Possible role of cooperative action of NMDA receptor and GABA function in developmental plasticity
- 148 Downloads
The maturation of cortical circuits is strongly influenced by sensory experience during a restricted critical period. The developmental alteration in the subunit composition of NMDA receptors (NMDARs) has been suggested to be involved in regulating the timing of such plasticity. However, this hypothesis does not explain the evidence that enhancing GABA inhibition triggers a critical period in the visual cortex. Here, to investigate how the NMDAR and GABA functions influence synaptic organization, we examine an spike-timing-dependent plasticity (STDP) model that incorporates the dynamic modulation of LTP, associated with the activity- and subunit-dependent desensitization of NMDARs, as well as the background inhibition by GABA. We show that the competitive interaction between correlated input groups, required for experience-dependent synaptic modifications, may emerge when both the NMDAR subunit expression and GABA inhibition reach a sufficiently mature state. This may suggest that the cooperative action of these two developmental mechanisms can contribute to embedding the spatiotemporal structure of input spikes in synaptic patterns and providing the trigger for experience-dependent cortical plasticity.
KeywordsSTDP Synaptic competition Critical period Neocortex
This study is partially supported by Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (KAKENHI (19700281), Young Scientists (B)) from the Japanese government. S.K. is partially supported by the Program to Accelerate the Internationalization of University Education from the Japanese government and the International Research Training Program from Yamagata University.
- Fagiolini, M., Katagiri, H., Miyamoto, H., Mori, H., Grant, S. G. N., Mishina, M., et al. (2003). Separable features of visual cortical plasticity revealed by N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor 2A signaling. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 100, 2854–2859.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gerstner, W., & Kistler, W. M. (2002). Spiking neuron models. Cambridge: Cambridge University.Google Scholar
- Hanover, J. L., Huang, Z. J., Tonegawa, S., & Stryker, M. P. (1999). Brain-derived neurotrophic factor overexpression induces precocious critical period in mouse visual cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 19, RC40.Google Scholar
- Ito, I., Futai, K., Katagiri, H., Watanabe, M., Sakimura, K., Mishina, M., et al. (1997). Synapse-selective impairment of NMDA receptor functions in mice lacking NMDA receptor epsilon 1 or epsilon 2 subunit. Journal of Physiology (London), 500(2), 401–408.Google Scholar
- Koch, C. (1999). Biophysics of computation. New York: Oxford University.Google Scholar
- Mierau, S. B., Meredith, R. M., Upton, A. L., & Paulsen, O. (2004). Dissociation of experience-dependent and -independent changes in excitatory synaptic transmission during development of barrel cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101, 15518–15523.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Quinlan, E. M., Olstein, D. H., & Bear, M. F. (1999a). Bidirectional, experience-dependent regulation of N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor subunit composition in the rat visual cortex during postnatal development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 96, 12876–12880.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tegnér, J., & Kepecs, Á. (2002). Why neuronal dynamics should control synaptic learning rules. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 14, 285–292.Google Scholar