Parentification of Adult Siblings of Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder
- 626 Downloads
Many typically-developing (TD) siblings provide care for their siblings with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), both as children and as adults. Research on parentification (i.e., when children assume responsibilities typically reserved for adults) has been mixed, with some studies supporting positive outcomes for TD siblings and others indicating negative outcomes. Some of these discrepancies may be due to inconsistencies in differentiating types of parentification. The current study examined how different types of parentification during childhood (retrospectively-reported) related to distress outcomes and attitudes about sibling relationships among 41 TD adult siblings of individuals with ASD. Results indicated that parent-focused parentification was positively related with anxiety and stress among TD siblings. Sibling-focused parentification was positively related to stress but was also related to more positive sibling relationship attitudes. Accounting for demographic variables and the other form of parentification, parent-focused parentification was a unique predictor of distress, whereas sibling-focused parentification was a unique predictor of positive sibling relationship attitudes. Although parentification is often viewed negatively, sibling-focused parentification and perceived benefits of parentification may predict positive outcomes. Results suggest that parentification may prove important in understanding the complex nature of sibling relationships. Specifically, strengthening the sibling bond and reducing parent-focused parentification during childhood may curtail sibling relationship problems and general distress in TD siblings later in life.
KeywordsAutism spectrum disorder Caregivers Parentification Relationship quality Adult siblings
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1954 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Burke, M. M., Taylor, J. L., Urbano, R., & Hodapp, R. M. (2012). Predictors of future caregiving by adult siblings of individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities. American Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 117, 33–47. doi: 10.1352/1944-7558-117.1.33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Cridland, E. K., Jones, S. C., Stoyles, G., Caputi, A. P., & Magee, C. A. (2015). Families living with autism spectrum disorder: Roles and responsibilities of adolescent sisters. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities , 1–12. doi: 10.1177/1088357615583466.
- Di Biasi, S., Trimarco, B., D’Ardia, C., Melogno, S., Meledrani, G., & Levi, G. (2016). Psychological adjustment, social responsiveness, and parental distress in an Italian sample of siblings of children with high-functioning autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 25, 883–890. doi: 10.1007/s10826-015-0256-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Fitzgerald, M. M., Schneider, R. A., Salstrom, S., Zinzow, H. M., Jackson, J., & Fossel, R. V. (2008). Child sexual abuse, early family risk, and childhood parentification: Pathways to current psychosocial adjustment. Journal of Family Psychology, 22, 320–324. doi: 10.1037/0893-3126.96.36.1990.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hooper, L. M. (2012). Parentification. In R. J. R. Levesque (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Adolescence. Vol 4, (pp. 2023–2031). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
- Hooper, L. M. (2009). Parentification Inventory. Tuscaloosa: Department of Educational Studies in Psychology, Research Methodology, and Counseling, The University of Alabama.Google Scholar
- Jurkovic, G. J. (1997). Lost Childhoods: The Plight of the Parentified Child. Philadelphia: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
- Jurkovic, G. J., Kuperminc, G., Perilla, J., Murphy, A., Ibanez, G., & Casey, S. (2004). Ecological and ethical perspectives on filial responsibility: Implications for primary prevention with immigrant latino adolescents. The Journal of Primary Prevention, 25, 81–104. doi: 10.1023/B:JOPP.0000039940.99463.eb.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lovibond, P. F., & Lovibond, S. H. (1995). The structure of negative emotional states: Comparison of the depression anxiety stress scales (DASS) with the beck depression and anxiety inventories. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 33, 335–343. doi: 10.1016/0005-7967(94)00075-U.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Portner, L. C. & Riggs, S. A. (2016). Sibling relationships in emerging adulthood: Associations with parent-child relationship. Journal of Child and Family Studies, Advance online publication. doi: 10.1007/s10826-015-0358-5.
- Stormshak, E. A., Bellanti, C. J., & Bierman, K. L., the Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group. (1996). The quality of sibling relationships and the development of social competence and behavioral control in aggressive children. Developmental Psychology, 32, 79–89. doi: 10.1037/0012-16188.8.131.52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar