Perceptions of Triple P-Positive Parenting Program Seminars among Parents Experiencing Homelessness
- 152 Downloads
Positive parenting has been identified as a potential protective factor for vulnerable children who experience homelessness; unfortunately, many parents experiencing homelessness struggle to provide the consistent warmth and appropriate discipline their children need. This study was designed to examine the opinions of parents residing in shelters about a brief evidence-based parenting seminar, Triple P-Positive Parenting Program. We used a mixed-methods sequential explanatory design using quantitative and qualitative methods. In phase I, we analyzed extant quantitative data on parents’ satisfaction with Triple P seminars via a survey administered following 66 seminars. Results showed the 284 sheltered parents’ ratings of satisfaction were even more positive than ratings of a convenience sample of 128 parents who attended Triple P seminars delivered in agencies that served parents having parenting challenges. In phase II, we explored sheltered parents’ views more deeply via qualitative data derived from 16 parents who attended a focus group immediately following three seminars. Results were integrated across methods and indicated that parents held generally positive views of Triple P, but when given the opportunity to discuss the seminars, they recommended many revisions to the content and some revisions to the methods of delivery. Most of their suggestions were made in response to the specific parenting challenges they faced while parenting in a crowded, highly structured shelter environment. Recommendations for adapting seminars for parents living in shelters and suggestions for future research are provided.
KeywordsTriple P Parenting intervention Shelters Family homelessness Parent perceptions
The authors gratefully acknowledge the Wake County Public School System for sharing the de-identified extant data.
M.E.H. designed the study, conducted focus groups, assisted with analyses, and co-wrote the manuscript. J.A. managed the data, assisted with analyses and co-wrote the manuscript. S.C. developed the focus group data coding system, led coding of the focus group data, and co-wrote the manuscript. K.A. conducted several of the seminars and reviewed drafts of the manuscript.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the focus groups in the study; other data were extant and de-identified, so signed consent was not required. All procedures were reviewed and approved by the NC State University IRB.
- Bassuk, E. L., DeCandia, C. J., Beach, C. A., & Berman, F. (2014). America’s youngest outcasts: A report card on child homelessness. Waltham, MA: The National Center on Family Homelessness at American Institutes for Research.Google Scholar
- Bassuk, E. L., DeCandia, C. J., & Richard, M. K. (2015). Services matter: How housing and services can end family homelessness. Needham, MA: The Bassuk Center.Google Scholar
- Bassuk, E. L., Richard, M. K., & Tsertsvadze, A. (2015). The prevalence of mental illness in homeless children: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 54, 86–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2014.11.008.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Creswell, J. W, Plano Clark, V. L, Gutmann, M. & Hanson, W. (2003). Advanced mixed methods research designs. In A. Tashakkori, C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook on mixed methods in the behavioral and social sciences. (pp. 209–240). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Cutuli, J. J., & Herbers, J. E. (2014). Promoting resilience for children who experience family homelessness: Opportunities to encourage developmental competence. Cityscape: A Journal of Policy Development and Research, 16, 113–140.Google Scholar
- Eyberg, S. M., & Funderburk, B. (2011). Parent–child interaction therapy protocol. Gainesville, FL: PCIT International.Google Scholar
- Gewirtz, A. H., & Taylor, T. (2009). Participation of homeless and abused women in a parent training program: Science and practice converge in a battered women’s shelter. In M. F. Hindsworth & T. B. Lang (Eds.), Community participation and empowerment (pp. 97–114). Hauppage, NY: Nova Science Publishers.Google Scholar
- Holtrop, K., McNeil, S., & McWey, L. M. (2015a). It’s a struggle but I can do it. I’m doing it for me and my kids: The psychosocial characteristics and life experiences of at-risk homeless parents in transitional housing. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 41, 177–191. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmft.12050.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Holtrop, K., Piehler, T. F., Gewirtz, A. H., & August, G. J. (2017). Observed parenting in families exposed to homelessness: Child and parent characteristics as predictors of response to the Early Risers intervention. In M. E. Haskett (Ed.), Child and family well-being and homelessness: Integrating research into practice and policy (pp. 27–48). New York, NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Holtrop, K., Chaviano, C. L., Scott, J. C., & Smith, S. M. (2015b). Identifying relevant components to include in a parenting intervention for homeless families in transitional housing: using parent input to inform adaptation efforts. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 85, 600–611. https://doi.org/10.1037/ort0000111.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Labella, M. H., Narayan, A. J., McCormick, C. M., Desjardins, C. D., & Masten, A. S. (2017). Risk and adversity, parenting quality, and children’s social-emotional adjustment in families experiencing homelessness. Child Development. https://doi.org/10.111/cdev.12894.Google Scholar
- Lee, S. S., August, G. J., Gewirtz, A. H., Klimes-Dougan, B., Bloomquist, M. L., & Realmuto, G. M. (2010). Identifying unmet mental health needs in children of formerly homeless mothers living in a supportive housing community sector of care. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 38, 421–432. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-009-9378-1.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sanders, M. R., Kirby, J. N., Tellegen, C. L., & Day, J. J. (2014). The Triple P-Positive Parenting Program: A systematic review and meta-analysis of a multi-level system of parenting support. Clinical Psychology Review, 34, 337–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2014.04.003.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shinn, M., Gibbons-Benton, J., & Brown, S. R. (2017). Poverty, homelessness, and family break-up. Child Welfare, 94, 105–122.Google Scholar
- U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Homeless Education (2015). Federal data summary: School years 2011–12 to 2013–14. http://www2.ed.gov/programs/homeless/data-comp-sy13-14.pdf.
- U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (2017). 2016 Annual Homeless Assessment Report to Congress. https://www.hudexchange.info/resources/documents/2016-AHAR-Part-1.pdf.
- Yu, M., North, C. S., Lavesser, P. D., Osborne, Va, & Spitznagel, E. L. (2008). A comparison of psychiatric and behavior disorders and cognitive ability among homeless and housed children. Community Mental Health Journal, 44, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-007-9100-0.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar