Journal of Child and Family Studies

, Volume 17, Issue 3, pp 437–454 | Cite as

Evaluating Child Coping Competence: Theory and Measurement

  • Angela D. Moreland
  • Jean E. Dumas
Original Paper


Much of the research on children’s coping styles is based on a downward extension of adult coping theories. In a departure from this approach, coping competence theory seeks to account for children’s ability to cope with daily challenges on the basis of developmental research. The theory, which states that challenges call for distinct coping skills in the affective, social, and achievement domains, was evaluated with an ethnically diverse sample of preschoolers. The study relied on confirmatory factor analysis of a parent-completed measure of coping to test the 3-factor model underlying the theory, and related those factors to parent and teacher measures of child functioning. Results supported the 3-factor model of coping competence and showed that each domain of coping was negatively correlated with parent and teacher ratings of child disruptive behavior. Coping competence theory held across child sex and age. Findings provide support for a 3-factor model of coping competence in early childhood and for the validity of the new parent-completed measure of children’s coping styles refined in this study.


Coping Childhood Confirmatory factor analysis Developmental 



This research was supported in part by grant MH/DA54171, co-funded by the National Institute of Mental Health, the National Institute on Drug Abuse, and the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (U.S. Department of Justice), by grant U81/CCU413401 funded by the National Center on Injury Prevention at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and by assistance from the South Carolina Department of Alcohol and Other Drug Abuse Services


  1. Arbuckle, J. L, & Wothke, W. (1999). Amos user’s guide version 3.6. Chicago: Smallwaters.Google Scholar
  2. Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blechman, E. A., Prinz, R. J., & Dumas, J. E. (1995). Coping, competence, and aggression prevention. Applied & Preventive Psychology, 4, 211–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Byrne, B. M. (1994). Burnout: Testing for the validity, replication, and invariance of causal structure across elementary, intermediate, and secondary teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 31, 64–673.Google Scholar
  5. Compas, B. (1987). Coping with stress during childhood and adolescence. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 393–403.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Compas, B., Conner-Smith, J., Saltzman, H., Thomsen, A., & Wadsworth, M. (2001). Coping with stress during childhood and adolescence: Problems, progress, and potential in theory and research. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 87–127.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dumas, J. E. (1997). Home and school correlates of early at-risk status: A transactional perspective. In R. F. Kronick (Ed.), At-risk youth: Theory, practice, reform. (pp. 97–117). New York: Garland.Google Scholar
  8. Dumas, J. E., Prinz, R. J., Smith, E. P., & Laughlin, J. (1999). The EARLY ALLIANCE prevention trial: An integrated set of interventions to promote competence and reduce risk for conduct disorder, substance abuse, and school failure. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 2, 37–53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Eisenberg, N., Fabes, R. A., & Guthrie, I. (1997). Coping with stress: The roles and regulation of development. In J. N. Sandler & S. A. Wolchik (Eds.), Handbook of children’s coping with common stressors: Linking theory, research, and intervention (pp. 41–70). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  10. Hoyle, R. H. (1995). Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  11. Hoza, B. &Owens, J. S. (2003). Diagnostic utility of the DSM-IV-TR symptoms in the prediction DSM-IV-TR ADHD subtypes and ODD. Journal of Attention Disorders, 7, 11–27.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hu, L. -T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Izard, C. E. (1984). Emotion-cognition relationships and human development. In C. E. Izard, J. Kagan, & R. B. Zajonc (Eds.), Emotions, cognition, and behavior (pp. 17–37). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with SIMPLIS command language. Chicago: Scientific Software International.Google Scholar
  15. Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping.New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  16. Lengua, L. J., West, S. G., & Sandler, I. N. (1998). Temperament as a predictor of symptomatology in children: Addressing contamination of measures. Child Development, 69(1), 164–181.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Moss, E., Gosselin, C., Parent, S., Rousseau, D., & Dumont, M. (1997). Attachment and joint problem solving experiences during the preschool period. Social Development, 6, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Nicholls, J. G., Licht, B. G., & Pearl, R. A. (1982). Some dangers of using personality questionnaires to study personality. Psychological Bulletin, 92, 572–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Normandeau, S., & Gobeil, A. (1998). A developmental perspective on children’s understanding of causal attributions in achievement-related situations. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 22, 611–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Pelham, W. E., Gnagy, E. M., Greenslade, K. E. & Milich, R. (1992). Teacher ratings of DSM-III-TR symptoms for the disruptive behavior disorders. Journal of the American Academy of Child Psychology, 31, 210–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Peters, R. (1988). Mental health promotion in children and adolescents: An emerging role for psychology. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 20, 389–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Prinz, R. J., Dumas, J. E., Smith, E. P. & Laughlin, J. E. (2000). The EARLY ALLIANCE prevention trial: A dual design to test reduction of risk for conduct problems, substance abuse, and school failure in childhood. Controlled Clinical Trials, 21, 286-302.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Querido, J. & Eyberg, S. (2003). Psychometric properties of the Sutter-Eyberg Student Behavior Inventory – Revised with preschool children, Behavior Therapy, 34, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Skinner, E. A. (1995). Perceived control, motivation, and coping. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  25. Smith, E. P., Prinz, R. J., Dumas, J. E., &Laughlin, J. E. (2001). Latent models of family processes in African American families: Relationships to child competence, achievement, and problem behavior. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63, 967–980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Waters, E., &Sroufe, L. A. (1983). Social competence as a developmental construct. Developmental Review, 3, 79–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Psychological SciencesPurdue UniversityWest LafayetteINUSA

Personalised recommendations