Journal of Computational Neuroscience

, Volume 36, Issue 3, pp 339–354 | Cite as

The role of multiple chemotactic mechanisms in a model of chemotaxis in C. elegans: different mechanisms are specialised for different environments

  • Peter A. Appleby


Unlike simpler organisms, C. elegans possesses several distinct chemosensory pathways and chemotactic mechanisms. These mechanisms and pathways are individually capable of driving chemotaxis in a chemical concentration gradient. However, it is not understood if they are redundant or co-operate in more sophisticated ways. Here we examine the specialisation of different chemotactic mechanisms in a model of chemotaxis to NaCl. We explore the performance of different chemotactic mechanisms in a range of chemical gradients and show that, in the model, far from being redundant, the mechanisms are specialised both for different environments and for distinct features within those environments. We also show that the chemotactic drive mediated by the ASE pathway is not robust to the presence of noise in the chemical gradient. This problem cannot be solved along the ASE pathway without destroying its ability to drive chemotaxis. Instead, we show that robustness to noise can be achieved by introducing a second, much slower NaCl-sensing pathway. This secondary pathway is simpler than the ASE pathway, in the sense that it can respond to either up-steps or down-steps in NaCl but not both, and could correspond to one of several candidates in the literature which we identify and evaluate. This work provides one possible explanation of why there are multiple NaCl sensing pathways and chemotactic mechanisms in C. elegans: rather than being redundant the different pathways and mechanism are specialised both for the characteristics of different environments and for distinct features within a single environment.


C. elegans Chemotaxis ASE Sodium chloride 


Supplementary material

10827_2013_474_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (33 kb)
PDF 33.1 KB


  1. Appleby, P.A. (2012). A model of chemotaxis and associative learning in C. elegans. Biological Cybernetics, 106, 373–387.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bargmann, C., & Horvitz, H. (1991). Chemosensory neurons with overlapping functions direct chemotaxis to multiple chemicals in C. elegans. Neuron, 7, 729–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chao, M., Komatsu, H., Fukuto, H., Dionne, H., Hart, A. (2004). Feeding status and serotonin rapidly and reversibly modulate a caenorhabditis elegans chemosensory circuit. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 101, 15512–15517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen, B., Hall, D., Chklovskii, D. (2006). Wiring optimization can relate neuronal structure and function. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 103, 4723–4728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dunn, N., Lockery, S., Pierce-Shimomura, J., Conery, J. (2004). A neural network model of chemotaxis predicts functions of synaptic connections in the nematode caenorhabditis elegans. Journal of Computational Neuroscience, 17, 137–147.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Eisenbach, M., & Lengeler, J. (2004). Chemotaxis. Imperial College Press.Google Scholar
  7. Ferrée, T., & Lockery, S. (1999). Computational rules for chemotaxis in the nematode C. elegans. Journal of Computational Neuroscience, 6, 263–277.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hall, D., & Russell, R. (1991). The posterior nervous system of the nematode caenorhabditis elegans: serial reconstruction of identified neurons and complete pattern of synaptic interactions. Journal of Neuroscience, 11, 122.Google Scholar
  9. Hills, T., Brockie, P., Maricq, A. (2004). Dopamine and glutamate control area-restricted search behavior in caenorhabditis elegans. Journal of Neuroscience, 24, 1217–1225.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hukema, R., Rademakers, S., Dekkers, M., Burghoorn, J., Jansen, G. (2006). Antagonistic sensory cues generate gustatory plasticity in caenorhabditis elegans. EMBO Journal, 25, 312–322.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Iino, Y., & Yoshida, K. (2009). Parallel use of two behavioural mechanisms for chemotaxis in caenorhabditis elegans. Journal of Neuroscience, 29, 5370–5380.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Izquierdo, E., & Lockery, S. (2010). Evolution and analysis of minimal neural circuits for klinotaxis in caenorhabditis elegans. Journal of Neuroscience, 30, 12908–12917.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Miller, A., Thiele, T., Faumont, S., Moravec, M., Lockery, S. (2005). Step-response analysis of chemotaxis in caenorhabditis elegans. Journal of Neuroscience, 25, 3369–3378.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Nuttley, W., Atkinson-Leadbeater, K., van der Kooy, D. (2002). Serotonin mediates food-odor associative learning in the nematode caenorhabditis elegans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 99, 12449–12454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Pierce-Shimomura, J., Dores, M., Lockery, S. (2005). Analysis of the effects of turning bias on chemotaxis in C. elegans. Journal of Experimental Biology, 208, 4727–4733.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Pierce-Shimomura, J., Morse, T., Lockery, S. (1999). The fundamental role of pirouettes in caenorhabditis elegans chemotaxis. Journal of Neuroscience, 19, 9557–9569.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Saeki, S., Yamamoto, M., Iino, Y. (2001). Plasticity of chemotaxis revealed by paired presentation of a chemoattractant and starvation in the nematode caenorhabditis elegans. Experimental Biology, 204, 1757–1764.Google Scholar
  18. Sambongi, Y., Nagae, T., Liu, Y., Yoshimizu, T., Takeda, K., Wada, Y., Futai, M. (1999). Sensing of cadmium and copper ions by externally exposed adl, ase, and ash neurons elicits avoidance response in caenorhabditis elegans. NeuroReport, 10, 753–757.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Stetak, A., Horndli, F., Maricq, A., van den Heuvel, S., Hajnal, A. (2009). Neuron-specific regulation of associative learning and memory by magi-1 in C. elegans. PLoS ONE, 4, e6019.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Suzuki, H., Thiele, T., Faumont, S., Ezcurra, M., Lockery, S., Schafer, W. (2008). Functional asymmetry in caenorhabditis elegans taste neurons and its computational role in chemotaxis. Nature, 454, 114–117.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Thiele, T., Faumont, S., Lockery, S. (2009). The neural network for chemotaxis to tastants in caenorhabditis elegans is specialized for temporal differentiation. Journal of Neuroscience, 29, 11904–11911.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Torayama, I., Ishihara, T., Katsura, I. (2007). Caenorhabditis elegans integrates the signals of butanone and food to enhance chemotaxis to butanone. Journal of Neuroscience, 27, 741–50.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ward, S. (1973). Chemotaxis by the nematode caenorhabditis elegans: identification of attractants and analysis of the response by use of mutants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 70, 817–821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ward, S., Thomson, N., White, J.G., Brenner, S. (1975). Electron microscopical reconstruction of the anterior sensory anatomy of the nematode caenorhabditis elegans. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 160, 313–337.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ware, R., Clark, D., Crossland, K., Russell, R. (1975). The nerve ring of the nematode caenorhabditis elegans: sensory input and motor output. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 162, 71–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. White, J., Southgate, E., Thomson, J., Brenner, S. (1986). The structure of the nervous system of the nematode C. elegans. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 314, 1–340.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Zhao, B., Khare, P., Feldman, L., Dent, J. (2003). Reversal frequency in caenorhabditis elegans represents an integrated response to the state of the animal and its environment. Journal of Neuroscience, 23, 5319–5328.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Kroto Research InstituteUniversity of SheffieldSheffieldUK

Personalised recommendations