Abstract
This paper presents a model that demonstrates how pharmaceutical companies can make profits from human experimentation by working on patients’ expectations and physicians’ inability to evaluate innovations in medical knowledge. In order to understand how profits can be made, it is important to analyze the effect the physician’s expectations have on patients, both in the enrolment process and in the collected effectiveness, as well as the nature of the physician’s interest in producing this effect. Starting from the process through which companies collect clinical evidence, the analysis will focus on the economic use of that data on the drug market and the national drug agency’s role. A model illustrates the companies’ potential opportunistic strategies as well as what the public stakeholder’s target should be. Is public intervention really necessary in order to regulate the imperfect market of drugs? In other words, taking imperfection due to the expectation process in human experimentation into account, is there another practicable path? The final normative analysis will try to answer these questions.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Akerlof G. A. (1970) The market for “lemons”: Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 84(3): 488–500
Appelbaum P. S., Roth L. H., Lidz C. (1982) The therapeutic misconception: Informed consent in psychiatric research. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 5: 319–329
Ariely D. (2008) Predictably irrational, the hidden forces that shape our decisions (1st ed.). HarperCollins, New York
Arrow K. J. (1963) Uncertainty and the welfare economics of medical care. American Economic Review 53(5): 941–973
Blumenthal J. A. (2004) Law and emotions: The problem of affective forecasting. Indiana Law Journal 80: 155–238
Braddock C. H., Fihn S. D., Levinson W., Jonsen A. R., Pearlman R. A. (1997) How doctors and patients discuss routine clinical decisions: Informed decision making in the outpatient setting. Journal of General Internal Medicine 12(6): 339–345
Calabresi G. (1969) Reflection on medical experimentation in human. Daedalus 98(2): 387–405
Coleman C. H. (2004) Rationalizing risk assessment in human subject research. Arizona Law Review 46: 1–51
Daugherty C. K. (1999) Impact of therapeutic research on informed consent and the ethics of clinical trials: A medical oncology perspective. Journal of Clinical Oncology 17(5): 1601–1617
Declaration of Helsinki, Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. (2008, October). 59thWMA General Assembly, Seoul.
Emanuel E. J. (1995) A phase I trial on the ethics of phase I trials. Journal of Clinical Oncology 13(5): 1049–1051
Emanuel E. J., Wendler D., Grady C. (2000) What makes clinical research ethical?. Journal of the Medical Association 283(20): 2701–2711
Faden R. R., Beauchamp T. L., King N. M. P. (1986) A history and theory of informed consent. Oxford University Press, New York
Grady C. (2001) Money for research participation: Does it jeopardize informed consent?. American Journal of Bioethics 1(2): 40–44
Ippoliti, R. (2010). The market of human experimentation. European Journal of Law and Economics. doi:10.1007/s10657-010-9190-y.
Jolls C., Sunstein C. R., Thaler R. (1998) A behavioral approach to law and economics. Stanford Law Review 50(May): 1471–1550
Kahneman D., Tversky A. (1979) Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47(2): 263–291
Malani A. (2006) Identifying placebo effects with data from clinical trials. Journal of Political Economy 114(April): 236–256
Mas-Colell A., Whinston M. D., Green J. (1995) Microeconomic theory. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Miller M. (2000) Phase I cancer trials: A collusion of misunderstanding. Hastings Center Report 30(4): 34–42
Moses H. III, Dorsey E. R., Matheson D. H. M., Thier S. O. (2005) Financial anatomy of biomedical research. Journal of the American Medical Association 294(11): 1333–1342
Sankar P. (2004) Communication and miscommunication in informed consent to research. Medical Anthropology Quarterly 18(4): 429–446
Simon H. (1947) Administrative behavior: A study of decision-making processes in administrative organizations. The Macmillian Co, New York
Von Neumann J., Morgenstern O. (1944) Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ippoliti, R. Making profits working on patients’ expectations, a behavioral analysis of pharmaceutical clinical research. J Bioecon 14, 217–241 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10818-011-9121-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10818-011-9121-1
Keywords
- Pharmaceutical R&D
- Human experimentation
- Institutional Review Board
- Informed Consent
- Drug agency
- Medical researcher and research subject