Link Between Monitoring Behavior and Adolescent Adjustment: An Analysis of Direct and Indirect Effects
- 843 Downloads
The purpose of the current investigation was to explore whether monitoring behavior (i.e., parental solicitation, child disclosure, and parental involvement) was directly and indirectly (via parental knowledge and parent–youth openness) related to adolescent adjustment (i.e., antisocial behavior, substance use, and school grades). The sample consisted of 206 families with adolescents (ages 10–18 years) from predominantly low-income, high-risk neighborhoods. Monitoring behavior (parent reports), parental knowledge and parent–youth openness (youth reports), and adolescent adjustment (parent and youth reports) were all based on questionnaire data collected during a laboratory assessment. Results showed that when the monitoring behavior factors were examined simultaneously, only child disclosure was significantly and inversely related to youth antisocial behavior. In contrast, only parental involvement was significantly associated with less substance use. Moreover, school grades were significantly and incrementally predicted by both child disclosure and parental involvement. Parental solicitation was not significantly related to any of the adolescent outcomes. The findings also demonstrated evidence of indirect effects (via parental knowledge) in the link between monitoring behavior and adolescent adjustment. Implications regarding the socialization process during adolescence are discussed.
KeywordsParental monitoring Child disclosure Parenting Adolescents Antisocial behavior Academic achievement
This research was supported by the following grants: a United States Department of Agriculture, Oklahoma Agriculture Experiment Station Project grant (AB-1-13921) awarded to Michael Criss; an Oklahoma Center for the Advancement of Science and Technology (OCAST) Grant (AA-5-40772 and AA-5-45433; Project # HR11-130) awarded to Amanda Morris, Michael Criss, and Karina Shreffler; and a National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (AA-5-43382, 1R15HD072463-01) R15 Grant awarded to Amanda Morris, Michael Criss, and Jennifer Silk. We also would like to thank the families for participating in the project and the research staff of Family Youth & Development Project for their hard work and dedication to the project.
- Baumrind, D. (2013). Authoritative parenting revised: History and current status. In R. E. Larzelere, A. S. Morris, & A. W. Harrist (Eds.), Authoritative parenting: Synthesizing nurturance and discipline for optimal child development. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
- Criss, M. M., Shaw, D. S., Moilanen, K. L., Hitchings, J. E., & Ingoldsby, E. M. (2009). Family, neighborhood, and peer characteristics as predictors of child adjustment: A longitudinal analysis of additive and mediation models. Social Development, 18, 511–535. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9507.2008.00520.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gaertner, A. E., Rathert, J. L., Fite, P. J., Vitulano, M., Wynn, P. T., & Harber, J. (2010). Sources of parental knowledge as moderators of the relation between parental psychological control and relational and physical/verbal aggression. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 19, 607–616. doi: 10.1007/s10826-009-9345-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Laird, R. D., Criss, M. M., Pettit, G. S., Dodge, K. A., & Bates, J. E. (2008). Parents’ monitoring knowledge attenuates the link between antisocial friends and adolescent delinquent behavior. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 36, 299–310. doi: 10.1007/s10802-007-9178-4.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Laird, R. D., Marrero, M. D., Melching, J. A., & Kuhn, E. S. (2012). Information management strategies in early adolescence: Developmental change in use and transactional associations with psychological adjustment. Developmental Psychology. doi: 10.1037/a0028845.
- Laird, R. D., Pettit, G. S., Bates, J. E., & Dodge, K. A. (2003). Parents’ monitoring-relevant knowledge and adolescents’ delinquent behavior: Evidence of correlated developmental changes and reciprocal influences. Child Development, 74, 752–768. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00566.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Little, T. D., Lindenberger, U., & Nesselroade, J. R. (1999). On selecting indicators for multivariate measurement and modeling with latent variables: When ‘good’ indicators are bad and ‘bad’ indicators are good. Psychological Methods, 4, 192–211. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.4.2.192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- MacKinnon, D. P. (2008). Introduction to statistical mediation analysis. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis Group/Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Muthén, L. K. and Muthén, B. O. (1998–2010). Mplus user’s guide (6th edition). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
- Pianta, R. C. (2001). Student-teacher relationship scale: Professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources Inc.Google Scholar
- Simpkins, S. D., Bouffard, S. M., Dearing, E., Kreider, H., Wimer, C., Caronongan, P., et al. (2009). Adolescent adjustment and patterns of parents’ behaviors in early and middle adolescence. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 19, 530–557. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-7795.2009.00606.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Soenens, B., Vansteenkiste, M., Luyckx, K., & Goossens, L. (2006). Parenting and adolescent problem behavior: An integrated model with adolescent self-disclosure and perceived parental knowledge as intervening variables. Developmental Psychology, 42, 305–318. doi: 10.1037/0012-16126.96.36.1995.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Steinberg, L., Fletcher, A., & Darling, N. (1994). Parental monitoring and peer influences on adolescent substance use. Pediatrics, 93, 1060–1064.Google Scholar