A Minimalist Approach to Archaeological Data Management Design
If archaeology is to deal with the “big questions” of the human past, large datasets are required with common data structures that allow for comparison of data derived from markedly different times and places. However, archaeological comparisons using datasets consisting of lots of detailed records remain elusive. Large archaeological datasets are difficult to integrate because it is often functional and therefore interpretative categories that are recorded rather than the phenomena upon which these interpretations are based. Here, we describe a system that maintains a structural separation between recording a simple set of archaeological phenomena, and the functional, behavioral meanings, and temporal associations of these phenomena. Rather than construct a schema that integrates the description of high-level units and relationships, we consider what minimum data entities that might be needed to integrate datasets in relation to archaeological phenomena while still offering the flexibility needed to allow for regional variability in unit construction. We describe the implementation of this system to field recording on Ahuahu (Great Mercury Island), New Zealand, and consider examples of comparative analyses of material recorded using this system from our projects in Australia and Egypt.
KeywordsData management Fieldwork recording Data ontology Big data
Work on Ahuahu/Great Mercury Island is supported by the Fay and Richwhite families, particularly Sir Michael Fay, the Auckland Museum, and the University of Auckland. We acknowledge the support of Ngāti Hei, who provide manawhenua cultural support, and Heritage New Zealand. Permission to work on the Fayum material was provided by the Egyptian Supreme Council of Antiquities and the Ministry of State for Antiquities. We are grateful to Aboriginal Traditional Owners of country in our western NSW study areas for their permission to conduct the research, and their assistance with fieldwork. Thanks to Shannon McPherron for comments on a draft of the paper.
The Egyptian work was supported by the Royal Society of New Zealand through a Marsden grant (UOA1106), by the National Geographic Society, and by the University of Auckland. The Australian research was funded by an Australian Research Council Discovery Project Grant (DP0557439), Macquarie, and University of Auckland research grants.
- Bailey, G. (2007) Time perspectives, palimpsests and the archaeology of time. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 26(2),198–223Google Scholar
- Berggren, Å., Dell’Unto, N., Forte, M., Haddow, S., Hodder, I., Issavi, J., Lercari, N., Mazzucato, C., Mickel, A., & Taylor, J. S. (2015). Revisiting reflexive archaeology at Çatalhöyük: integrating digital and 3D technologies at the trowel’s edge. Antiquity, 89(344), 433–448. https://doi.org/10.15184/aqy.2014.43.Google Scholar
- Brin, A. (2015). Data Dictionary. Retrieved from https://docs.tdar.org/display/TDAR/Data+Dictionary on 12/01/2016.
- Davies, B., & Holdaway, S. J. (2018). Windows on the past? Perspectives on accumulation, formation, and significance from an Australian Holocene lithic landscape. Mitteilungen der Gesellschaft für Urgeschichte, 26(2017), 13–40.Google Scholar
- Davies, B., Holdaway, S. J., & Fanning, P. C. (2018). Exploring relationships between space, movement, and lithic geometric attributes in the formation of archaeological landscapes. American Antiquity, 83(03), 444–461.Google Scholar
- Faniel, I., Kansa, E., Kansa, S. W., Barrera-Gomez, J., & Yakel, E. (2013). The challenges of digging data: a study of context in archaeological data Reuse. In JCDL 2013 Proceedings of the 13th ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on digital libraries (pp. 295–304). New York: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2467696.2467712.Google Scholar
- Felicett, A., Meghini, C., Papatheodorou, C., & Richards J. (2016). ARIADNE D3.4 Final report on standards and project impact. http://www.ariadne-infrastructure.eu/Resources/D3.4-Final-Report-on-Standards-and-Project-Registry
- Furey, L., Phillipps, R. S., Jorgensen, A., Holdaway, S., & Ladefoged, T. (2013). Investigations on Ahuahu Great Mercury Island 2012. Archaeology in New Zealand, 56(3), 156–163.Google Scholar
- Furey, L., Emmitt, J. J., Phillipps, R. S., Ladefoged, T., Jorgensen, A., & Holdaway, S. (2017). Brief interim report for excavations on Ahuahu Great Mercury Island, June 2014 to February 2017. Archaeology in New Zealand, 60(3), 45–63.Google Scholar
- Gardin, J. C. (1980). Archaeological constructs: an aspect of theoretical archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Gordon, J. M., Averett, E. W., & Counts, D. B. (2016). Mobile computing in archaeology: exploring and interpreting current practices. In E. W. Averett, J. M. Gordon, & D. B. Counts (Eds.), The Potential of Digital Archaeology (pp. 1–30). Grand Forks: The Digital Press, The Univerisyt of North Dakota.Google Scholar
- Holdaway, S. J., & Fanning, P. (2014). Geoarchaeology of Aboriginal Landscapes in Semi-arid Australia. Collingwood: CSIRO.Google Scholar
- Holdaway, S. J., & Wendrich, W. (2017). The desert Fayum reinvestigated: the early to mid-Holocene landscape archaeology of the Fayum north shore, Egypt. Monumenta Archaeologica (Vol. 39). Los Angeles: Cotsen Institute of Archaeology Press.Google Scholar
- Holdaway, S.J. Davies, B., & Fanning P.C. (2017) Aboriginal use of fire in a landscape context: investigating presence and absence of heat retainer hearths in Western New South Wales, Australia. Current Anthropology 58, Supplement 16, S230–S242. https://doi.org/10.1086/691436
- Janowicz, K., Scheider, S., Pehle, T., & Hart, G. (2012). Geospatial semantics and linked spatiotemporal data -past, present, and future. Semantic Web, 3(4), 321–332.Google Scholar
- Jeffrey, S., Richards, J., Ciravegna, F., Waller, S., Chapman, S., & Zhang, Z. (2009). The Archaeotools project: faceted classification and natural language processing in an archaeological context. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 367(1897), 2507–2519. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2009.0038.Google Scholar
- Kintigh, K. W., Altschul, J. H., Beaudry, M. C., Drennan, R. D., Kinzig, A. P., Kohler, T. A., Limp, W. F., Maschner, H. D. G., Michener, W. K., Pauketat, T. R., Peregrine, P., Sabloff, J. A., Wilkinson, T. J., Wright, H. T., & Zeder, M. A. (2014). Grand challenges for archaeology. American Antiquity, 79(1), 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1324000111.Google Scholar
- Kintigh, K. W., Altschul, J. H., Kinzig, A. P., Limp, W. F., Michener, W. K., Sabloff, J. A., Hackett, E. J., Kohler, T. A., Ludäscher, B., & Lynch, C. A. (2015). Cultural dynamics, deep time, and data: planning cyberinfrastructure investments for archaeology. Advances in Archaeological Practice, 3(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.7183/2326-37126.96.36.199.Google Scholar
- Lucas, G. (2012). Understanding the archaeological record. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Marchetti, N., Ivana, A., Gilberto, A., Giacomo, B., Gabriele, B., Antonio, C., Gustavo, M., & Marco, R. (2017). NEARCHOS. Networked archaeological open science: advances in archaeology through field analytics and scientific community sharing. Journal of Archaeological Research, 26(4), 447–469. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10814-017-9112-4.Google Scholar
- McIvor, I. H., & Ladefoged, T. (2016). A multi-scalar analysis of Māori land use on Ahuahu (Great Mercury Island), New Zealand. Archaeology in Oceania, 51(1), 45–61.Google Scholar
- McPherron, S. P. (2009) E4. http://www.oldstoneage.com/software/e4.shtml
- McPherron, S. P., & Dibble, H. L. (2002). Using computers in archaeology: a practical guide. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
- Museum of London & Museum of London Archaeology Service. (1994). Archaeological site manual (3rd ed.). London: Museum of London.Google Scholar
- Oikarinen, T., & Kortelainen, T. (2013). Challenges of diversity, consistency, and globality in indexing of local archeological artifacts. Knowledge Organization, 40(2), 123–135.Google Scholar
- Phillipps, R. S. (2012). Documenting socio-economic variability in the Egyptian Neolithic through stone artefact analysis. unpublished PhD thesis, Department of anthropology, University of Auckland.Google Scholar
- Phillipps, R. S., Jorgensen, A., Furey, L., Holdaway, S., Ladefoged, T., & Wallace, R. (2014). Interim report on archaeological investigations Ahuahu Great Mercury Island, November 2012-February 2014. Archaeology in New Zealand, 57(4), 215–228.Google Scholar
- Phillipps, R. S., Holdaway, S. J., Ramsay, R., Emmitt, J. J., Wendrich, W., & Linseele, V. (2016). Lake level changes, lake edge basins and the paleoenvironment of the Fayum north shore, Egypt, during the early to mid-Holocene. Open Quaternary, 2(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.5334/oq.19.Google Scholar
- Richards, J. D. (2006). Archaeology, E-publication and the semantic web. Antiquity, 80(310), 970–979.Google Scholar
- Richards, J. D. (2009). From anarchy to good practice: the evolution of standards in archaeological computing. Archeologia e Calcolatori., 20, 27–35.Google Scholar
- Roosevelt, C. H., Cobb, P., Moss, E., Olson, B. R., & Unlüsoy, S. (2015). Excavation is destruction digitization: advances in archaeological practice. Journal of Field Archaeology, 40(3), 325–346. https://doi.org/10.1179/2042458215Y.0000000004.
- Snow, D. R. (2010). Making legacy literature and data accessible in archaeology. In B. Frischer, J. Webb Crawford, & D. Koller (Eds.), Making history interactive. Computer applications and quantitative methods in archaeology (CAA), Proceedings of the 37th International Conference, Williamsburg, Virginia, United States of America, March 22–26 (BAR international series S2079) (pp. 350–355). Oxford: Archaeopress.Google Scholar
- Spielmann, K. A. & Kintigh, K. W. (2011). The digital archaeological record: the potentials of the Archaeozoological data integration through TDAR. The SAA Archaeological Record, 11(1), 22–25.Google Scholar
- Stead, S. (2008) The CIDOC CRM, a standard for the integration of cultural information. http://old.cidoc-crm.org/cidoc_tutorial/index.html
- Stein, J. K., & Farrand, W. R. (2001). Sediments in archaeological context. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.Google Scholar
- Wesson, C. B., & Cottier, J. W. (2014). Big sites, big questions, big data, big problems: scales of investigation and changing perceptions of archaeological practice in the southeastern United States. Bulletin of the History of Archaeology., 24(16), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.5334/bha.2416.Google Scholar