Journal of Child and Family Studies

, Volume 27, Issue 5, pp 1671–1681 | Cite as

Parental Reflective Functioning Affects Sensitivity to Distress in Mothers with Postpartum Depression

  • Stephanie Krink
  • Christine Muehlhan
  • Patrick Luyten
  • Georg Romer
  • Brigitte Ramsauer
Original Paper

Abstract

Parental reflective functioning (PRF) refers to the capacity of caregivers to reflect upon their children’s internal mental states and intentions, which is seen as crucial for parental sensitivity, defined as the adequate behavioral response to an infant’s signals. In this study, the effect of maternal PRF on sensitivity during the mother–infant interaction was examined in a clinical sample of 50 mothers who were experiencing postpartum depression and their infants aged three to 10 months. Mother and infant were exposed to emotional distress using the still-face procedure. It was hypothesized that low levels of PRF are associated with a decrease in maternal sensitivity in response to distress. Maternal PRF was assessed using the parental reflective functioning questionnaire (PRF). The subscales measured interest and curiosity in mental states, certainty about mental states (i.e., the recognition of the opacity of mental states), and pre-mentalizing modes (i.e., non-mentalizing modes), whereas sensitivity was evaluated using the maternal behavior Q-sort (Mini-MBQS-V). The results revealed a significant overall decrease in maternal sensitivity. As expected, the higher the scores on the pre-mentalizing modes, which indicated low levels of mentalizing through the mothers’ repudiation or defense against it, the greater the decreases in sensitivity. No effects with respect to the interest and curiosity in mental states or the certainty about mental states were found. Our findings determined that the pre-mentalizing modes are predictive of sensitivity to distress in mothers with postpartum depression.

Keywords

Postpartum depression Parental reflective functioning Maternal sensitivity Still-face procedure. 

Notes

Author Contributions

S.K. assisted with the sensitivity rating, preformed the statistical analyses, and prepared the manuscript. C.M.: assisted with the statistical analyses. P.L. participated in the preparation of the manuscript. G.R. participated in the preparation of the manuscript. B.R. principle investigator of the study prepared the manuscript.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

The ethics committee of the Medical Association of Hamburg authorized the overall project (reference number PV3269).

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from both parents.

References

  1. Ainsworth, M. D., Blehar, M. C., Waters, E., & Wall, S. (1978). Patterns of attachment—a psychological study of the strange situation. Oxford: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  2. American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.Google Scholar
  3. Beck, C. T. (1995). The effects of postpartum depression on maternal–infant interaction: A meta-analysis. Nursing Research, 44(5), 298–305.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beck, C. T. (1998a). The effects of postpartum depression on child development: A meta-analysis. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing, 12(1), 12–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beck, A. T., & Steer, R. A. (1987). Manual for the beck depression inventory. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
  6. Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., & Garbin, M. G. (1988b). Psychometric properties of the beck depression inventory: Twenty-five years of evaluation. Clinical Psychology Review, 8, 77–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bortz, J., & Schuster, C. (2010). Statistik für Human-und Sozialwissenschaftler (7th ed.). Berlin [ua]: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bouchard, M. A., Target, M., Lecours, S., Fonagy, P., Tremblay, L. M., Schachter, A., & Stein, H. (2008). Mentalization in adult attachment narratives: Reflective functioning, mental states, and affect elaboration compared. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 25, 47–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Braungart-Rieker, J., Garwood, M. M., Powers, B. R., & Notaro, P. C. (1998). Infant affect and affect regulation during the still-face paradigm with mothers and fathers: The role of infant characteristics and parental sensitivity. Developmental Psychology, 34(6), 1428–1437.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Burkhart, M. L., Borelli, J. L., Rasmussen, H. F., Brody, R., & Sbarra, D. A. (2017). Parental mentalizing as an indirect link between attachment anxiety and parenting satisfaction. Journal of Family Psychology, 31(2), 203.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Campbell, S. B., & Cohn, J. F. (1991). Prevalence and correlates of postpartum depression in first-time mothers. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 100(4), 594.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Carlson, E. A. (1998). A prospective longitudinal study of attachment disorganization/ disorientation. Child Development, 69, 1107–1128.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1998.tb06163.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Cicchetti, D. V. (1994). Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instrument in psychology. Psychological Assessment, 6(4), 284–290.  https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.6.4.284.Google Scholar
  14. Closa-Monasterolo, R., Gispert-Llaurado, M., Canals, J., Luque, V., Zaragoza-Jordana, M., Koletzko, B. & Verduci, E. (2017). The effect of postpartum depression and current mental health problems of the mother on child behaviour at eight years. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 21, 1563–1572.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Conradt, E., & Ablow, J. (2010). Infant physiological response to the still-face paradigm: Contributions of maternal sensitivity and infants’ early regulatory behavior. Infant Behavior and Development, 33(3), 251–265.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infbeh.2010.01.001.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Cordes, K., Smith-Nielsen, J., Tharner, A., Katznelson, H., Steele, H., Væver, M. S. (2017). Reflective functioning in postpartum depressed women with and without comorbid personality disorder. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 34(4), 414–421Google Scholar
  17. Cortina, J. M. (1993). What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 98–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Crockenberg, S. C., & Leerkes, E. M. (2003). Parental acceptance, postpartum depression, and maternal sensitivity: Mediating and moderating processes. Journal of Family Psychology, 17(1), 80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cummings, E. M., & Davies, P. T. (1994). Maternal depression and child development. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 35(1), 73–122.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. De Wolff, M. S., & van Ijzendoorn, M. H. (1997). Sensitivity and attachment: A meta-analysis on parental antecedents of infant attachment. Child Development, 68, 571–591.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ensink, K., Normandin, L., Plamondon, A., Berthelot, N., & Fonagy, P. (2016). Intergenerational pathways from reflective functioning to infant attachment through parenting. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue canadienne des Sciences Délután Comportement, 48(1), 9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Field, T. (2010). Postpartum depression effects on early interactions, parenting, and safety practices: A review. Infant Behavior and Development, 33(1), 1–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fischer-Kern, M., Fonagy, P., Kapusta, N. D., Luyten, P., Boss, S., Naderer, A., & Leithner, K. (2013). Mentalizing in female inpatients with major depressive disorder. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 201, 202–207.  https://doi.org/10.1097/NMD.0b013e3182845c0a.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Fonagy, P. (2000). Attachment and borderline disorder. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 48, 1129–1146.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fonagy, P., Gergely, G. & Target, M. (2007). The parent–infant dyad and the construction of the subjective self. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 48(3-4), 288–328.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01727.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Fonagy, P., Leigh, T., Steele, M., Steele, H., Kennedy, R., Mattoon, G., & Gerber, A. (1996). The relation of attachment status, psychiatric classification, and response to psychotherapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64, 22–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fonagy, P., Luyten, P., & Strathearn, L. (2011). Borderline personality disorder, mentalization, and the neurobiology of attachment. Infant Mental Health Journal, 32(1), 47–69.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Fonagy, P., & Target, M. (1997). Attachment and reflective function: Their role in self-organization. Development and Psychopathology, 9, 679–700.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579497001399.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Fonagy, P., & Target, M. (2006). Psychoanalyse und die Psychopathologie der Entwicklung. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta. Original 2003: Psychoanalytic Theories - Perspectives from Developmental Psychopathology.Google Scholar
  30. Fonagy, P., Target, M., Steele, H., & Steele, M. (1998). Reflective functioning manual, version 5.0, for application to adult attachment interviews. London, GB: Psychoanalysis Unit, Sub-Department of Clinical Health Psychology, University College London. Unpublished manual.Google Scholar
  31. Ghodsian, M., Zajicek, E., & Wolkind, S. (1984). A longitudinal study of maternal depression and child behaviour problems. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 25(1), 91–109.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Grienenberger, J., Kelly, K., & Slade, A. (2005). Maternal reflective functioning, mother-infant affective communication, and infant attachment: Exploring the link between mental states and observed caregiving behavior in the intergenerational transmission of attachment. Attachment & Human Development, 7, 299–311.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14616730500245963.Google Scholar
  33. Haley, D. W., & Stansbury, K. (2003). Infant stress and parent responsiveness: Regulation of physiology and behavior during still-face and reunion. Child Development, 74, 1534–1546.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00621.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Haltigan, J. D., Leerkes, E. M., Supple, A. J., & Calkins, D. (2013). Infant negative affect and maternal interactive behavior during the still face procedure: The moderating role of adult attachment states of mind. Attachment & Human Development, 16, 149–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. International Standard Classification of Education I S C E D. UNESCO (1997). http://www.unesco.org/education/information/nfsunesco/doc/isced_1997.htm.
  36. Leerkes, E. M. (2011). Maternal sensitivity during distressing tasks: A unique predictor of attachment security. Infant Behavior and Development, 34, 443–446.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lovejoy, M. C., Graczyk, P. A., O’Hare, E., & Neuman, G. (2000). Maternal depression and parenting behavior: A meta-analytic review. Clinical Psychology Review, 20, 561–592.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Luyten, P., & Blatt, S. J. (2012). Psychodynamic treatment of depression. Psychiatric Clinics, 35(1), 111–129.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Luyten, P., Mayes, L. C., Nijssens, L., & Fonagy, P. (2017). The parental reflective functioning questionnaire: Development and preliminary validation. Plosad- One, 12(5), e0176218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Luyten, P., Mayes, L. C., Sadler, L., Fonagy, P., Nicholls, S., Crowley, M., & Slade, A. (2009). The parental reflective functioning questionnaire-1 (PRFQ-1). Leuven: University of Leuven. Unpublished manual.Google Scholar
  41. Lyons-Ruth, K., Bureau, J. F., Easterbrooks, M. A., Obsuth, I., Hennighausen, K., & Vulliez-Coady, L. (2013). Parsing the construct of maternal insensitivity: Distinct longitudinal pathways associated with early maternal with-drawal. Attachment & Human Behavoir, 15, 562–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lyons‐Ruth, K., Zoll, D., Connell, D., & Grunebaum, H. U. (1986). The depressed mother and her one‐year‐old infant: Environment, interaction, attachment, and infant development. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 1986(34), 61–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Mayes, L. C., Carter, A. S., Egger, H. L., & Pajer, K. A. (1991). Reflections on stillness: Mothers’ reactions to the still-face Situation. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescence Psychiatry, 30, 22–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mills‐Koonce, W. R., Appleyard, K., Barnett, M., Deng, M., Putallaz, M., & Cox, M. (2011). Adult attachment style and stress as risk factors for early maternal sensitivity and negativity. Infant Mental Health Journal, 32(3), 277–285.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Moore, G. A., & Calkins, S. D. (2004). Infants’ vagal regulation in the still-face paradigm is related to dyadic coordination of mother-infant inter-action. Developmental Psychology, 40, 1068–1080.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.40.6.1068.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Moore, G. A., Hill-Soderlund, A. L., Propper, C. B., Calkins, S. D., Mills-Koonce, W. R., & Cox, M. J. (2009). Mother-infant vagal regulation in the face-to-face still-face paradigm is moderated by maternal sensitivity. Child Development, 80, 209–223.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01255.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Moran, G. (2009a). Mini-MBQS-V revised mini-MBQS 25 item for video coding. Ontario, CA: Western University. http://works.bepress.com/gregmoran/49/.Google Scholar
  48. Moran, G. (2009b). Mini-MBQS (25 items). Ontario, CA: Western University.Google Scholar
  49. Pederson, D. R., Moran, G., & Bento, S. (2009). Assessing Maternal sensitivity and the quality of mother-infant interactions using the maternal behaviour Q‐Sort (MBQS). Unpublished Manual.Google Scholar
