Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology

, Volume 30, Issue 1, pp 1–20 | Cite as

Intergenerational Living Arrangements in Myanmar and Thailand: A Comparative Analysis



The present study compares living arrangements and related intergenerational support in Myanmar and Thailand based on recent national surveys of older persons in both countries and prior surveys in Thailand. The countries share relatively similar cultural contexts but differ radically in economic development. Substantially higher percentages of older persons in Myanmar currently coreside with their children and are considerably more likely to have non-coresident children living in the same locality. They are also less likely to live with a spouse and to have children living at a substantial distance. Older persons in Myanmar are much less likely to have phone contact with children living away and less likely to receive visits. Thai elders are considerably more likely to provide custodial care to grandchildren with absent parents and to live in skip generation households. Older Thais are also considerably more likely to receive substantial remittances from non-coresident children. The living arrangements of older age Thais in the past, however, more closely resembles the current situation in Myanmar. It appears that current differences are largely attributable to the more advanced Thai economic development through its associated impacts on migration, fertility and mortality. Contrasting political situations and government priorities also likely play a role. The results provide insights into the implications of development for older persons and suggest that if the recent course of political transformation and opening to the global economy continues in Myanmar, living arrangements there may well follow the trends in Thailand over past decades.


Myanmar Thailand Aging Living arrangements Filial support Old age support Wellbeing of older persons Intergenerational support Impact of development Migration Grandchildren Material support Assistance with ADL Phone contact 



This research was supported by the Henry Luce Foundation through the Mekong Region Development Research Group at the University of Utah and by the Ratchadaphiseksomphot Endowment Fund of Chulalongkorn University (Grant no. RES560530174-AS). We would also like to thank Ms. Khin Mo Wai for her assistance in translating Burmese language material.


  1. Aboderin, I. (2004). Modernisation and ageing theory revisited: current explanations of recent developing world and historical western shifts in material family support for older people. Ageing and Society, 24, 29–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arber, S., & Timonen, V. (2012). Contemporary grandparenting: Changing family relationships in global contexts (pp. 51–70). Bristol: The Policy Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Asis, M. M. B., Domingo, L., Knodel, J., & Mehta, K. (1995). Living arrangements in four Asian countries: a comparative perspective. Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology, 10, 145–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bernard, A., Bell, M., & Charles-Edwards, E. (2014). Life-course transitions and the age profile of internal migration. Population and Development Review, 40(2), 213–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chayovan, N., & Knodel, J. (1997). A report of the survey of the welfare of the elderly in Thailand, IPS Publication 248/97. Bangkok: Institute of Population Studies, Chulalongkorn University, March 1997.Google Scholar
  6. Chayovan, N., Wongsith, M., & Saengtienchai, C. (1988). Socio-economic consequences of the ageing of the population in Thailand: Survey findings. Bangkok: Institute of Population Studies, Chulalongkorn University.Google Scholar
  7. Croll, E. (2006). The intergenerational contract in the changing Asian family. Oxford Development Studies, 34(4), 473–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Department of Population. (2014). The population and housing census of Myanmar, 2014: Summary of the provisional results. Yangon: UNFPA and Ministry of Population and Immigration.Google Scholar
  9. Engelmajert, P., & Izuhara, M. (2010). Spiritual debts and gendered costs, chapter 7. In M. Izuhara (Ed.), Ageing and international relations: Family reciprocity from a global perspective. Portland: The Policy Press.Google Scholar
  10. Fuller, T. (2013). Antiquated trades endangered in a rapidly changing Myanmar. New York Times, November 19, 2013.Google Scholar
  11. Hashimoto, A. (1991). Living arrangements of the aged in seven developing countries. Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology, 6(4), 359–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. HelpAge. (2013). Introduction to social protection benefits for old age. Yangon: HelpAge.Google Scholar
  13. Hendricks, J., & Yoon, H. (2006). The sweep of age and aging: Changing mores, changing policies. In J. Hendricks & H. Yoon (Eds.), Handbook of Asian aging (pp. 1–22). Amityville: Baywood Publishing.Google Scholar
  14. Hermalin, A. (2003). Theoretical perspectives, measurement issues, and related research. In A. Hermalin (Ed.), The well-being of the elderly in Asia: A four-country comparative study (pp. 101–141). Ann Arbor, Michigan: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  15. Hirschman, C., & Loi, V. M. (1996). Family and household structure in Vietnam: glimpses from a recent survey. Pacific Affairs, 69, 229–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. International Monetary Fund (IMF) (2013). World Economic Outlook Database, April 2013. Google Scholar
  17. International Organization for Migration (IOM) and Asian Research Center for Migration (ARCM), Chulalongkorn University. (2013). Assessing potential changes in the migration patterns of Myanmar migrants and their impact on Thailand. Bangkok: IOM Country Mission in Thailand.Google Scholar
  18. Knodel, J. (2012). The situation of older persons in Myanmar. Yangon: HelpAge International.Google Scholar
  19. Knodel, J. (2014). The situation of older persons in Myanmar—an overview. BOLD, 24(3), 9–16.Google Scholar
  20. Knodel, J., & Saengtienchai, C. (1999). Studying living arrangements of the elderly: lessons from a quasi qualitative case study approach in Thailand. Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology, 14(3), 197–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Knodel, J., Saengtienchai, C., & Sittitrai, W. (1995). The living arrangements of elderly in Thailand: views of the populace. Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology, 10, 79–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Knodel, J., Kespichayawattana, J., Wiwatwanich, S., & Saengtienchai, C. (2010). How left behind are rural parents of migrant children: evidence from Thailand. Ageing and Society, 30(5), 811–841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Knodel, J., Prachuabmoh, V., & Chayovan, N. (2013). The changing well-being of Thai elderly: An update from the 2011 survey of older persons in Thailand. Chiang Mai: HelpAge International.Google Scholar
  24. Litwak, E. (1960). Geographic-mobility and extended family cohesion. American Sociological Review, 25(3), 385–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Litwak, E., & Kulis, S. (1987). Technology, proximity, and measures of kin support. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 49(3), 649–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mason, K. O. (1992). Family change and support of the elderly in Asia: what do we know? Asia-Pacific Population Journal, 7(3), 13–32.Google Scholar
  27. National Statistical Office (NSO) (2003). Report on the 2002 Survey of Older Persons in Thailand. Bangkok: National Statistical Office.Google Scholar
  28. National Statistical Office (NSO) (2008). Report on the 2007 Survey of the Older Persons in Thailand. Bangkok: National Statistical Office.Google Scholar
  29. National Statistical Office (NSO) (2013). Report on the 2011 Survey of the Older Persons in Thailand. Bangkok: National Statistical Office.Google Scholar
  30. National Statistical Office (NSO). No date. Report of the 1994 Survey of Elderly in Thailand. Bangkok: National Statistical Office.Google Scholar
  31. Park, C.-Y., Khan, M. E., & Vandenberg, P. (2012). Myanmar in transition: Opportunities and challenges. Manila: Asian Development Bank.Google Scholar
  32. Risso-Gill, I., McKee, M., Coker, R., Plot, P., & Legido-Quigley, H. (2013). Health system strengthening in Myanmar during political reforms: perspectives from international agencies. Health Policy and Planning, 29, 1–9.Google Scholar
  33. Smith, G. C. (1998). Residential separation and patterns of interaction between elderly parents and their adult children. Progress in Human Geography, 22(3), 368–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Spoorenberg, T. (2013). Demographic changes in Myanmar since 1983: an examination of official data. Population and Development Review, 39, 309–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sun, J. (2013). Chinese older adults taking care of grandchildren: practices and policies for productive aging. Ageing International, 38, 58–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Suwanrada, W. (2012). Old-age allowance system in Thailand. 2013 Poverty in Focus 25:14–16.Google Scholar
  37. Timonen, V., & Arber, S. (2012). A new look at grandparenting. Chapter 1. In S. Arber & V. Timonen (Eds.), Contemporary grandparenting: Changing family relationships and global contexts (pp. 1–24). Bristol: The Policy Press.Google Scholar
  38. Tout, K. (1989). Ageing in developing countries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Treas, J., & Logue, B. (1986). Economic development and the older population. Population and Development Review, 12(4), 645–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. UNESCAP (2004). Population ageing, focus of regional seminar in Macau. Population Headliners No. 302, p1.Google Scholar
  41. United Nations (UN) (2002). Report of the second world assembly on aging: Madrid, 8–12 April 2002. Document A/CONF.197/9. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
  42. United Nations (UN). (2005). Living arrangements of older persons around the world. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
  43. United Nations (UN). (2013). World population prospects: The 2012 revision. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
  44. Wikipedia (2014). Kachin State. Retrieved from Accessed 31 Aug 2014.
  45. Wilson, G. (2007). Globalisation and support in old age. Education and Ageing, 16(2), 121–134.Google Scholar
  46. World NGO Forum on Ageing (2002). Final declaration and recommendations of the world and GOP forum on aging. Global Action on Aging at
  47. Zimmer, Z., & Kim, S. K. (2001). Living arrangements and socio-demographic conditions of older adults in Cambodia. Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology, 16, 353–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Population Studies CenterUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA
  2. 2.College of Population StudiesChulalongkorn UniversityBangkokThailand

Personalised recommendations