Advertisement

Journal of Child and Family Studies

, Volume 27, Issue 5, pp 1460–1472 | Cite as

Interparental Interactions and Adolescent Mood: A Daily Diary Approach

  • Christine E. Merrilees
  • Meghan P. McCormick
  • JoAnn Hsueh
  • Patricia Chou
  • E. Mark Cummings
Original Paper

Abstract

The literature assessing relations between interparental functioning and youth adjustment is extensive. Most of this literature used a between subjects approach and examines youth responses to conflict reported by parents. The current study used a daily diary approach to complement the existing literature by assessing relations between aspects of marital interactions and adolescent reported daily mood using a within-family approach. We hypothesized that parents’ emotionality during interactions, the severity of their marital conflicts, and the degree to which their conflicts were resolved would be associated with their adolescents’ daily moods. To test these hypotheses a diverse sample (N = 86; 27% Black, 33% White, 26% Hispanic, and 14% another race or families members differed in race) of mothers, fathers, and adolescents drawn from the Supporting Healthy Marriage project completed 15 days of daily diaries. Multilevel modeling results suggested differential associations between mother and father reports of their own emotions during interactions, conflict severity, and conflict resolution and adolescents’ daily moods. Overall, there were more significant results indicating fathers’ compared to mothers’ associations with adolescents’ daily moods, providing support for the need to continue efforts to engage fathers in family strengthening programs.

Keywords

Emotional security Daily diary Marital interactions Adolescence Low-income families 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Collection of the data described in this report was supported by the William T. Grant Foundation and Contract Number HHS-233-03-0034 from the Office of Planning, Research, and Evaluation, the Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services awarded to MDRC. Preparation of this report was supported by the William T. Grant Foundation. The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Office of Planning, Research, and Evaluation, the Administration for Children and Families, or the William T. Grant Foundation.

Author Contributions

C.E.M. contributed to study design and conceptualization, data analysis, and manuscript writing. M.P.M. analyzed the data, and contributed to writing the manuscript; J.H. contributed to study design and conceptualization, executed data collection, and contributed to writing feedback. P.C. contributed to data management and analysis. E.M.C. contributed to study design and analysis and manuscript feedback.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of MDRC, the University of Notre Dame, and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 289–300.Google Scholar
  2. Blakemore, S., & Choudhury, S. (2006). Development of the adolescent brain: implications for executive function and social cognition. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 47(3–4), 296–312.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2006.01611.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bolger, N., & Laurenceau, J. (2013). Intensive longitudinal methods: an introduction to diary and experience sampling research. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  4. Brock, R. L., & Kochanska, G. (2016). Interparental conflict, children’s security with parents, and long-term risk of internalizing problems: a longitudinal study from ages 2 to 10. Development and Psychopathology, 28(1), 45–54.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579415000279.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Brody, L. R., & Hall, J. A. (2010). Gender, emotion, and socialization. Handbook of gender research in psychology, vol 1: Gender research in general and experimental psychology (pp. 429–454). New York, NY: Springer Science+Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1465-1_21.Google Scholar
  6. Cheung, R. Y. M., Cummings, E. M., Zhang, Z., & Davies, P. T. (2016). Trivariate modeling of interparental conflict and adolescent emotional security: an examination of mother–father–child dynamics. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 45(11), 2336–2352.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-015-0406.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Cowan, P. A., & Cowan, C. P. (2014). Controversies in couple relationship education (CRE): Overlooked evidence and implications for research and policy. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 20(4), 361–383.  https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Crockenberg, S., & Forgays, D. K. (1996). The role of emotion in children’s understanding and emotional reactions to marital conflict. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 42(1), 22–47.Google Scholar
  9. Crockenberg, S., & Langrock, A. (2001). The role of specific emotions in children’s responses to interparental conflict: a test of the model. Journal of Family Psychology, 15(2), 163–182.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.15.2.163.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Cummings, E. M., & Davies, P. (1994). Children and marital conflict: the impact of family dispute and resolution. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  11. Cummings, E. M., & Davies, P. (1996). Emotional security as a regulatory process in normal development and the development of psychopathology. Development and Psychopathology, 8(1), 123–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cummings, E. M., & Davies, P. T. (2010). Marital conflict and children: an emotional security perspective. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  13. Cummings, E. M., Koss, K. J., & Davies, P. T. (2015). Prospective relations between family conflict and adolescent maladjustment: security in the family system as a mediating process. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 43(3), 503–515.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-014-9926-1.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Cummings, E. M., Goeke-Morey, M., & Papp, L. M. (2003). Children’s responses to everyday marital conflict tactics in the home. Child Development, 74(6), 1918–1929.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1467-8624.2003.00646.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Cummings, E. M., Goeke-Morey, M., & Papp, L. M. (2004). Everyday marital conflict and child aggression. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 32(2), 191–202.  https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JACP.0000019770.13216.be.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Cummings, E. M., Goeke-Morey, M., Papp, L. M., & Dukewich, T. L. (2002). Children’s responses to mothers’ and fathers’ emotionality and tactics in marital conflict in the home. Journal of Family Psychology, 16(4), 478–492.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.16.4.478.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Cummings, E. M., Merrilees, C. E., & George, M. W. (2010). Fathers, marriages, and families: revisiting and updating the framework for fathering in family context. The role of the father in child development (5th ed., pp.154–176). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Inc.Google Scholar
  18. Cummings, E. M., Schermerhorn, A. C., Davies, P. T., Goeke-Morey, M., & Cummings, J. S. (2006). Interparental discord and child adjustment: prospective investigations of emotional security as an explanatory mechanism. Child Development, 77(1), 132–152.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2006.00861.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Cummings, E. M., Simpson, K. S., & Wilson, A. (1993). Children’s responses to interadult anger as a function of information about resolution. Developmental Psychology, 29(6), 978–985.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.29.6.978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Curran, P. J., & Bauer, D. J. (2011). The disaggregation of within-person and between-person effects in longitudinal models of change. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 583–619.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100356.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Curran, P. J., Lee, T., Howard, A. L., Lane, S., & MacCallum, R. (2012). Disaggregating within-person and between-person effects in multilevel and structural equation growth models. In J. R. Harring & G. R. Hancock (Eds.), Advances in longitudinal methods in the social and behavioral sciences; advances in longitudinal methods in the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 217–253, Chapter xiii, 339). Charlotte, NC: IAPInformation Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  22. Davies, P. T., & Cummings, E. M. (1994). Marital conflict and child adjustment: an emotional Security hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 387–411.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Emery, R. E. (1982). Interparental conflict and the children of discord and divorce. Psychological Bulletin, 92(2), 310–330.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.92.2.310.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Fosco, G. M., & Grych, J. H. (2007). Emotional expression in the family as a context for children’s appraisals of interparental conflict. Journal of Family Psychology, 21(2), 248–258.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.21.2.248.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Goeke-Morey, M., Cummings, E. M., Harold, G. T., & Shelton, K. H. (2003). Categories and continua of destructive and constructive marital conflict tactics from the perspective of U.S. and welsh children. Journal of Family Psychology, 17(3), 327–338.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.17.3.327.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Goeke-Morey, M., Cummings, E. M., & Papp, L. M. (2007). Children and marital conflict resolution: implications for emotional security and adjustment. Journal of Family Psychology, 21(4), 744–753.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.21.4.744.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Goeke-Morey, M., Papp, L. M., & Cummings, E. M. (2013). Changes in marital conflict and youths’ responses across childhood and adolescence: a test of sensitization. Development and Psychopathology, 25(1), 241–251.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S095457941000995.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Grych, J. H., & Fincham, F. D. (1990). Marital conflict and children’s adjustment: a cognitive contextual framework. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 267–290.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Hsueh, J., Principe Alderson, D., Lundquist, E., Michalopoulos, C., Gubits, D., Fein, D., & Knox, V. (2012). The Supporting Healthy Marriage evaluation: early impacts on low-income families. New York, NY: MDRC.Google Scholar
  30. Iida, M., Shrout, P. E., Laurenceau, J., & Bolger, N. (2012). Using diary methods in psychological research. APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol. 1: Foundations, planning, measures, and psychometrics (pp. 277–305). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  31. Ingoldsby, E. M., Shaw, D. S., Owens, E. B., & Winslow, E. B. (1999). A longitudinal study of interparental conflict, emotional and behavioral reactivity, and preschoolers’ adjustment problems among low-income families. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 27(5), 343–356.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021971700656.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Kessler, R. C., Barker, P. R., Colpe, L. J., Epstein, J. F., Gfroerer, J. C., Hiripi, E., ... Zaslavsky, A. M. (2003). Screening for serious mental illness in the general population. Archives of General Psychiatry, 60, 184–189.  https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.60.2.184.
  33. Knox, V., Cowan, P. A., Pape Cowan, C., & Bildner, E. (2011). Policies that strengthen fatherhood and family relationships: what do we know and what do we need to know?Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 635(1), 216–239.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716210394769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Laurenceau, J., Barrett, L. F., & Rovine, M. J. (2005). The interpersonal process model of intimacy in marriage: a daily-diary and multilevel modeling approach. Journal of Family Psychology, 19(2), 314–323.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.19.2.314.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Laurenceau, J., & Bolger, N. (2005). Using diary methods to study marital and family processes. Journal of Family Psychology, 19(1), 86–97.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.19.1.86.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Little, R. J. A., & Rubin, D. B. (2002). Statistical analysis with missing data (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
  37. McCoy, K. P., George, M. R. W., Cummings, E. M., & Davies, P. T. (2013). Constructive and destructive marital conflict, parenting, and children’s school and social adjustment. Social Development, 22(4), 641–662.Google Scholar
  38. Rhoades, K. A. (2008). Children’s responses to interparental conflict: a meta-analysis of their associations with child adjustment. Child Development, 79, 1942–1956.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Rubin, D. B. (1987). Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
  40. Schermerhorn, A. C., Chow, S., & Cummings, E. M. (2010). Developmental family processes and interparental conflict: patterns of microlevel influences. Developmental Psychology, 46(4), 869–885.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019662.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Schoppe-Sullivan, S., Schermerhorn, A. C., & Cummings, E. M. (2007). Marital conflict and children’s adjustment: evaluation of the parenting process model. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69(5), 1118–1134.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2007.00436.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sears, M. S., Repetti, R. L., Reynolds, B. M., Robles, T. F., & Krull, J. L. (2015). Spillover in the home: the effects of family conflict on parents’ behavior. Journal of Marriage and Family,  https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12265.
  43. Singer, J. D., & Willett, J. B. (2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis: modeling change and event occurrence. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063–1070.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Weston, H. E., Boxer, P., & Heatherington, L. (1998). Children’s attributions about family arguments: implications for family therapy. Family Process, 37(1), 35–49.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Zarling, A. L., Taber-Thomas, S., Murray, A., Knuston, J. F., Lawrence, E., Valles, N., & Bank, L. (2013). Internalizing and externalizing symptoms in young children exposed to intimate partner violence: examining intervening processes. Journal of Family Psychology, 27(6), 945–955.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034804.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Psychology DepartmentSUNY GeneseoGeneseoUSA
  2. 2.Family and Children Policy AreaMDRCNew YorkUSA
  3. 3.Department of PsychologyUniversity of Notre DameNotre DameUSA

Personalised recommendations