Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology

, Volume 23, Issue 3, pp 225–237 | Cite as

Age Discrimination Legislation in the U.K.: A Comparative and Gerontological Analysis

  • Rachel Filinson
Original Article


The three fold purpose of this study is to (1) review the incipient age discrimination legislation in the U.K., (2) offer comparisons with the U.S., Australia, and Canada and (3) examine the new legislation in relation to relevant gerontological theory and research. Reviewed are Britain’s Employment Equality Age Regulations, the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of the U.S., the Age Discrimination Act of 2004 in Australia, and Canadian Human Rights Act of 1985. A comparison of the new legislation on age discrimination in the U.K. with existing legislation of this type in the U.S., Canada, and Australia reveals that the British law appears to be weaker on many facets relative to those in the other countries. By permitting more exceptions to the law than are allowed under other types of civil rights statutes, restricting applicability of the law to the workplace, and maintaining compulsory retirement, the power of the law may be circumscribed. Gerontological theory and research do not, by and large, support these choices comprising the new British law.


Age discrimination Employment Australia Canada U.K. U.S. 



The author is grateful for the support of the Rhode Island College Faculty Fund and for the sabbatical leave granted by Rhode Island College to carry out this research. She is also appreciative of King’s College London, Institute of Gerontology, where she was able to work on this paper while a visiting scholar in 2006.


  1. A.A.R.P. (American Association of Retired Persons). (2004). Age discrimination at work. Retrieved October 20, 2004, from
  2. Adams, T., & Manthorpe, J. (2003). Age and opportunity? Nursing Older People, 15(9), 32–33, December.Google Scholar
  3. Alliance for Aging Research. (2003). Ageism: How healthcare fails the elderly. Retrieved December 21, 2005, from
  4. Bennington, L., & Wein, R. (2000). Anti-discrimination legislation in Australia: Fair, effective, efficient or irrelevant? International Journal of Manpower, 21(1), 21–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Canadian Human Rights Commission (Canada). (2003). A guide to the Canadian Human Rights Act. Retrieved December 18, 2005, from
  6. (2004). Why do older workers have fewer protections against age discrimination? Retrieved December 20, 2005, from
  7. Cohen, S. (2001). The complex nature of ageism: What is it? Who does it? Who perceives it? The Gerontologist, 41(5), 576–577.Google Scholar
  8. Collier, E. (2005). Latent age discrimination in mental health care. Mental Health Practice, 8(6), 42–45, March.Google Scholar
  9. Connor, S. (2005). Ageism ‘bigger problem than racism or sexism’. The Independent, 7 September.Google Scholar
  10. Department of Health (United Kingdom). (2001). National service framework for older people: Short summary. Retrieved January 8, 2004, from
  11. Department of Trade and Industry (2005a). Equality and diversity: Coming of age (consultation on the draft Employment Equality (Age) Regulations 2006). Retrieved December 15, 2005, from
  12. Department of Trade and Industry (2005b). Partial regulatory impact assessment (age discrimination). Retrieved December 15, 2005, from
  13. Dobson, R. (2005). Age discrimination denies elderly people a “dignified death”. British Journal of Medicine, 330(7503), 1288, 4 June.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Drabsch, T. (2004). Ageing in Australia. Briefing Paper No 12/04, NSW Parliamentary Library. Retrieved December 17, 2005, from
  15. Duncan, C., & Loretto, W. (2004). Never the right age? Gender and age-based discrimination in employment. Gender, Work and Organization, 11(1), 95–115, January.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Encel, S. (1999). Age discrimination in employment in Australia. Ageing International, 25(2), 69–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Encel, S. (2001). Age discrimination in Australia: Law and practice. In Z. Hornstein (Ed.), Outlawing age discrimination (pp. 17–30). Bristol, UK: Policy.Google Scholar
  18. Encel, S. (2004). Age discrimination in law and in practice. Elder Law Review, 3. Retrieved December 19, 2005, from 3.
  19. Federal Discrimination Law 2005. Retrieved October 8, 2007, from
  20. Frolik, L. A., & Barnes, A. M. (2007). Elder law: Cases and materials (4th ed.). Newark, NJ: Lexis Nexis.Google Scholar
  21. Gagne v. Northwestern Ins. Co., 881 F.2d 309, 314 (1989).Google Scholar
  22. Gallo, W. T., Bradley, E. H., Siegel, M., & Kasl, S. (2000). Health effects of involuntary job loss among older workers: Findings from the health and retirement survey. Journal of Gerontology, 55B(3), S131–S140.Google Scholar
  23. General Dynamics Land Systems v. Cline 540 U.S. 581 (2004).Google Scholar
  24. Greater Vancouver Regional District Employees’ Union v. Greater Vancouver Regional District BCJ No 2026 BCCA 435 (2001).Google Scholar
  25. Gunderson, M. (2001). Age discrimination legislation in Canada. In Z. Hornstein (Ed.), Outlawing age discrimination (pp. 31–42). Bristol, UK: Policy.Google Scholar
  26. Hamilton v. Caterpillar Inc. 966 F.2d 1226, 1228 (7th Cir. 1992).Google Scholar
  27. Hazen Paper vs. Biggins 507 U.S. 604 113 S. Ct. 1701 (1993).Google Scholar
  28. Hornstein, Z. (2001). Outlawing age discrimination. Bristol, UK: Policy.Google Scholar
  29. Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission (Australia). (2004). All about age discrimination. Retrieved December 17, 2005, from
  30. Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission (Australia). (2006). Commission’s Annual Report for 2005–2006 (chapter 4). Retrieved October 12, 2007, from
  31. International Longevity Center (Anti-Ageism Taskforce). (2006). Ageism in America. Retrieved October 8, 2007, from
  32. Johnson v. Minnesota Historical Soc’y, 931 F.2d 1239, 1243, 8th Cir. (1991).Google Scholar
  33. Kimel v. Florida Board of Regents 528 U.S. 62 (2000).Google Scholar
  34. Kinsella, K., & Phillips, D. R. (2005). Global aging: The challenge of success. Population Bulletin, 60, 1, March. Retrieved August 1, 2005, from Scholar
  35. Lane, C. (2005). Threshold eased for age-bias lawsuits. Washington Post. 3/31, AO1.Google Scholar
  36. Levenson, R. (2003). Institutional ageism. Community Care(1481), 42–43.Google Scholar
  37. McCann, L. (2003). Age discrimination law—The slow drag to 2006. Retrieved October 20, 2004, from–05–03-ia-perspectives.htm.
  38. Miller, J., Birnie, S., Dutton, K., & Elliott, P. (2004). Implementing the single assessment process using the Minimum Data Set—Home Care: A pilot study. Nursing Older People, 16(9), 14–18, December.Google Scholar
  39. Munshi, S. K., Bell, S. L., Vijayakumar, N., & Warwick, G. (2003). Ageism in renal replacement therapy. Nursing Older People, 15(9), 14–16, December.Google Scholar
  40. Nelson, T. D. (2005). Ageism: Prejudice against our feared future self. Journal of Social Issues, 61(2), 207–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Neumark, D. (2001). Age discrimination legislation in the U.S.: Assessment of the evidence. In Z. Hornstein (Ed.), Outlawing age discrimination (pp. 43–62). Bristol, UK: Policy.Google Scholar
  42. Noonan, A. E. (2005). “At this point now”: Older worker reflections on their current employment experience. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 61(3), 211–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. OECD (Economics Department). (2004). The labor force participation of older workers. Retrieved December 19, 2005, from
  44. Ontario Human Rights Commission. (2007). Annual report, 2006–2007. Retrieved October 12, 2007, from
  45. Palmore, E. B. (2004). Research note: Ageism in Canada and the United States. Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology, 19, 41–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Parkinson, W. (2004). Multi-disciplinary person-centred care: Has government policy helped or hindered? Nursing Older People, 16(7), 14–17, October.Google Scholar
  47. Posner, R. A. (1995). Aging and old age. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  48. Public Employee Retirement System of Ohio v. Betts 109 S. Ct. 256 (1989).Google Scholar
  49. Pulse (2003). GPs hailed for their care of the elderly. Pulse, 63(13), 4.Google Scholar
  50. Productivity Commission (Australia). (2005). Economic implications of an ageing Australia. Retrieved December 19, 2005, from
  51. Ranzijn, R., Carson, E., Winefield, A.H., & Price, D. (2006). On the scrap-heap at 45: The human impact of mature aged unemployment. Journal of Occupational and Organization Psychology, 79, 467–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc. 530 U.S. 133 (2000).Google Scholar
  53. Roberts, Y. (2003). Latest big idea will sustain inequality. Community Care(1493), 23.Google Scholar
  54. Rowe, J. W., & Kahn, R. L. (1998). Successful aging: The Macarthur Foundation study. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
  55. Shelton v. The Boeing Company, 399 F.3d 909, 8th Cir. (2005).Google Scholar
  56. Smith v. City of Jackson 125 S. Ct. 1536 (2005).Google Scholar
  57. Special Committee on Aging (U.S.). (2000). U.S. Senate Report 106.s.Rep 229 (February 7).Google Scholar
  58. Walt, A. (2004). The treatment of age and age discrimination in employment in the United States, Canada, and South Africa. Elder Law Review, 3. Retrieved December 19, 2005, from 3.
  59. World Health Organization. (2002) Active aging: A policy framework. Retrieved December 19, 2005, from

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Gerontology CenterRhode Island CollegeProvidenceUSA

Personalised recommendations