Journal of Child and Family Studies

, Volume 19, Issue 3, pp 318–325 | Cite as

Intensive Home Based Services Within a Comprehensive System of Care for Youth

  • Eric L. Daleiden
  • Dawn Pang
  • Deborah Roberts
  • Lesley A. Slavin
  • Sarah L. Pestle
Original Paper


Within a comprehensive mental health service array for youth, Intensive Home Based Services (IHBS) are designed to meet the needs of youth with significant emotional and behavioral problems in their home communities, avoiding the need for out-of-home services, particularly residential care. We examined youth receiving IHBS as their first service in the state of Hawaii system of care (N = 163) to determine how successful IHBS were in preventing the need for more restrictive services within 12 months of intake. Subsequently, we investigated characteristics that might be predictive of a youth’s need for service intensification within 12 months. Logistic regression analyses found that greater age, level of service need, and functional impairment at intake predicted use of more restrictive services within 12 months of intake, whereas gender, ethnicity, diagnosis, service intensity, and clinician credentials did not. Overall, our findings suggested that IHBS were reasonably successful in preventing residential placements, and provided some basis for determining characteristics of youth likely to require more restrictive placements within a one year period.


Intensive home based services System of care Community mental health Residential care Least restrictive environment 


  1. American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Work Group on Systems of Care & American Association of Community Psychiatrists. (1999). Child and adolescent level of care utilization system (CALOCUS) user’s manual, version 1.1. Washington, DC: American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry & American Association of Community Psychiatrists.Google Scholar
  2. American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th edn, text revision). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barth, R. P., Greeson, J. K. P., Guo, S., Green, R. L., Hurley, S., & Sisson, J. (2007). Outcomes for youth receiving intensive in-home therapy or residential care: A comparison using propensity scores. The American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 77, 497–505. doi: 10.1037/0002-9432.77.4.497.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Chorpita, B. F., & Daleiden, E. (2009). Mapping evidence-based treatments for children and adolescents: Application of the distillation and matching model to 615 treatments from 322 randomized trials. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 77, 566–579.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Chorpita, B. F., Daleiden, E. L., & Weisz, J. R. (2005). Modularity in the design and application of therapeutic interventions. Applied & Preventive Psychology, 11, 141–156. doi: 10.1016/j.appsy.2005.05.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Daleiden, E., Lee, J., & Tolman, R. (2004). Annual evaluation report: Fiscal year 2004. Honolulu, HI: Hawaii Department of Health Child and Adolescent Mental Health Division. Retrieved April 16, 2009, from
  7. Fallon, T., Pumariega, A., Sowers, W., Klaehn, R., Huffine, C., Vaughan, T., et al. (2006). A level of care instrument for children’s systems of care: Construction, reliability, and validity. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 15, 143–145. doi: 10.1007/s10826-005-9012-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Farmer, E. M. Z., Mustillo, S., Burns, B. J., & Holden, E. W. (2008). Use and predictors of out-of-home placements within systems of care. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 16, 5–14. doi: 10.1177/1063426607310845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hawaii Departments of Education and Health. (2002). Interagency performance standards and practice guidelines. Honolulu, HI: Hawaii Department of Health Child and Adolescent Mental Health Division. Retrieved April 16, 2009, from
  10. Henggeler, S. W., Rowland, M. D., Halliday-Boykins, C., Sheidow, A. J., Ward, D. M., Randall, J., et al. (2003). One-year follow-up of multisystemic therapy as an alternative to the hospitalization of youths in psychiatric crisis. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 42, 543–551. doi: 10.1097/01.CHI.0000046834.09750.5F.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Hoagwood, K., Burns, B. J., Kiser, L., Ringeisen, H., & Schoenwald, S. K. (2001). Evidence-based practice in child and adolescent mental health services. Psychiatric Services (Washington, D.C.), 52, 1179–1189. doi: 10.1176/ Scholar
  12. Hodges, K. (1998). Child and adolescent functional assessment scale (CAFAS). Ann Arbor, MI: Functional Assessment Systems.Google Scholar
  13. Hodges, K., & Wong, M. M. (1996). Psychometric characteristics of a multidimensional measure to assess impairment: The child and adolescent functional assessment scale (CAFAS). Journal of Child and Family Studies, 5, 445–467. doi: 10.1007/BF02233865.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. James, S., Leslie, L. K., Hurlburt, M. S., Slymen, D. J., Landsverk, J., Davis, I., et al. (2006). Children in out-of-home care: Entry into intensive or restrictive mental health and residential care placements. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 14, 196–208. doi: 10.1177/10634266060140040301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kirk, R. S., & Griffith, D. P. (2004). Intensive family preservation services: Demonstrating placement prevention using event history analysis. Social Work Research, 28, 5–16.Google Scholar
  16. Lyons, J. S., & McCulloch, J. R. (2006). Monitoring and managing outcomes in residential treatment: Practice-based evidence in search of evidence-based practice. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 45, 247–251. doi: 10.1097/01.chi.0000190468.78200.4e.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Menard, S. (1995). Applied logistic regression analysis. Sage university paper series on quantitative applications in the social sciences, 07–106. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  18. Mueller, C. W., Tolman, R., Higa-McMillan, C., & Daleiden, E. (2009). Longitudinal predictors of youth functional improvement in a public mental health system. Journal of Behavioral Health Services and Research. doi: 10.1007/s11414-009-9172-4.
  19. Stroul, B., & Friedman, R. (1986). A system of care for severely emotionally disturbed children and youth. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Child Development Center, CASSP Technical Assistance Center.Google Scholar
  20. Tolman, R. T., Mueller, C. W., Daleiden, E. L., Stumpf, R. E., & Pestle, S. L. (2008). Outcomes from multisystemic therapy in a statewide system of care. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 17, 894–908. doi: 10.1007/s10826-008-9197-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eric L. Daleiden
    • 1
  • Dawn Pang
    • 2
  • Deborah Roberts
    • 2
  • Lesley A. Slavin
    • 2
  • Sarah L. Pestle
    • 3
  1. 1.Kismetrics, LLCSatellite BeachUSA
  2. 2.Child and Adolescent Mental Health Division, State of Hawaii Department of HealthHonoluluUSA
  3. 3.Department of PsychologyUniversity of HawaiiHonoluluUSA

Personalised recommendations