Advertisement

Journal of Child and Family Studies

, Volume 25, Issue 6, pp 1829–1839 | Cite as

Preschool Children’s Prosocial Behavior: The Role of Mother–Child, Father–Child and Teacher–Child Relationships

  • Tiago Ferreira
  • Joana Cadima
  • Marisa Matias
  • Joana Marina Vieira
  • Teresa Leal
  • Paula Mena Matos
Original Paper

Abstract

Prosocial behavior is considered an important dimension of positive development. Although previous research suggests the quality of children’s early relationships may influence prosocial behaviors, the specific contributions of mother, father and teacher to children’s prosocial behavior have been less examined. This is a cross-sectional study that investigates (a) the combined associations between mother–, father– and teacher–child relationships, and prosocial behavior in 168 children aged 36–72 months, and (b) the mediating role of the teacher–child relationship in the association between the parent–child relationship and prosocial behavior. Results suggested a positive link between the quality of relationships with early caregivers and children’s prosocial behavior. The quality of both father– and teacher–child relationships were found to have a direct association with children’s prosocial behavior. The quality of the mother–child relationship was indirectly linked to children’s prosocial behavior, via the teacher–child relationship. Results suggesting connections between multiple relational contexts were discussed based on the notion of internal working models proposed by attachment theory. Mothers’ and fathers’ contributions to children’s prosocial behavior were also discussed considering differences on relational styles and changing roles of mothers and fathers from dual-earner families.

Keywords

Prosocial behavior Mother–child relationship Father–child relationship Teacher–child relationship 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by FEDER, COMPETE program, and by the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology, PTDC/MHC-CED/5218/2012 Grant.

References

  1. Bollen, K., & Stine, R. (1990). Direct and indirect effects: Classical and bootstrap estimates of variability. Sociological Methodology, 20, 115–140. doi: 10.2307/271084.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bonney, J., Kelley, M., & Levant, R. (1999). A model of fathers’ behavioural involvement in child care in dual-earner families. Journal of Family Psychology, 13, 401–415. doi: 10.1037/0893-3200.13.3.401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bowlby, J. (1988). A secure base: Parent–child attachment and healthy human development. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  4. Brophy-Herb, H., Schiffman, R., Bocknek, E., Dupuis, S., Fitzgerald, H., Horodynski, M., et al. (2010). Toddlers’ social-emotional competence in the contexts of maternal emotion socialization and contingent responsiveness in a low-income sample. Social Development, 20(1), 73–92. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9507.2009.00570.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bryant, B., & Crockenberg, S. (1980). Correlates and dimensions of prosocial behavior: A study of female siblings with their mothers. Child Development, 51(2), 529–544. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1980.tb02575.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Cabrera, N., Tamis-LeMonda, C., Bradley, R., Hofferth, S., & Lamb, M. (2000). Fatherhood in the twenty-first century. Child Development, 71(1), 127–136. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00126.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Cadima, J., Doumen, S., Verschueren, K., & Leal, T. (2013). Examining teacher–child relationship quality across two countries. Educational Psychology: An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology,. doi: 10.1080/01443410.2013.864754.Google Scholar
  8. Cadima, J., Verschueren, K., Leal, T., & Guedes, C. (2015). Classroom interactions, dyadic teacher–child relationships, and self–regulation in socially disadvantaged young children. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology,. doi: 10.1007/s10802-015-0060-5.Google Scholar
  9. Caprara, G., Barbaranelli, C., Pastorelli, C., Bandura, A., & Zimbardo, P. (2000). Prosocial foundations of children’s academic achievement. Psychological Science, 11(4), 302–306. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00260.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Carlo, G., Mestre, M., Samper, P., Tur, A., & Armenta, B. (2010). The longitudinal relations among dimensions of parenting styles, sympathy, prosocial moral reasoning, and prosocial behaviors. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 35(2), 116–124. doi: 10.1177/0165025410375921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Clark, K., & Ladd, G. (2000). Connectedness and autonomy support in parent-child relationships: Links to children’s socioemotional orientation and peer relationships. Developmental Psychology, 36(4), 485–498. doi: 10.1037//0012-1649.36.4.485.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Coffman, D., & MacCallum, R. (2005). Using parcels to convert path analysis models into latent variable models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 40(2), 235–259. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr4002_4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Dempster, A., Laird, N., & Rubin, D. (1977). Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 39(1), 1–38. doi: 10.2307/2984875.Google Scholar
  14. Denham, S. (1994). Mother–child emotional communication and preschoolers’ security of attachment and dependency. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 155(1), 119–121. doi: 10.1080/00221325.1994.9914765.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Eisenberg, N., Fabes, R., & Spinrad, T. (2006). Prosocial development. In N. Eisenberg (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Social emotional, and personality development (6th ed., pp. 646–718). New Jersey: Wiley.Google Scholar
  16. Enders, C. K. (2001). The performance of the full information maximum likelihood estimator in multiple regression models with missing data. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 61(5), 713–740. doi: 10.1177/0013164401615001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Garner, P. (2006). Prediction of prosocial and emotional competence from maternal behavior in African American preschoolers. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 12(2), 179–198. doi: 10.1037/1099-9809.12.2.179.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Goodman, R. (1997). The strengths and difficulties questionnaire: A research note. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 38, 581–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gottfried, A., Gottfried, A., & Bathurst, K. (2002). Maternal and dual-earner employment status and parenting. In M. Bornstein (Ed.), Handbook of parenting (Volume 2): Biology and ecology of parenting (pp. 207–228). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  20. Hallers-Haalboom, E. T., Mesman, J., Groeneveld, M. G., Endendijk, J. J., van Berkel, S. R., van der Pol, L. D., & Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J. (2014). Mothers, fathers, sons and daughters: Parental sensitivity in families with two children. Journal of Family Psychology, 28(2), 138–147. doi: 10.1037/a0036004.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Hastings, P., Utendale, W., & Sullivan, C. (2007). The socialization of prosocial development. In J. E. Grusec & P. D. Hastings (Eds.), Handbook of socialization: Theory and research (pp. 638–664). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  22. Hay, D., & Pawlby, S. (2003). Prosocial development in relation to children’s and mothers’ psychological problems. Child Development, 74(5), 1314–1327. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00609.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Hay, D., Payne, A., & Chadwick, A. (2004). Peer relations in childhood. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 45(1), 84–108. doi: 10.1046/j.0021-9630.2003.00308.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Howes, C. (2000). Social-emotional classroom climate in child care, child–teacher relationships and children’s second grade peer relations. Social Development, 9(2), 191–204. doi: 10.1111/1467-9507.00119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Howes, C., & Matheson, C. (1992). Contextual constraints on the concordance of mother–child and teacher–child relationship. In R. Pianta (Ed.), New directions for child development: Beyond the parent: The role of other adults in children’s lives (pp. 25–40). San-Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  26. Howes, C., Matheson, C., & Hamilton, C. (1994). Maternal, teacher, and child care history correlates of children’s relationships with peers. Child Development, 65, 264–273. doi: 10.2307/1131380.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. INE. (2011). Censos 2011. [2011 National Census]. Retrieved March 26, 2014, from http://censos.ine.pt/xportal/xmain?xpid=CENSOS&xpgid=censos2011_apresentacao
  28. Kamphaus, R., & Reynolds, C. (2006). Parenting relationship questionnaire. Minneapolis: NCS Pearson.Google Scholar
  29. Kärtner, J., Keller, H., & Chaudhary, N. (2010). Cognitive and social influences on early prosocial behavior in two sociocultural contexts. Developmental Psychology, 46(4), 905–914. doi: 10.1037/a0019718.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Kestenbaum, R., Farber, E., & Sroufe, L. (1989). Individual differences in empathy among preschoolers: Relation to attachment history. New Directions for Child Development, 44, 51–64. doi: 10.1002/cd.23219894405.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Kiang, L., Moreno, A., & Robinson, J. (2004). Maternal preconceptions about parenting predict child temperament, maternal sensitivity, and children’s empathy. Developmental Psychology, 40(6), 1081–1092. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.40.6.1081.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Kienbaum, J., Volland, C., & Ulich, D. (2001). Sympathy in the context of mother-child and teacher-child relationships. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 25(4), 302–309. doi: 10.1080/01650250143000076.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Koestner, R., Franz, C., & Weinberger, J. (1990). The family origins of empathic concern: A 26-year longitudinal study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(4), 709–717. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.58.4.709.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Lewis, C., & Lamb, M. (2003). Fathers’ influences on children’s development. The evidence from two-parent families. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 18, 211–228. doi: 10.1007/BF03173485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lindsey, E., Caldera, Y., & Rivera, M. (2013). Mother-child and father-child emotional expressiveness in Mexican-American families and toddlers’ peer interactions. Early Child Development and Care, 183, 378–393. doi: 10.1080/03004430.2012.711589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lindsey, E., Cremeens, P., & Caldera, Y. (2010). Mother–child and father–child mutuality in two contexts: Consequences for young children’s peer relationships. Infant and Child Development, 19, 142–160. doi: 10.1002/icd.Google Scholar
  37. Little, T., & Cunningham, W. (2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 151–173. doi: 10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Main, M., Kaplan, N., & Cassidy, J. (1985). Security in infancy, childhood, and adulthood: A move to the level of representation. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 50, 66–104. doi: 10.2307/3333827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Marzocchi, G. M., Capron, C., Di Pietro, M., Duran Tauleria, E., Duyme, M., Frigerio, A., et al. (2004). The use of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) in Southern European countries. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 13(2004), 40–46. doi: 10.1007/s00787-004-2007-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Matos, P. M. (2003). O conflito à luz da teoria da vinculação [An attachment theory perspective to conflict]. In M. E. Costa (Ed.), Gestão de conflitos na escola [Managing conflict at school] (pp. 143–191). Lisboa: Universidade Aberta.Google Scholar
  41. McBride, B., & Mills, G. (1993). A comparison of mother and father involvement with their preschool age children. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 8, 457–477. doi: 10.1080/03004430.2012.711596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Mitchell-Copeland, J., Denham, S., & Demulder, E. (1997). Q-sort assessment of child–teacher attachment relationships and social competence in the preschool. Early Education and Development, 8(1), 27–39. doi: 10.1207/s15566935eed0801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Myers, S., & Morris, A. (2009). Examining associations between effortful control and teacher-child relationships in relation to head start children’s socioemotional adjustment. Early Education and Development, 20(5), 756–774. doi: 10.1080/10409280802571244.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. O’Connor, E., & McCartney, K. (2006). Testing associations between young children’s relationships with mothers and teachers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 87–98. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.98.1.87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Parke, R. (2002). Fathers and families. In M. Bornstein (Ed.), Handbook of parenting: Vol 3. Being and becoming a parent (2nd ed., pp. 27–73). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  46. Pianta, R. (2001). Student–teacher relationship scale: Professional manual. Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
