The Influence of Co-offending Within a Moderated Mediation Model of Parent and Peer Predictors of Delinquency
Parental monitoring impacts adolescent delinquency both directly by limiting unsupervised activities and indirectly by limiting access to delinquent peers. Deviant peers may influence adolescent delinquency through a number of mechanisms, and there is a lack of clarity within the literature on distinctions between co-offending and deviant peer norms as influential mechanisms. Less is known about the impact of co-offending on the mediated relationship among parental monitoring, peer delinquency, and adolescent delinquency. The current study examined the relationship between parental monitoring, deviant peer behaviors, co-offending, and self-reported delinquency among 186 court-involved youth (12–18 years old) in a small city in the Midwest. The effects of parental monitoring on delinquency were partially mediated by delinquent peer affiliation. A moderated mediation model found that co-offending moderated the association between delinquent peer affiliation and delinquency, such that the relationship between peer delinquency and self-reported delinquency is stronger for those who co-offend.
KeywordsDelinquency Peer delinquency Parental monitoring Co-offending Court involved
This research was supported in part by the Center for Family and Demographic Research, Bowling Green State University, which has core funding from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R24HD050959-07).
- Akers, R. L. (1998). Social learning and social structure: A general theory of crime and deviance. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
- Crouter, A. C., & Head, M. R. (2002). Parental monitoring and knowledge of children. In M. Bornstein (Ed.), Handbook of parenting, 2nd ed., vol. 3: Becoming and being a parent (pp. 461–483). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Dodge, K. A., Dishion, T. J., & Lansford, J. E. (2006). Deviant peer influence in programs for youth: Problems and solutions. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Elliott, D. National Youth Survey [United States]: Wave I, 1976 [Computer File]. ICPSR08375-v2. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university. Bibliographic Citation: Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2008-08-01. doi: 10.3886/ICPSR08375.
- Elliott, D. S., & Menard, S. (1996). Delinquent friends and delinquent behavior: Temporal and developmental patterns. In J. David Hawkins (Ed.), Delinquency and crime: Current theories (pp. 28–67). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Goldweber, A., Dmitrieva, J., Cauffman, E., Piquero, A. R., & Steinberg, L. (2011). The development of criminal style in adolescence and young adulthood: Separating the lemmings from the loners. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 40(3), 332–346. doi: 10.1007/s10964-010-9534-5.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis a regression-based approach. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Keijsers, L., Branje, S., Hawk, S. T., Schwartz, S. J., Frijns, T., Koot, H. M., … & Meeus, W. (2011). Forbidden friends as forbidden fruit: Parental supervision of friendships, contact with deviant peers, and adolescent delinquency: Parental supervision of peer relationships. Child Development, no–no. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01701.x
- Lahey, B. B., Van Hulle, C. A., D’Onofrio, B. M., Rodgers, J. L., & Waldman, I. D. (2008). Is parental knowledge of their adolescent offspring’s whereabouts and peer associations spuriously associated with offspring delinquency? Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 36, 807–823.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mounts, N. S. (2008). Linkages between parenting and peer relationships: A model for parental management of adolescents peer relationships. In M. Kerr, H. Stattin, & R. Engels (Eds.), What can parents do: New insights into the role of parents in adolescent problem behaviour (pp. 163–189). West Sussex: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Patterson, G. R., Reid, J. B., & Dishion, T. J. (1992). Antisocial boys. Eugene, OR: Castalia.Google Scholar
- Patterson, G. R., & Yoerger, K. (1997). A developmental model for late-onset delinquency. In D. W. Osgood & J. McCord (Eds.), Motivation and delinquency (Vol. 44, pp. 119–177). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
- Reiss, A. J. (1986). Co-offender influences on criminal careers. Criminal Careers and Career Criminals, 2, 121–160.Google Scholar
- Simons, R. L., Whitbeck, L. B., & Wu, C. (1994a). Resilient and vulnerable adolescents (pp. 223–234). Families in troubled times: Adapting to change in rural America.Google Scholar
- Sutherland, E. H. (1947). Principles of criminology (4th ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott.Google Scholar
- Thornberry, T. P., & Krohn, M. D. (2000). The self-report method for measuring delinquency and crime. Criminal Justice, 4(1), 33–83.Google Scholar
- Tilton-Weaver, L. C., Burk, W. J., Kerr, M., & Stattin, H. (2013). Can parental monitoring and peer management reduce the selection or influence of delinquent peers? Testing the question using a dynamic social network approach. Developmental Psychology, 49(11), 2057–2070. doi: 10.1037/a0031854.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Weerman, F. M. (2004). The changing role of delinquent peers in childhood and adolescence: Issues, findings and puzzles. In G. Bruinsma, H. Elffers, & J. W. de Keijser (Eds.), Punishment, places and perpetrators: Developments in criminology and criminal justice research (pp. 279–297). Portland, OR: Willan Publishing.Google Scholar