Spike timing precision of neuronal circuits
Spike timing is believed to be a key factor in sensory information encoding and computations performed by the neurons and neuronal circuits. However, the considerable noise and variability, arising from the inherently stochastic mechanisms that exist in the neurons and the synapses, degrade spike timing precision. Computational modeling can help decipher the mechanisms utilized by the neuronal circuits in order to regulate timing precision. In this paper, we utilize semi-analytical techniques, which were adapted from previously developed methods for electronic circuits, for the stochastic characterization of neuronal circuits. These techniques, which are orders of magnitude faster than traditional Monte Carlo type simulations, can be used to directly compute the spike timing jitter variance, power spectral densities, correlation functions, and other stochastic characterizations of neuronal circuit operation. We consider three distinct neuronal circuit motifs: Feedback inhibition, synaptic integration, and synaptic coupling. First, we show that both the spike timing precision and the energy efficiency of a spiking neuron are improved with feedback inhibition. We unveil the underlying mechanism through which this is achieved. Then, we demonstrate that a neuron can improve on the timing precision of its synaptic inputs, coming from multiple sources, via synaptic integration: The phase of the output spikes of the integrator neuron has the same variance as that of the sample average of the phases of its inputs. Finally, we reveal that weak synaptic coupling among neurons, in a fully connected network, enables them to behave like a single neuron with a larger membrane area, resulting in an improvement in the timing precision through cooperation.
KeywordsSpike timing precision Semi-analytical methods Non Monte Carlo analysis Feedback inhibition Synaptic coupling Synaptic integration
This work was supported by the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TÜBİTAK) under project 111E188.
The authors would like to thank two anonymous reviewers for their thoughtful and detailed feedback on an earlier version of the manuscript.
- Chiu, C S, Jensen, K, Sokolova, I, Wang, D, Li, M, Deshpande, P, Davidson, N, Mody, I, Quick, M W, Quake, S R, et al. (2002). Number, density, and surface/cytoplasmic distribution of gaba transporters at presynaptic structures of knock-in mice carrying gaba transporter subtype 1–green fluorescent protein fusions. Journal of Neuroscience, 22(23), 10,251–10,266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Cover, TM, & Thomas, JA. (2012). Elements of information theory. Wiley.Google Scholar
- Dayan, P, & Abbott, LF. (2001). Theoretical neuroscience. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- De Smedt, V, Gielen, G, Dehaene, W. (2015). Injection-locked oscillators. In Temperature-and supply voltage-independent time references for wireless sensor networks (pp. 209–256). Springer.Google Scholar
- Demir, A, & Sangiovanni-Vincentelli, A. (1998). Analysis and simulation of noise in nonlinear electronic circuits and systems. Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
- Demir, A, Gu, C, Roychowdhury, J. (2010). Phase equations for quasi-periodic oscillators. In IEEE/ACM International conference on computer-aided design.Google Scholar
- Destexhe, A, Contreras, D, Steriade, M. (1998a). Mechanisms underlying the synchronizing action of corticothalamic feedback through inhibition of thalamic relay cells. Journal of Neurophysiology, 79(2), 999–1016.Google Scholar
- Destexhe, A, Mainen, Z F, Sejnowski, T J. (1998b). Kinetic models of synaptic transmission. In Koch, C, & Segev, I (Eds.) Methods in neuronal modeling: from synapses to networks (pp. 1–26). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- DiGiovanna, J, Nguyen, T, Guinand, N, Pérez-Fornos, A, Micera, S. (2016). Neural network model of vestibular nuclei reaction to onset of vestibular prosthetic stimulation. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 4.Google Scholar
- Esfahani, Z G, Gollo, L L, Valizadeh, A. (2016). Stimulus-dependent synchronization in delayed-coupled neuronal networks. Scientific Reports, 6.Google Scholar
- Gajic, Z, & Qureshi, MTJ. (2008). Lyapunov matrix equation in system stability and control. Courier Corporation.Google Scholar
- Gardiner, C. (1983). Handbook of stochastic methods for physics, chemistry and the natural sciences. Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
- Izhikevich, EM. (2007). Dynamical systems in neuroscience. MIT press.Google Scholar
- Kilinc, D, & Demir, A. (2015). Simulation of noise in neurons and neuronal circuits. In Proceedings of the IEEE/ACM international conference on computer-aided design (ICCAD) (pp. 589-596). IEEE.Google Scholar
- Kundert, K S, White, JK, Sangiovanni-Vincentelli, A. (1990). Steady-state methods for simulating analog and microwave circuits. Springer Science & Business Media.Google Scholar
- Mahmutoglu, AG, & Demir, A. (2014). Modeling and analysis of nonstationary low-frequency noise in circuit simulators: enabling non Monte Carlo techniques. In Proceedings of the international conference on computer-aided design (pp. 309–315). IEEE Press.Google Scholar
- Masugi-Tokita, M, Tarusawa, E, Watanabe, M, Molnár, E, Fujimoto, K, Shigemoto, R. (2007). Number and density of ampa receptors in individual synapses in the rat cerebellum as revealed by sds-digested freeze-fracture replica labeling. Journal of Neuroscience, 27(8), 2135–2144.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sharpeshkar, R. (2010). Ultra low power bioelectronics: fundamentals, biomedical applications, and bio-inspired system. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Winfree, AT. (2001). The geometry of biological time. Springer.Google Scholar