Family Disruption and Social, Emotional and Behavioral Functioning in Middle Childhood
The association between family disruption and child socio-emotional and behavioral development is a relatively well-examined but as yet unresolved issue, and the conclusions of previous research have been ambiguous. Further, some studies have indicated that associations may depend on other risk factors, yet the question of heterogeneity has been relatively little discussed. The purpose of this cross-sectional study was to assess associations between family disruption on the one hand and teacher-rated and self-reported outcomes on subscales from the Behavior Assessment System for Children, 2nd edition (BASC-2) and the Behavior and Emotional Screening System (BESS) on the other, among a Danish sample of 817 normally developing schoolchildren. Specifically, we assessed (a) the extent to which background factors explained unadjusted associations and (b) whether associations were heterogeneous across the distribution of outcome measures. Results from ordinary least squares (OLS) models showed that relative to children from intact families, children from disrupted families had higher problem scores on BASC-2 subscales Externalizing Problems, Study Skills and School Problems even after controlling for a wide range of background factors. Quantile regression (QR) models showed that associations with Externalizing Problems and Study Skills were stronger among children with higher problem scores. Certain behavioral problems may therefore indicate increased vulnerability towards adverse events, such as family disruption. General screening for such problems could provide an opportunity to identify children in need of special attention and support against the potentially negative outcomes of family disruption for their school experience.
KeywordsFamily disruption Child development Socio-emotional and behavioral functioning Heterogeneity Quantile regression
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
The study was approved by the Danish Data Protection Agency. The study only involved survey data; for this type of study neither approval from the national Ethics Committee nor formal consent is required. Parents were informed about the study by letter, with the option to refuse permission for their child to participate.
- American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 4th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
- Cicchetti, D., & Toth, S. L. (1991). A Developmental Perspective on Internalizing and Externalizing Disorders. In D. Cichetti, & S. L. Toth (Eds.), Internalizing and Externalizing Expressions of Dysfunction. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- DiPerna, J. C., & Elliott, S. N. (2002). Promoting academic enablers to improve student achievement: An introduction to the mini-series. School Psychology Review, 31(3), 293–297.Google Scholar
- Hvidtfeldt, C., Eriksen, H.-L. F., & Sjö, N. M. (in preparation). Psychometric properties of a Danish tablet-version of the Behavioral and Emotional Screening System for Children.Google Scholar
- Kamphaus, R. W., & Reynolds, C. R. (2007). Behavioral and Emotional Screening System Manual. Bloomington, MN: Pearson Assessments.Google Scholar
- Li, J.-C. A. (2007). The Kids are OK: Divorce and Children’s Behavior Problems. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.Google Scholar
- Liu, S. (2007). Is My Parents’ Divorce to Blame for My Failure in Life? A joint Model of Child Educational Attainments and Parental Divorce. Working Papers 0610, University of Miami, Department of Economics. Miami, Florida: University of Miami.Google Scholar
- Liu, S. H. (2004). Parental divorce and child educational attainment (Order No. 3131275). Available from ABI/INFORM Collection; ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (305063620). Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/305063620?accountid=14468.
- Nederhof, E., Belsky, J., Ormel, J., & Oldehinkel, A. J. (2012). Effects of divorce on Dutch boys’ and girls’ externalizing behavior in Gene × Environment perspective: Diathesis stress or differential susceptibility in the Dutch Tracking Adolescents’ Individual Lives Survey Study? Development and Psychopathology, 24(3), 929–939.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Reynolds, C. R., & Kamphaus, R. W. (2004). Behavior Assessment System for Children, 2nd edn. Bloomington, MN: Pearson.Google Scholar
- Sommer, B., Verbeek, C., Low, A. M., Bencke, J., Curtis, D., & Sjö, N. M. (2010). Intensive resistance training and body weight supported treadmill training for children with acquired brain injuries: Project description and preliminary results. Parkinsonism and Related Disorders, 16, S85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Statistics Denmark. (2016). Living Arrangements for Children 2014. Retrieved from http://www.statistikbanken.dk/statbank5a/default.asp?w=1440.
- Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using Multivariate Statistics. 4th edn. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
- U.S. Census Bureau. (2016). Living Arrangements for Children Under 18 Years Old. 1960 to present. Retrieved from www.census.gov/hhes/families/data/children.html.
- Zeratsion, H., Bjertness, C. B., Bjertness, E., Dalsklev, M., Haavet, O. R., Halvorsen, J. A., Lien, L., & Claussen, B. (2015). The influence of parental divorce on educational ambitions of 18/19 year-old adolescents from Oslo, Norway. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 24(10), 2865–2873.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar