Journal of Computer-Aided Materials Design

, Volume 14, Supplement 1, pp 253–258 | Cite as

Proton generation and transport in the fuel cell environment: atomistic computer simulations

  • Eckhard Spohr


Hydrogen atoms in direct methanol fuel cells are produced ’in situ’ by dissociation of methanol on precious metal catalysts (Pt, Pt/Ru) in an aqueous environment. The abstraction of the first hydrogen atom via C–H bond cleavage is generally considered to be the rate-limiting step of dissociative methanol adsorption on the catalyst surface. This oxidation reaction on platinum particles in a fuel cell is investigated by means of a combined approach of classical molecular dynamics (MD) simulations and ab initio calculations in order to obtain an understanding of the role of the solvent for the stabilization of intermediates and for the enhancement of proton desorption from the catalyst surface and subsequent transfer into the nearby polymer electrolyte membrane (PEM). The anodically generated protons need to migrate efficiently through the membrane to the cathode were they are consumed. At the same time water and methanol (in a direct methanol fuel cell) transport should be slow. Humidified PEMs are considered to consist of a nanometer-scale phase-separated bicontinuous network of polymer regions providing structural integrity, and of aqueous regions providing the pathways for proton conduction. MD simulations provide a powerful theoretical tool for the investigation and clarification of the relationship between molecular structure and these transport phenomena. In order to atomistically model larger fractions of a humidified PEM, a coarse-grained model of humidified polymer electrolyte membranes has been developed.


Proton transport Fuel cell membranes Molecular dynamics simulations Density functional theory (DFT) Electrocatalytic methanol oxidation 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Kreuer, K.-D., Paddison, S.J., Spohr, E., Schuster, M.: Transport in proton conductors for fuel-cell applications: simulations, elementary reactions, and phenomenology. Chem. Rev. 104, 4637–4678 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hartnig, C., Spohr, E.: The role of water in the initial steps of methanol oxidation on Pt(111). Chem. Phys. 319, 185–191 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hartnig, J., Spohr, E.: The role of water in the initial steps of methanol oxidation on Pt(211). Electrochim. Acta 52, 2236–2243 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chen, Y.X., Heinen, M., Jusys, Z., Behm, R.J.: Kinetics and mechanism of the electrooxidation of formic acid—spectroelectrochemical studies in a flow cell. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 45, 981–985 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hartnig, C., Grimminger, J., Spohr, E.: Adsorption of formic acid on Pt(111) in the presence of water. J. Electroanal. Chem. 607, 133–139 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hartnig, C., Grimminger, J., Spohr, E. (in preparation)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Commer, P., Hartnig, C., Seeliger, D., Spohr, E.: Modeling of proton transfer in polymer electrolyte membranes on different time and length scales. Mol. Simul. 30, 775–763 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Spohr, E., Commer, P., Kornyshev, A.A.: Enhancing proton mobility in polymer electrolyte membranes: lessons from molecular dynamics simulations. J. Phys. Chem. B 106, 10560–10569 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Commer, P., Cherstvy, A.G., Spohr, E., Kornyshev, A.A.: The effect of water content on proton transport in polymer electrolyte membranes. Fuel Cells 2, 127–136 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Walbran, S., Kornyshev, A.A.: Proton transport in polarizable water. J. Chem. Phys. 114, 10039– (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Vishynakov, A., Neimark, A.V.: Molecular dynamics simulation of microstructure and molecular mobilities in swollen Nafion membrances. J. Phys. Chem. B 105, 9586–9594 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jang, S.J., Molinero, V., Cagin, T., Goddard, W.A.: III Nanophase-segregation and transport in Nafion 117 from molecular dynamics simulations: effect of monomeric sequence. J. Phys. Chem. B 108, 3149–3157 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Seeliger, D., Hartnig, C., Spohr, E.: Aqueous pore struture and proton dynamics in solvated Nafion membranes. Electrochim. Acta 50, 4234–4240 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Blake, N.P., Petersen, M.K., Voth, G.A., Metiu, H.: Structure of hydrated Na-Nafion polymer membranes. J. Phys. Chem. B 109, 24244–24253 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Devanathan, R., Venkatnathan, A., Dupuis, M.: Atomistic simulation of Nafion membrane: I. Effect of hydration on membrane nanostructure. . J. Phys. Chem. B 111, 8069–8079 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Spohr, E.: Monte Carlo simulations of a simple lattice model of polymer electrolyte membranes. J. Mol. Liquids 136, 288–293 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Eikerling, M., Kulikovsky, A.A., Kornyshev, A.: Can theory help to improve fuel cells? Fuel Cell Rev., pp. 15–24. December 2004/January 2005Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Lehrstuhl für Theoretische ChemieUniversität Duisburg-EssenEssenGermany

Personalised recommendations