Journal of Child and Family Studies

, Volume 27, Issue 5, pp 1502–1512 | Cite as

Parents’ Views of Father–Child Rough-and-Tumble Play

  • Jennifer M. StGeorge
  • Jane C. Goodwin
  • Richard J. Fletcher
Original Paper

Abstract

Parent-child play directly influences child development. One aspect of parent-child play that is gaining interest is a form of physical play, ‘rough-and-tumble play’ (RTP), or roughhousing. RTP is most often played by fathers and has been shown to have positive benefits for children. However, little is known about parents’ perceptions of this type of play, although beliefs and values about learning through play shape parents’ interactions with their children. In this study, we investigated parents’ beliefs and knowledge about father–child RTP. A qualitative design was used to create a conceptual description of parents’ views, and 52 (31% male) Australian parents participated in semi-structured interviews supported by a video stimulus of father–child RTP. Three conceptual themes characterized parents’ perspectives on RTP: Strength Challenge describes the physicality and inter-personal challenge of the game; Dynamic Bonding describes how parents view RTP as fostering close father-child relationships, confidence and a playful state of mind; the final theme, Context and Caveats, integrates the contended and contingent aspects of RTP perceived to influence the short and long-term effects of this play. The study provides insight into how parents perceive the broad function of parent-child RTP and fathers’ role within this play.

Keywords

Rough-and-tumble play Father-child play Parents’ beliefs Fathers 

Notes

Author Contributions

J.StG. collaborated in the design of the study, lead the data analyses, and wrote the paper. J.G. analyzed the data and wrote part of the results. R.F. collaborated in the design and analysis of the study.

Funding

There was no funding associated with this project.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Approval No- H-2012-0327, University of Newcastle, Australia.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. Adamsons, K., & Buehler, C. (2007). Mothering versus fathering versus parenting: Measurement equivalence in parenting measures. Parenting: Science and Practice, 7, 271–303.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15295190701498686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barth, J. M., & Parke, R. D. (1993). Parent-child relationship influences on children’s transition to school. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 39, 173–195.Google Scholar
  3. Baumrind, D. (2013). Is a pejorative view of power assertion in the socialization process justified? Review of General Psychology, 17, 420–427.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bentley, G.F., Goodred, J.K., Jago, R., Sebire, S.J., Lucas, P.J., Fox, K.R.,… Turner, K.M. (2012). Parents’ views on child physical activity and their implications for physical activity parenting interventions: a qualitative study. BMC Pediatrics, 12, Document180.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431-12-180.
  5. Bornstein, M.H., Putnick, D.L., & Suwalsky, J.T. (2017). Parenting cognitions → parenting practices → child adjustment? The standard model. Development and Psychopathology, 1–18.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579417000931.
  6. Bowlby, J. (1988). A secure base: clinical applications of attachment theory.. East Sussex: Brunner-Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Brady-Smith, C, O’Brien, C, Berlin, L, Ware, A, Brooks-Gunn, J. (1999). Child-Parent Interaction Rating Scales for the Three-Bag Assessment 24-month wave. New York: National Center for Children and Families. http://policyforchildren.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/24mos_scales_final_42805.pdf.Google Scholar
  8. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101.  https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Braungart-Rieker, J., Garwood, M. M., Powers, B. P., & Wang, X. (2001). Parental sensitivity, infant affect, and affect regulation: Predictors of later attachment. Child Development, 72, 252–270.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Bretherton, I. (2010). Fathers in attachment theory and research: A review. Early Child Development and Care, 180, 9–23.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430903414661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bretherton, I., Lambert, J. D., & Golby, B. (2005). Involved fathers of preschool children as seen by themselves and their wives: Accounts of attachment, socialization, and companionship. Attachment & Human Development, 7, 229–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Burks, V.M., Carson, J., & Parke, R.D. (1987). Parent–child interactional styles of popular and rejected children. Unpublished manuscript, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL.Google Scholar
  13. Cabrera, N., Fitzgerald, H. E., Bradley, R. H., & Roggman, L. (2014). The ecology of father-child relationships: An expanded model. Journal of Family Theory and Review, 6, 336–354.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12054.Google Scholar
  14. Campbell, J. L., Quincy, C., Osserman, J., & Pedersen, O. K. (2013). Coding in-depth semistructured interviews: Problems of unitization and intercoder reliability and agreement. Sociological Methods & Research, 42, 294–320.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124113500475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Carlson, F. M. (2005). Significance of touch in young children’s lives. Young Children, 60, 79–85.Google Scholar
  16. Carson, J. L., Burks, V. M., & Parke, R. D. (1993). Parent-child physical play: Determinants and consequences. In K. MacDonald (Ed.), Parent-Child Play (pp. 197–221). New York: New York Press.Google Scholar
  17. Cevher-Kalburan, N., & Ivrendi, A. (2016). Risky play and parenting styles. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 25, 355–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Colliver, Y. (2016). Mothers’ perspectives on learning through play in the home. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 41(1), 4.Google Scholar
  19. Craig, L. (2006). Does father care mean fathers share? A comparison of how mothers and fathers in intact families spend time with children. Gender & Society, 20, 259–281.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243205285212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Crawley, S. B., & Sherrod, K. B. (1984). Parent-infant play during the first year of life. Infant Behavior and Development, 7, 65–75.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0163-6383(84)80023-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Darling, N., & Steinberg, L. (1993). Parenting style as context: An integrative model. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 487–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fagan, J., Day, R., Lamb, M. E., & Cabrera, N. J. (2014). Should researchers conceptualize differently the dimensions of parenting for fathers and mothers? Journal of Family Theory & Review, 6, 390–405.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fisher, K. R., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Golinkoff, R. M., & Gryfe, S. G. (2008). Conceptual split? Parents’ and experts’ perceptions of play in the 21st century. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 29, 305–316.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2008.04.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Flanders, J. L., Simard, M., Paquette, D., Parent, S., Vitaro, F., Pihl, R. O., & Seguin, J. R. (2010). Rough-and-tumble play and the development of physical aggression and emotion regulation: A five-year follow-up study. Journal of Family Violence, 25, 357–367.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-009-9297-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Flanders, J. L., Leo, V., Paquette, D., Pihl, R. O., & Seguin, J. R. (2009). Rough-and-tumble play and the regulation of aggression: An observational study of father-child play dyads. Aggressive Behavior, 35, 285–295.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.20309.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Fletcher, R., May, C., StGeorge, J., Morgan, P. J., & Lubans, D. R. (2011). Fathers’ perceptions of rough-and-tumble play: Implications for early childhood services. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 36, 131–138.Google Scholar
  27. Fletcher, R., StGeorge, J., & Freeman, E. (2013). Rough and tumble play quality: Theoretical foundations for a new measure of father-child interaction. Early Child Development and Care, 183, 746–759.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2012.723439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Flouri, E., Midouhas, E., Joshi, H., & Tzavidis, N. (2015). Emotional and behavioural resilience to multiple risk exposure in early life: The role of parenting. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 24, 745–755.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-014-0619-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Fogle, L. M., & Mendez, J. L. (2006). Assessing the play beliefs of African American mothers with preschool children. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 21, 507–518. doi: 10.1002/pits.10039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Friedman, R. C., & Downey, J. I. (2014). Sexual differentiation of childhood play: A contemporary psychoanalytic perspective. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 43, 197–211.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-013-0231-9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Ginsburg, K. R., American Academy of Pediatrics. (2007). Committee on Communications, Committee on Psychosocial Aspects of Child and Family Health. The importance of play in promoting healthy child development and maintaining strong parent-child bonds. Pediatrics, 119, 182–191.  https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2006-2697.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Gleason, T. R. (2005). Mothers’ and fathers’ attitudes regarding pretend play in the context of imaginary companions and of child gender. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 51, 412–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gong, F., Castaneda, D., Zhang, X., Stock, L., Ayala, L., & Baron, S. (2012). Using the associative imagery technique in qualitative health research: The experiences of homecare workers and consumers. Qualitative Health Research, 22, 1414–1424.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732312452935.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Grossmann, K., Grossmann, K. E., Kindler, H., & Zimmermann, P. (2008). A wider view of attachment and exploration: The influence of mothers and fathers on the development of psychological security from infancy to young adulthood. In J. Cassidy & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), Handbook of Attachment (2nd ed., pp. 857–879). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  35. Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? Field Methods, 18, 59–82.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Haight, W. L., Parke, R. D., & Black, J. E. (1997). Mothers’ and fathers’ beliefs about and spontaneous participation in their toddlers’ pretend play. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 43, 271–290.  https://doi.org/10.2307/23092492.Google Scholar
  37. Hurworth, R. (2004). Photo-interviewing. Qualitative Research Journal, 4, 73–79.Google Scholar
  38. Ivrendi, A., & Isikoglu, N. (2010). A Turkish view on fathers’ involvement in children’s play. Early Childhood Education Journal, 31, 519–526.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-010-0376-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kazura, K. (2000). Fathers’ qualitative and quantitative involvement: An investigation of attachment, play, and social interactions. Journal of Men’s Studies, 9, 41–57.  https://doi.org/10.3149/jms.0901.41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kerns, K. A., & Barth, J. M. (1995). Attachment and play: Convergence across components of parent-child relationships and their relations to peer competence. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 12, 243–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kochanska, G., & Kim, S. (2014). A complex interplay among the parent-child relationship, effortful control, and internalized, rule-compatible conduct in young children: evidence from two studies. Developmental Psychology, 50, 8–21.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032330.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Koustourakis, G. S., Rompola, C., & Asimaki, A. (2015). Rough and tumble play and gender in kindergarten: Perceptions of kindergarten teachers. International Research in Education, 3, 93–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lamb, M. E., & Stevenson, M. B. (1978). Father-infant relationships: Their nature and importance. Youth & Society, 9, 277–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lehrer, J. S., & Petrakos, H. H. (2011). Parent and child perceptions of Grade One children’s out of school play. Exceptionality Education International, 21, 74–92.Google Scholar
  45. Lewis, C., & Lamb, M. E. (2003). Fathers’ influences on children’s development: The evidence from two-parent families. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 18, 211–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lindsey, E., & Mize, J. (2000). Parent-child physical and pretense play: Links to children’s social competence. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 46, 565–591.Google Scholar
  47. Lunkenheimer, E. S., Olson, S. L., Hollenstein, T., Sameroff, A. J., & Winter, C. (2011). Dyadic flexibility and positive affect in parent-child coregulation and the development of child behavior problems. Development and Psychopathology, 23, 577–591.  https://doi.org/10.1017/s095457941100006x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. MacDonald, K., & Parke, R. D. (1984). Bridging the gap: Parent-child play interaction and peer interactive competence. Child Development, 55, 1265–1277.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. MacDonald, K., & Parke, R. D. (1986). Parent-child physical play: The effects of sex and age of children and parents. Sex Roles, 15, 367–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Manz, P. H., & Bracaliello, C. B. (2016). Expanding home visiting outcomes: Collaborative measurement of parental play beliefs and examination of their association with parents’ involvement in toddler’s learning. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 36, 157–167. doi: /10.1016/j.ecresq.2015.12.015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Martin, J. A. (1981). A longitudinal study of the consequences of early mother-infant interaction: A microanalytic approach. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 48(3), 1–58.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5834.ep11961853.Google Scholar
