Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory

, Volume 18, Issue 4, pp 278–283 | Cite as

The Contribution of Behavioral Archaeology and the Research of Michael B. Schiffer to the Discipline

  • Stephen Plog


I evaluate the impact of Behavioral Archaeology within the discipline, focusing particularly on the contributions of Mike Schiffer who originally proposed the approach and has continued to be the primary advocate. I suggest that Behavioral Archaeology has made several key contributions over the last four decades. However, to answer most of the broad range of questions of interest to the discipline, a variety of complementary methodological and theoretical approaches must be employed.


Behavioral Archaeology Michael B. Schiffer History of archaeology 


  1. Deetz, J., & Dethlefsen, E. S. (1967). Death’s head, cherub, urn and willow. Natural History, 76, 28–37.Google Scholar
  2. Hanks, J. R., & Kroeber, A. L. (1940). Three centuries of women’s dress fashions: a quantitative analysis. Anthropological Records, 5, 11–153.Google Scholar
  3. Heitman, C., & Plog, S. (1995). Kinship and the dynamics of the house. In V. Scarborough (Ed.), A Catalyst for ideas: anthropological archaeology and the legacy of Douglas W. Schwartz. Santa Fe: School of American Research Press.Google Scholar
  4. McGuire, R. H., & Schiffer, M. B. (1982). Hohokam and Patayan. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  5. Plog, S. (1977). Review of “Behavioral archeology.” American Anthropologist, 79, 492–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Plog, S., & Heitman, C. (2010). Hierarchy and social inequality in the American Southwest, a.d. 800–1200. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 107, 19619–19626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Schiffer, M. B. (1972). Archaeological context and systemic context. American Antiquity, 37, 156–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Schiffer, M. B. (1976). Behavioral archeology. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  9. Schiffer, M. B. (1981). Some issues in the philosophy of archaeology. American Antiquity, 46, 899–908.Google Scholar
  10. Schiffer, M. B. (1986). Radiocarbon dating and the “old wood” problem: the case of Hohokam chronology. Journal of Archaeological Science, 13, 13–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Schiffer, M. B. (1988). The structure of archaeological theory. American Antiquity, 53, 461–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Schiffer, M. B. (1989). Formation processes of Broken K Pueblo: some hypotheses. In R. D. Leonard & G. T. Jones (Eds.), Quantifying diversity in archaeology (pp. 37–58). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Schiffer, M. B. (1990). The influence of surface treatment on heating effectiveness of ceramic vessels. Journal of Archaeological Science, 17, 373–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Schiffer, M. B. (1991). The portable radio in American life. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
  15. Schiffer, M. B. (1994). Taking charge: the electric automobile in America. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Books.Google Scholar
  16. Schiffer, M. B. (1995). Social theory and history in behavioral archaeology. In J. M. Skibo, W. H. Walker, & A. E. Nielsen (Eds.), Expanding archaeology (pp. 22–35). Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.Google Scholar
  17. Schiffer, M. B. (1999). Behavioral archaeology: some clarifications. American Antiquity, 64, 166–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Schiffer, M. B. (2003). Draw the lightning down: Benjamin Franklin and electrical technology in the age of enlightenment. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  19. Schiffer, M. B., & Gumerman, G. J. (Eds.). (1977). Conservation Archaeology. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  20. Skibo, J. M., & Schiffer, M. B. (1987). The effects of water on processes of ceramic abrasion. Journal of Archaeological Science, 14, 83–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of AnthropologyUniversity of VirginiaCharlottesvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations