Advertisement

Journal of Computational Electronics

, Volume 13, Issue 2, pp 503–508 | Cite as

An impact of bias and structure dependent L\(_\mathrm{SD}\) variation on the performance of GaN HEMTs based biosensor

  • Niketa Sharma
  • Diksha Joshi
  • Nidhi Chaturvedi
Article

Abstract

In this paper, we discussed the effect of different bias and structures in relation to S-D distance variation on the device electrical and expected biosensing performance. Devices with source to drain length (\(L_{SD})\) variations from 3.5, 5.0, 8.0, 14.0, 26.0 to \(52~\upmu \)m were simulated at low and high bias voltages. Different structures having gate recess and finger variations were investigated for the complete range of \(L_{SD}\) variations. Small and very large \(L_{SD}\) variations in non-recessed structure showed good values of drain current \((I_{ds})\) and transconductances \((g_{m})\) at different low and high bias voltages respectively. Therefore expected response time and sensitivity could be improved by choosing a proper bias condition for different biosensing \(L_{SD}\) lengths. A gate recess structure showed better \(g_{m}\) values at low bias conditions for all \(L_{SD}\) lengths. However, \(I_{ds}\) degraded for these structures and hence the expected response time. The non-recessed structure variations in terms of number of fingers and gate width did not change the effective trends in \(L_{SD}\) variation.

Keywords

HEMTs Biosensors Transconductance Sensitivity Response time 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge Dr. Chandra Shekhar, director, CEERI and Dr. C. Dhanvantri, GL-ODG, CEERI, Pilani for their support and encouragement. Authors would also like to thank CSIR for funding under budget head PSC-201:Microsensys.

References

  1. 1.
    Chen, K.H., Kang, B.S., Wang, H.T., Lele, T.P., Ren, F., Wang, Y.L., Chang, C.Y., Pearton, S.J., Dennis, D.M., Johonson, J.W., Rajagopal, P., Roberts, J.C., Piner, E.L., Linthicum, K.J.: c-erB-2 sensing using AlGaN/GaN High electron mobility transistor for breast cancer detection. Appl. Phys. Lett. 92, 192103–192105 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Healy, D.A., Hayes, C.J., Leonard, P., McKenna, L., Kennedy, R.O.: Biosensor developments: application to prostate-specific antigen detection. Trends Biotechnol. 25, 125–131 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Streckfus, C., Bigler, L.: The use of soluble, salivary c-erbB-2 for the detection and post-operative follow-up of breast cancer in women: the results of a five-year translational research study. Adv. Dent. Res. 18, 17–24 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chen, K.H., Wang, H., Kang, B., Chang, C., Wamg, Y., Lele, T., Ren, F., Pearton, S., Dabiran, A., Osinsky, A., Chow, P.: Low Hg (II) ion concentration electrical detection with AlGaN/GaN high electron mobility transistor. Sens. Actuators Biochem. 134, 386–389 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kang, B., Ren, F., Wang, L., Lofton, C., Tan, W., Lele, T.P., Pearton, S., Dabiran, A., Osinsky, A., Chow, P.: Electrical detection of immobilized proteins with ungated AlGaN/GaN high electron mobility transistors. Appl. Phys. Lett. 87, 508–510 (2005)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ren, F., Pearton, S.: Semiconductor Device-Based Sensors for Gas, Chemical, and Bio Applications. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2011)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ambecher, O., Foutz, B., Smart, J., Shealy, J.R., Weimann, N.G., Chu, K., Murphy, M., Sierakowski, A.J., Schaff, W.J., Eastman, L.F., Dimitrov, R., Mitchell, A., Stutzmann, M.: Two dimensional electron gases induced by spontaneous and piezoelectric polarization in undoped and doped AlGaN/GaN heterostructures. J. Appl. Phys. 87, 334–344 (2000)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Osvald, J.: Polarization effects and energy band diagram in AlGaN/GaN heterostructure. Appl. Phys. A 87, 679–682 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gelmont, B., Kim, K.S., Shur, M.: Monte Carlo simulation of electron transport in gallium nitride. J. Appl. Phys. 74, 1818 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Smith, A.W., Brennan, K.F.: Hydrodynamic simulation of semiconductor devices. Prog. Quant. Electr. 21, 293–360 (1998)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Faraclas, E.W., Anwar, A.F.M.: AlGaN/GaN HEMTs: experiment and simulation of DC characteristics. Solid State Electron. 50, 1051–1056 (2006) Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Farahmand, M., et al.: Monte Carlo simulation of electron transport in III-nitride wurtzite phase material system: binaries and ternaries. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 48, 535–542 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ide, T., Shimizu, M., Yagi, S., Inada, M., Piao, G.: Low on-resistance AlGaN/GaN HEMTs by reducing gate length and source-gate length. Physica Status Solidi (c) 5, 1998–2000 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Russo, S., Carlo, A.Di, Ruythooren, W., Derluyn, J., Germain, M.: Scaling effects in AlGaN/GaN HEMTs: comparison between Monte Carlo simulations and experimental data. J. Comput. Electron. 5, 109–113 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CSIR-Central Electronics Engineering Research InstitutePilani India

Personalised recommendations