Skip to main content
Log in

Making profits working on patients’ expectations, a behavioral analysis of pharmaceutical clinical research

  • Published:
Journal of Bioeconomics Aims and scope

Abstract

This paper presents a model that demonstrates how pharmaceutical companies can make profits from human experimentation by working on patients’ expectations and physicians’ inability to evaluate innovations in medical knowledge. In order to understand how profits can be made, it is important to analyze the effect the physician’s expectations have on patients, both in the enrolment process and in the collected effectiveness, as well as the nature of the physician’s interest in producing this effect. Starting from the process through which companies collect clinical evidence, the analysis will focus on the economic use of that data on the drug market and the national drug agency’s role. A model illustrates the companies’ potential opportunistic strategies as well as what the public stakeholder’s target should be. Is public intervention really necessary in order to regulate the imperfect market of drugs? In other words, taking imperfection due to the expectation process in human experimentation into account, is there another practicable path? The final normative analysis will try to answer these questions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akerlof G. A. (1970) The market for “lemons”: Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 84(3): 488–500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Appelbaum P. S., Roth L. H., Lidz C. (1982) The therapeutic misconception: Informed consent in psychiatric research. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 5: 319–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ariely D. (2008) Predictably irrational, the hidden forces that shape our decisions (1st ed.). HarperCollins, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow K. J. (1963) Uncertainty and the welfare economics of medical care. American Economic Review 53(5): 941–973

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumenthal J. A. (2004) Law and emotions: The problem of affective forecasting. Indiana Law Journal 80: 155–238

    Google Scholar 

  • Braddock C. H., Fihn S. D., Levinson W., Jonsen A. R., Pearlman R. A. (1997) How doctors and patients discuss routine clinical decisions: Informed decision making in the outpatient setting. Journal of General Internal Medicine 12(6): 339–345

    Google Scholar 

  • Calabresi G. (1969) Reflection on medical experimentation in human. Daedalus 98(2): 387–405

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman C. H. (2004) Rationalizing risk assessment in human subject research. Arizona Law Review 46: 1–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Daugherty C. K. (1999) Impact of therapeutic research on informed consent and the ethics of clinical trials: A medical oncology perspective. Journal of Clinical Oncology 17(5): 1601–1617

    Google Scholar 

  • Declaration of Helsinki, Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. (2008, October). 59thWMA General Assembly, Seoul.

  • Emanuel E. J. (1995) A phase I trial on the ethics of phase I trials. Journal of Clinical Oncology 13(5): 1049–1051

    Google Scholar 

  • Emanuel E. J., Wendler D., Grady C. (2000) What makes clinical research ethical?.   Journal of the Medical Association 283(20): 2701–2711

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faden R. R., Beauchamp T. L., King N. M. P. (1986) A history and theory of informed consent. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Grady C. (2001) Money for research participation: Does it jeopardize informed consent?.   American Journal of Bioethics 1(2): 40–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ippoliti, R. (2010). The market of human experimentation. European Journal of Law and Economics. doi:10.1007/s10657-010-9190-y.

  • Jolls C., Sunstein C. R., Thaler R. (1998) A behavioral approach to law and economics. Stanford Law Review 50(May): 1471–1550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman D., Tversky A. (1979) Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47(2): 263–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malani A. (2006) Identifying placebo effects with data from clinical trials. Journal of Political Economy 114(April): 236–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mas-Colell A., Whinston M. D., Green J. (1995) Microeconomic theory. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller M. (2000) Phase I cancer trials: A collusion of misunderstanding. Hastings Center Report 30(4): 34–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moses H. III, Dorsey E. R., Matheson D. H. M., Thier S. O. (2005) Financial anatomy of biomedical research. Journal of the American Medical Association 294(11): 1333–1342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sankar P. (2004) Communication and miscommunication in informed consent to research. Medical Anthropology Quarterly 18(4): 429–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon H. (1947) Administrative behavior: A study of decision-making processes in administrative organizations. The Macmillian Co, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Neumann J., Morgenstern O. (1944) Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roberto Ippoliti.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ippoliti, R. Making profits working on patients’ expectations, a behavioral analysis of pharmaceutical clinical research. J Bioecon 14, 217–241 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10818-011-9121-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10818-011-9121-1

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation