Arbeiten 394), The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics, 4, 69-84.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Riemsdijk, H. C. (1978). A case study in syntactic markedness: The binding nature of preposi- tional phrases. Lisse: The Peter de Ridder Press [Reprinted: by Foris Publications Dordrecht and currently by Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin].

  • Williams E. (1983). Against small clauses’. Linguistic Inquiry, 14, 287-308

    Google Scholar 

  • Wurmbrand S. (2001). Infinitives. Restructuring and clause structure. Berlin, Mouton de Gruyter

    Google Scholar 

  • Wurmbrand S. (2004). Two types of restructuring-Lexical vs. Functional, Lingua, 114, 991-1014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeller, J. (1999).Particle verbs, local domains, and a theory of lexical licensing, Ph.D. dissertation, Johann Wolfgang Goethe Universitä t.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin Haiden.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Haiden, M. Stefan Müller, Complex Predicates: Verbal Complexes, Resultative Constructions, and Particle Verbs in German. Studies in Constraint-Based Lexicalism 13, Stanford: CSLI Publications, 2002, 468 pp. ISBN 1-57586-386-3. J Comp German Linguistics 9, 143–160 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10828-006-9000-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10828-006-9000-7

Navigation