Advertisement

Journal of Computer-Aided Materials Design

, Volume 11, Issue 2–3, pp 201–210 | Cite as

Microstructures of chafer cuticle and biomimetic design

  • B Chen
  • J. FAN
Article

Abstract

Insect cuticle has high strength and high fracture-toughness. The superior material properties are closely related to the various particular microstructures in the cuticle, which has passed through natural optimization for thousands of years. In this work, a scanning electron microscope (SEM) was used for observing the various microstructures in a chafer cuticle. The observation revealed that there are several special microstructures that include helicoidal layups, round-hole-fiber arrangements and branched fibers in the cuticle. These microstructures were analyzed in order to learn more about the strength and toughness mechanisms of these microstructures. Several biomimetic composites were then designed and fabricated with special processes and moulds. Obtained biomimetic composites were tested for investigating their strength and toughness and then compared with those of conventional man-made composites. It was shown that the mechanical properties of the biomimetic composites are remarkably better than those of the corresponding conventional man-made composites.

Keywords

biomimetic design chafer cuticle fabrication microstructure verification 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Currey, J.D. 1977Proc. Roy. Soc. London B,196443Google Scholar
  2. Gunderson S.L., Narayan R., Schiavone R.C., 1990. Proc. Am. Soc. Comp., 165.Google Scholar
  3. Currey, J.D. 1983Handbook Comp.4503Google Scholar
  4. Gordon, J.E., Jeronimidis, G. 1980Phil. Trans. R. Soc. London A,294545Google Scholar
  5. Lawrence K.J., 1980. The Mechanical Property of Biological Material, Cambridge University Press, p. 137.Google Scholar
  6. Jackson, A.P., Vincent, J.F.V., Tumer, R.M. 1988Proc. R. Soc. London B,234415Google Scholar
  7. Clegg, W.J., Kendall, K., Alford, N.M. 1990Nature762217Google Scholar
  8. Hepburn, H.R., Ball, A. 1973J. Mater. Sci.,8618Google Scholar
  9. Hadley N.F. 1986. Scientific American, July p. 104.Google Scholar
  10. Schiavone R., Gunderson S., 1989. Proc. Am. Soc. Comp., p. 876.Google Scholar
  11. Bouligand, Y. 1965C. R. Acad. Sci., Paris2613665Google Scholar
  12. Nuismer, R.J., Whitney, J.M. 1975Fracture Mechanics of CompositesASTM STP.593117Google Scholar
  13. Gao, Q. 1986Engineering Fracture MechanicsChongqing University PressChongqing63Google Scholar
  14. Leung C.K., Ybanez N. (1997). J. Eng. Mech. 239Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Resources and Environmental ScienceChongqing UniversityChongqingPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.School of EngineeringAlfred UniversityAlfredUSA

Personalised recommendations