  47. Pianta, R., Hamre, B., & Stuhlman, M. (2003). Relationships between teachers and children. In W. Reynolds & G. Miller (Eds.), Handbook of psychology (Vol 7): Educational psychology (pp. 199–234). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  48. Pianta, R., & Stuhlman, M. (2004). Teacher–child relationships and children’s success in the first years of school. School Psychology Review, 33(3), 444–458.Google Scholar
  49. R Core Team. (2013). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Google Scholar
  50. Renk, K. (2005). Cross-informant ratings of the behavior of children and adolescents: The “gold standard”. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 14(4), 457–468. doi: 10.1007/s10826-005-7182-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Roopnarine, J., Fouts, H., Lamb, M., & Lewis-Elligan, T. (2005). Mothers’ and fathers’ behaviors toward their 3- to 4-month-old infants in lower, middle, and upper socioeconomic African American families. Developmental Psychology, 41(5), 723–732. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.41.5.723.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Roorda, D., Verschueren, K., Vancraeyveldt, C., Craeyevelt, S. Van, & Colpin, H. (2014). Teacher–child relationships and behavioral adjustment: Transactional links for preschool boys at risk. Journal of School Psychology, 52(5), 495–510. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2014.06.004.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48, 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sabol, T., & Pianta, R. (2012). Recent trends in research on teacher-child relationships. Attachment and Human Development, 14(3), 213–231. doi: 10.1080/14616734.2012.672262.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Schweizer, K. (2010). Some guidelines concerning the modeling of traits and abilities in test construction. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 26(1), 1–2. doi: 10.1027/1015-5759/a000001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sebanc, A. (2003). The friendship features of preschool children: Links with prosocial behavior and aggression. Social Development, 12(2), 249–268. doi: 10.1111/1467-9507.00232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Spivak, A., & Howes, C. (2011). Social and relational factors in early education and prosocial actions of children of diverse ethnocultural communities. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 57(1), 1–24. doi: 10.1353/mpq.2011.0002.Google Scholar
  58. Sroufe, L., & Fleeson, J. (1986). Attachment and the construction of relationships. In W. Hartup & Z. Rubin (Eds.), Relationships and development (pp. 51–72). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  59. Staub, E. (1992). The origins of caring, helping, and nonaggression: Parental socialization, the family system, schools, and cultural influence. In P. Oliner, L. Baron, L. Blum, D. Krebs, & M. Smolenska (Eds.), Embracing the other: Philosophical, psychological, and historical perspectives on altruism (pp. 390–412). New York, NY: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  60. Stayton, D., Hogan, R., & Ainsworth, M. (1971). Infant obedience and maternal behavior: The origins of socialization reconsidered. Child Development, 42, 1057–1069. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1971.tb02002.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Stone, L., Otten, R., Engels, R., Vermulst, A., & Janssens, J. (2010). Psychometric properties of the parent and teacher versions of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire for 4- to 12-year-olds: A review. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 13(3), 254–274. doi: 10.1007/s10567-010-0071-2.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  62. Vieira, J. M., Cadima, J., Leal, T., & Matos, P. M. (2013). Validation of a Portuguese version of the Parenting Relationship Questionnaire. In Poster session presented at the meeting of the 16th European Conference on Developmental Psychology (ECDP). Lausanne, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  63. Waters, E., Hay, D., & Richters, J. (1986). Infant–parent attachment and the origins of prosocial and antisocial behavior. In D. Olweus, J. Block, & M. Radke-Yarrow (Eds.), Development of antisocial and prosocial behavior: Research, theories, and issues (pp. 97–125). Orlando, Fl: Weissbrod Academic Press.Google Scholar
  64. Woerner, W., Fleitlich-Bilyk, B., Martinussen, R., Fletcher, J., Cucchiaro, G., Dalgalarrondo, P., et al. (2004). The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire overseas: evaluations and applications of the SDQ beyond Europe. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 13, 47–54. doi: 10.1007/s00787-004-2008-0.Google Scholar
  65. Yeung, J., Sandberg, J., Davis-Kean, P., & Hofferth, S. (2001). Children’s time with fathers in intact families. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 63, 136–154. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2001.00136.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Zahn-Waxler, C., Radke-Yarrow, M., Wagner, E., & Chapman, M. (1992). Development of concern for others. Developmental Psychology, 28(1), 126–136. doi: 10.1037//0012-1649.28.1.126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tiago Ferreira
    • 1
  • Joana Cadima
    • 1
  • Marisa Matias
    • 1
  • Joana Marina Vieira
    • 1
  • Teresa Leal
    • 1
  • Paula Mena Matos
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Center for PsychologyUniversity of PortoPortoPortugal

Personalised recommendations