  50. Pederson, D. R., Moran, G., Sitko, C., Campbell, K., Ghesquire, K., & Acton, H. (1990). Maternal sensitivity and the security of infant-mother attachment: A Q-sort study. Child Development, 61(6), 1974–1983. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2083509
  51. Pereira, J., Vickers, K., Atkinson, L., Gonzalez, A., Wekerle, C. & Levitan, R. (2012). Parenting stress mediates between maternal maltreatment history and maternal sensitivity in a community sample. Child Abuse Neglect, 36(5), 433–437.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2012.01.006.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Ramsauer, B., Lotzin, A., Mühlhan, C., Romer, G., Nolte, T., Fonagy, P., & Powell, B. (2014). A randomized controlled trial comparing Circle of Security Intervention and treatment as usual as interventions to increase attachment security in infants of mentally ill mothers: Study Protocol. BMC Psychiatry, 14, 1–11.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-14-24.Google Scholar
  53. Ramsauer, B., Lotzin, A., Quitmann, J. H., Becker‐Stoll, F., Tharner, A., & Romer, G. (2014). Insightfulness and later infant attachment in clinically depressed and nonclinical mothers. Infant Mental Health Journal, 35(3), 210–219.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Reck, C. (2007). Postpartale depression: Mögliche Auswirkungen auf die frühe Mutter-Kind-Interaktion und Ansätze zur psychotherapeutischen Behandlung. Praxis der Kinderpsychologie und Kinderpsychiatrie, 56, 234–244.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Rutherford, H. J., Booth, C. R., Luyten, P., Bridgett, D. J., & Mayes, L. C. (2015). Investigating the association between parental reflective functioning and distress tolerance in motherhood. Infant Behavior and Development, 40, 54–63.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Rutherford, H. J. V., Goldberg, B., Luyten, P., & Bridgett, D. J. (2013). Parental reflective functioning is associated with tolerance of infant distress but not general distress: Evidence for a specific relationship using a simulated baby paradigm. Infant Behavior & Development, 26, 635–641.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infbeh.2013.06.008.Google Scholar
  57. Sharp, C., & Fonagy, P. (2008). The parent’s capacity to treat the child as a psychological agent: Constructs, measures and implications for developmental psychopathology. Social Development, 17(3), 737–754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Slade, A. (2005). Parental reflective functioning: An introduction. Attachment & Human Development, 7, 269–281.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14616730500245906.Google Scholar
  59. Slade, A., Grienenberger, J., Bernbach, E., Levy, D., & Locker, A. (2005). Maternal reflective functioning, attachment, and the transmission gap: A preliminary study. Attachment & Human Development, 7, 283–298.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14616730500245880.Google Scholar
  60. Smaling, H. J. A., Huijbregts, S. C. J., Suurland, J., van der Heiden, K. B., Mesman, J., et al. (2016). Prenatal reflective functioning and accumulated risk as predictors of maternal interactive behavior during free play, the still-face paradigm, and two teaching tasks. Infancy, 21(6), 766–784. http://doi.org/10.1111/infa.12137.Google Scholar
  61. Stacks, A. M., Muzik, M., Wong, K., Beeghly, M., Huth-Bocks, A., Irwin, J. L., & Rosenblum, K. L. (2014). Maternal reflective functioning among mothers with childhood maltreatment histories: Links to sensitive parenting and infant attachment security. Attachment & Human Development, 16(5), 515–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Suchman, N., DeCoste, C., Castiglioni, N., Legow, N., & Mayes, L. (2008). The Mothers and Toddlers Program: Preliminary findings from an attachment-based parenting intervention for substance-abusing mothers. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 25(3), 499.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Suchman, N. E., DeCoste, C., Castiglioni, N., McMahon, T. J., Rounsaville, B., & Mayes, L. (2010). The Mothers and Toddlers Program, an attachment-based parenting intervention for substance using women: Post-treatment results from a randomized clinical pilot. Attachment & Human Development, 12(5), 483–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Tarabulsy, G. M., Provost, M. A., Bordeleau, S., Trudel-Fitzgerald, C., Moran, G., Pederson, D., & Pierce, T. (2009). Validation of a short version of the maternal behaviour Q-Set applied to a brief video record of mother-infant interaction [Abstract]. Infant Behavior and Development, 32, 132–136.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Taubner, S., Kessler, H., Buchheim, A., Kächele, H., & Staun, L. (2011). The role of mentalization in the psychoanalytic treatment of chronic depression. Psychiatry: Interpersonal & Biological Processes, 74(1), 49–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Trapolini, T., Ungerer, Ja, & McMahon, Ca (2008). Maternal depression: Relations with maternal caregiving representations and emotional availability during the preschool years. Attachment & Human Development, 10(1), 73–90.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14616730801900712.Google Scholar
  67. Tronick, E. Z., Als, H., Adamson, L., Wise, S., & Brazelton, T. B. (1978). The infant’s response to entrapment between contradictory messages in face-to-face interaction. Journal of American Academy of Child Psychiatry, 17, 1–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Weiner, B. (1985). An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Review, 92, 548–573.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Wittchen, H.-U., Wunderlich, U., Gruschwitz, S., & Zaudig, M. (1997). Strukturiertes Klinisches Interview für DSM-IV (SKID). Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stephanie Krink
    • 1
  • Christine Muehlhan
    • 1
  • Patrick Luyten
    • 2
  • Georg Romer
    • 1
  • Brigitte Ramsauer
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and PsychotherapyUniversity Hospital MuensterMuensterGermany
  2. 2.Faculty of Psychology and Educational SciencesUniversity of LeuvenLeuvenBelgium

Personalised recommendations