Evaluation of Violence Prevention Approaches Among Early Adolescents: Moderating Effects of Disability Status and Gender
- 711 Downloads
High prevalence rates of aggression during adolescence and associated adjustment difficulties for perpetrators and victims highlight the need for effective violence prevention programs. School-based prevention programs are advantageous as they occur in a key setting for youths' social and emotional development. The current study compared the efficacy of a combined universal violence prevention approach that included individual-level skill-building (i.e., lessons from Second Step) and school environment (i.e., Olweus Bullying Prevention Program; OBPP) interventions to OBPP alone. Participants were 231 sixth, seventh, and eighth graders (ages 11–15; M = 12.6, SD = 1.0) in middle school (48 % male, 67 % African American). A total of 14 classrooms were randomly assigned to the combined intervention (seven) or OBPP only comparison (seven) condition, split evenly across grades. Intervention effects were moderated by disability status and gender. Among students without disabilities those who received the combined intervention reported greater increases in anger regulation coping skills than those in the comparison condition. In contrast, among youth with disabilities greater increases in teacher-rated social skills were found for students in the combined intervention than students in the comparison condition at posttest. Gender-moderated effects included greater decreases in teacher ratings of externalizing problems and bullying behaviors for boys in the combined intervention versus the comparison condition at posttest. Study results inform school-based violence prevention programs and are discussed along with implications.
KeywordsViolence prevention Aggression Early adolescents Middle school
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
- Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
- Catalano, R. F., Haggerty, K. P., Oesterle, S., Fleming, C. B., & Hawkins, J. D. (2004). The importance of bonding to school for healthy development: Findings from the Social Development Research Group. The Journal of School Health, 74(7), 252–261. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2004.tb08281.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2012). Youth risk behavior surveillance—United States, 2011. MMWR, Surveillance Summaries 2012; 61(no. SS-4). Available from www.cdc.govmmwr/pdf/ss/ss6104.pdf.
- Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Committee for Children. (1997). Second step: A violence prevention curriculum: Middle school/junior high. Seattle, WA: Committee for Children. Level 1 foundation lessons.Google Scholar
- Committee for Children. (2008). Second Step: Student success through prevention program. Seattle, WA: Committee for Children.Google Scholar
- Elliott, S. N., & Gresham, F. M. (2008). SSIS intervention guide. Minneapolis, MN: NC: Pearson.Google Scholar
- Espelage, D. L. (2002). Bullying in early adolescence: The role of the peer group. Champaign, IL: ERIC Clearinghouse on Elementary and Early Childhood Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED471912).Google Scholar
- Farrell, A. D., Sullivan, T. N., Esposito, L. E., Meyer, A. L., & Valois, R. F. (2005). A latent growth curve analysis of the structure of aggression, drug use, and delinquent behaviors and their interrelations over time in urban and rural adolescents. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 15, 179–204. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-7795.2005.00091.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Howard, T., Dresser, S. G., & Dunklee, D. R. (2009). Poverty is not a learning disability: Equalizing opportunities for low SES students. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.Google Scholar
- Matjasko, J. L., Vivolo-Kantor, A. M., Massetti, G. M., Holland, K. M., Holt, M. K., & Cruz, J. D. (2012). A systematic meta-review of evaluations of youth violence prevention programs: Common and divergent findings from 25 years of meta-analyses and systematic reviews. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 17, 540–552. doi: 10.1016/j.avb.2012.06.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Melton, G. B., Limber, S. P., Cunningham, P., Osgood, D. W., Chambers, J., & Flerx, V., et al. (1998). Violence among rural youth. Final report. Washington: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.Google Scholar
- Olweus, D., & Limber, S. P. (2007). Olweus Bullying Prevention Program: Teacher guide. Center City, MN: Hazelden.Google Scholar
- Schroeder, B. A., Messina, A., Schroeder, D., Good, K., Barto, S., Saylor, J., & Masiello, M. (2012). The implementation of a statewide bullying prevention program: Preliminary findings from the field and the importance of coalitions. Health Promotion Practice, 13(4), 489–495. doi: 10.1177/1524839910386887.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sprague, J., Walker, H., Golly, A., White, K., Myers, D. R., & Shannon, T. (2001). Translating research into effective practice: The effects of a universal staff and student intervention on indicators of discipline and school safety. Education and Treatment of Children, 24, 495–511.Google Scholar
- Van Schoiack-Edstrom, L., Frey, K. S., & Beland, K. (2002). Changing adolescents´ attitudes about relational and physical aggression: An early evaluation of a school based intervention. School Psychology Review, 31, 201–216.Google Scholar
- Zins, J. E., Weissberg, R. P., Wang, M. C., & Walberg, H. J. (2004). Building academic success through social. Emotional learning: What does the research say? New York, NY: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar