Molecular docking and 3D-quantitative structure activity relationship analyses of peptidyl vinyl sulfones: Plasmodium Falciparum cysteine proteases inhibitors
- 297 Downloads
Comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA) and comparative molecular similarity indices analysis (CoMSIA) based on three-dimensional quantitative structure–activity relationship (3D-QSAR) studies were conducted on a series (39 molecules) of peptidyl vinyl sulfone derivatives as potential Plasmodium Falciparum cysteine proteases inhibitors. Two different methods of alignment were employed: (i) a receptor-docked alignment derived from the structure-based docking algorithm GOLD and (ii) a ligand-based alignment using the structure of one of the ligands derived from a crystal structure from the PDB databank. The best predictions were obtained for the receptor-docked alignment with a CoMFA standard model (q 2 = 0.696 and r 2 = 0.980) and with CoMSIA combined electrostatic, and hydrophobic fields (q 2 = 0.711 and r 2 = 0.992). Both models were validated by a test set of nine compounds and gave satisfactory predictive r 2 pred values of 0.76 and 0.74, respectively. CoMFA and CoMSIA contour maps were used to identify critical regions where any change in the steric, electrostatic, and hydrophobic fields may affect the inhibitory activity, and to highlight the key structural features required for biological activity. Moreover, the results obtained from 3D-QSAR analyses were superimposed on the Plasmodium Falciparum cysteine proteases active site and the main interactions were studied. The present work provides extremely useful guidelines for future structural modifications of this class of compounds towards the development of superior antimalarials.
KeywordsFalcipain-2 Peptidyl vinyl sulfone Malaria CoMFA CoMSIA Docking
We are grateful for the financial support from Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT, Portugal) to CIQ-UP and CICECO, for the Program Ciência 2007 and for the Post-doctoral fellowship SFRH/BPD/62967/2009 awarded to Cátia Teixeira. We also thank FCT and the European Union (FEDER) for funding through Project refs. PTDC/QUI/65142/2006 and FCOMP-01-0124-FEDER-007418, respectively.
- 5.Gardner MJ, Hall N, Fung E, White O, Berriman M, Hyman RW, Carlton JM, Pain A, Nelson KE, Bowman S, Paulsen IT, James K, Eisen JA, Rutherford K, Salzberg SL, Craig A, Kyes S, Chan MS, Nene V, Shallom SJ, Suh B, Peterson J, Angiuoli S, Pertea M, Allen J, Selengut J, Haft D, Mather MW, Vaidya AB, Martin DM, Fairlamb AH, Fraunholz MJ, Roos DS, Ralph SA, McFadden GI, Cummings LM, Subramanian GM, Mungall C, Venter JC, Carucci DJ, Hoffman SL, Newbold C, Davis RW, Fraser CM, Barrell B (2002) Nature 419(6906):498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Rosenthal PJ, Olson JE, Lee GK, Palmer JT, Klaus JL, Rasnick D (1996) Antimicrob Agents Chemother 40(7):1600Google Scholar
- 14.Ettari R, Bova F, Zappala M, Grasso S, Micale N (2010) Med Res Rev 30(1):136Google Scholar
- 17.MarvinSketch 5.2.2, 2009, ChemAxon (http://www.chemaxon.com)
- 18.Sybyl X 1.3, Tripos Software, St. Louis, USAGoogle Scholar
- 22.Case DA, Darden TA, Cheatham TE, Simmerling CLI, Wang J, Duke RE, Luo R, Crowley M, Walker RC, Zhang W, Merz KM, Wang B, Hayik S, Roitberg A, Seabra G, Kolossváry KF, Wong KF, Paesani F, Vanicek F, Wu X, Brozell SR, Steinbrecher T, Gohlke H, Yang L, Tan C, Mongan J, Hornak V, Cui G, Mathews DH, Seetin MG, Sagui C, Babin V, Kollman PA (2008) AMBER 10. University of California, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
- 29.Gramatica P (2004) Evaluation of different statistical approaches for the validation of quantitative structure-activity relationships. Final report for JRC Contract ECVA-CCR.496576-Z. European Chemicals Bureau, Joint Research Centre, European Commission, Ispra, ItalyGoogle Scholar