  52. McBride, B. A., Brown, G. L., Bost, K. K., Shin, N., Vaughn, B., & Korth, B. (2005). Paternal identity, maternal gatekeeping, and father involvement. Family Relations, 54, 360–372.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2005.00323.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Meikle, G. (2016). Social media: Communication, sharing and visibility. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  54. Nakamura, J., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2014). The concept of flow. Flow and the Foundations of PositivePsychology (pp. 239–263). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
  55. Paquette, D. (2004). Theorizing the father-child relationship: Mechanisms and developmental outcomes. Human Development, 47, 193–219.  https://doi.org/10.1159/000078723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Paquette, D., Bolte, C., Turcotte, G., Dubeau, D., & Bouchard, C. (2000). A new typology of fathering: Defining and associated variables. Infant and Child Development, 9, 213–230. https://doi.org/10.1002/1522-7219(200012)9:4 < 213::AID-ICD233 > 3.0.CO;2-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Paquette, D., Carbonneau, R., Dubeau, D., Bigras, M., & Tremblay, R. E. (2003). Prevalence of father-child rough-and-tumble play and physical aggression in preschool children. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 18, 171–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Parmar, P., Harkness, S., & Super, C. M. (2004). Asian and Euro-American parents’ ethnotheories of play and learning: Effects on preschool children’s home routines and school behaviour. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 28, 97–104.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01650250344000307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Patomaki, H., & Wight, C. (2000). After postpositivism? The promises of critical realism. International Studies Quarterly, 44, 213–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Pellegrini, A. (2012). Rough and tumble play from childhood through adolescence. Differing perspectives. In D. P. Fromberg, A. E. Bergen (Eds.), Play from birth to twelve: Contexts, perspectives and meanings (3rd ed., pp. 143–150). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  61. Pinto, A., Veríssimo, M., Gatinho, A., Santos, A. J., & Vaughn, B. E. (2015). Direct and indirect relations between parent–child attachments, peer acceptance, and self-esteem for preschool children. Attachment & Human Development, 17, 586–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Provençal, N., Booij, L., & Tremblay, R. E. (2015). The developmental origins of chronic physical aggression: biological pathways triggered by early life adversity. The Journal of Experimental Biology, 218, 123–133.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Rothlein, L., & Brett, A. (1987). Children’s, teachers’ and parents’ perceptions of play. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 2, 45–53.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0885-2006(87)90012-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Sandelowski, M., & Barroso, J. (2003). Classifying the findings in qualitative studies. Qualitative Health Research, 13, 905–923.  https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.111401.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Smith, P. K. (2010). Physical activity play: Exercise play and rough-and-tumble. In P. K. Smith (Ed.), Children and Play: Understanding Children’s Worlds (pp. 99–123). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  66. Staniloiu, A., & Markowitsch, H. (2012). Gender differences in violence and aggression – a neurobiological perspective. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 33, 1032–1036.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.01.279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. StGeorge, J. M., & Freeman, E. (2017). Measurement of father-child rough-and-tumble play and its relations to child behaviour. Infant Mental Health Journal, 38, 709–725.  https://doi.org/10.1002/imhj.21676.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Storli, R., & Sandseter, E. B. H. (2015). Preschool teachers’ perceptions of children’s rough-and-tumble play (R&T) in indoor and outdoor environments. Early Child Development & Care, 185, 1995–2009.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2015.1028394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Vedul-Kjelsås, V., Sigmundsson, H., Stensdotter, A. K., & Haga, M. (2012). The relationship between motor competence, physical fitness and self-perception in children. Child: Care, Health and Development, 38, 394–402.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2214.2011.01275.x.Google Scholar
  70. Verschueren, K., Buyck, P., & Marcoen, A. (2001). Self-representations and socioemotional competence in young children: A 3-year longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 37, 126–134.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.37.1.126.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. White, B. A., Jarrett, M. A., & Ollendick, T. H. (2013). Self-regulation deficits explain the link between reactive aggression and internalizing and externalizing behavior problems in children. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 35, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Yogman, M. W. (1981). Games fathers and mothers play with their infants. Infant Mental Health Journal, 2, 241–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Family Action CentreUniversity of NewcastleCallaghanAustralia
  2. 2.Institute of Health & SocietyNewcastle UniversityNewcastle upon TyneUK

Personalised recommendations