Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Consult and procedure incidence outcomes following establishment of a fertility preservation program for children with cancer

  • Fertility Preservation
  • Published:
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 02 February 2021

This article has been updated

Abstract

Purpose

Fertility is a quality of life outcome adversely affected by cancer therapy. Many childhood cancer patients, however, are not offered options to preserve their fertility. Providers acknowledge difficulty discussing impaired fertility to patients due to lack of knowledge of available options. Our objective was to review the impact of a pediatric multidisciplinary fertility preservation program on providers’ fertility preservation counseling and discussion of options.

Methods

A retrospective medical chart review was conducted for pediatric cancer patients prior to and following program establishment. Fertility preservation discussions, consults, and incidence were noted. Following filtering and stratification, 198 and 237 patients were seen prior to and following program establishment, respectively.

Results

Following program establishment, provider–patient discussions of impaired fertility (p = 0.007), fertility preservation consults (p = 0.01), and incidence of fertility preservation procedures (p < 0.001) increased among patients. Furthermore, the number of patients who received fertility preservation consults after receiving gonadotoxic treatment decreased (p < 0.001). This trend was particularly noted in pre-pubertal and female patients, for whom fertility preservation options are limited without an established program.

Conclusion

The establishment of a formal program greatly improved access to fertility preservation consults and procedures in children with cancer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available upon reasonable request from the corresponding author (AC). The data are not publicly available due to them containing information that could compromise research participant privacy/consent.

Change history

References

  1. Howlader NNA, Krapcho M, Miller D, Brest A, Yu M, Ruhl J, et al. SEER cancer statistics review, 1975-2016. Bethesda: National Cancer Institute; 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hudson MM, Mertens AC, Yasui Y, Hobbie W, Chen H, Gurney JG, et al. Health status of adult long-term survivors of childhood cancer: a report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. JAMA. 2003;290(12):1583–92. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.290.12.1583.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Robison LL, Hudson MM. Survivors of childhood and adolescent cancer: life-long risks and responsibilities. Nat Rev Cancer. 2014;14(1):61–70. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc3634.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Vakalopoulos I, Dimou P, Anagnostou I, Zeginiadou T. Impact of cancer and cancer treatment on male fertility. Hormones (Athens). 2015;14(4):579–89. https://doi.org/10.14310/horm.2002.1620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lawrenz B, Mahajan N, Fatemi HM. The effects of cancer therapy on women’s fertility: what do we know now? Future Oncol. 2016;12(14):1721–9. https://doi.org/10.2217/fon-2015-0004.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Electronic address aao. Fertility preservation in patients undergoing gonadotoxic therapy or gonadectomy: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2019;112(6):1022–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.09.013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Oktay K, Harvey BE, Partridge AH, Quinn GP, Reinecke J, Taylor HS, et al. Fertility preservation in patients with cancer: ASCO clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36(19):1994–2001. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2018.78.1914.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Klipstein S, Fallat ME, Savelli S, Committee On B, Section On HO, Section OS. Fertility preservation for pediatric and adolescent patients with cancer: medical and ethical considerations. Pediatrics. 2020;145(3). https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2019-3994.

  9. van den Berg H, Langeveld NE. Parental knowledge of fertility in male childhood cancer survivors. Psychooncology. 2008;17(3):287–91. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.1248.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hohmann C, Borgmann-Staudt A, Rendtorff R, Reinmuth S, Holzhausen S, Willich SN, et al. Patient counselling on the risk of infertility and its impact on childhood cancer survivors: results from a national survey. J Psychosoc Oncol. 2011;29(3):274–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/07347332.2011.563344.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Shnorhavorian M, Harlan LC, Smith AW, Keegan TH, Lynch CF, Prasad PK, et al. Fertility preservation knowledge, counseling, and actions among adolescent and young adult patients with cancer: a population-based study. Cancer. 2015;121(19):3499–506. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.29328.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Schover LR, Brey K, Lichtin A, Lipshultz LI, Jeha S. Oncologists’ attitudes and practices regarding banking sperm before cancer treatment. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20(7):1890–7. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2002.07.174.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kohler TS, Kondapalli LA, Shah A, Chan S, Woodruff TK, Brannigan RE. Results from the survey for preservation of adolescent reproduction (SPARE) study: gender disparity in delivery of fertility preservation message to adolescents with cancer. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2011;28(3):269–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-010-9504-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Panagiotopoulou N, van Delft FW, Hale JP, Stewart JA. Fertility preservation care for children and adolescents with cancer: an inquiry to quantify professionals’ barriers. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol. 2017;6(3):422–8. https://doi.org/10.1089/jayao.2016.0087.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Panagiotopoulou N, Ghuman N, Sandher R, Herbert M, Stewart JA. Barriers and facilitators towards fertility preservation care for cancer patients: a meta-synthesis. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2018;27(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/ecc.12428.

  16. Garvelink MM, ter Kuile MM, Bakker RM, Geense WJ, Jenninga E, Louwe LA, et al. Women’s experiences with information provision and deciding about fertility preservation in the Netherlands: ‘satisfaction in general, but unmet needs’. Health Expect. 2015;18(5):956–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.12068.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Carlson CA, Kolon TF, Mattei P, Hobbie W, Gracia CR, Ogle S, et al. Developing a hospital-wide fertility preservation service for pediatric and young adult patients. J Adolesc Health. 2017;61(5):571–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2017.07.008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ben-Aharon I, Abir R, Perl G, Stein J, Gilad G, Toledano H, et al. Optimizing the process of fertility preservation in pediatric female cancer patients-a multidisciplinary program. BMC Cancer. 2016;16:620. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-016-2584-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Lewin J, Ma JMZ, Mitchell L, Tam S, Puri N, Stephens D, et al. The positive effect of a dedicated adolescent and young adult fertility program on the rates of documentation of therapy-associated infertility risk and fertility preservation options. Support Care Cancer. 2017;25(6):1915–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-017-3597-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kelvin JF, Thom B, Benedict C, Carter J, Corcoran S, Dickler MN, et al. Cancer and fertility program improves patient satisfaction with information received. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(15):1780–6. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2015.64.5168.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Javed A, Khan Z, Pittock ST, Jensen JR. Options for fertility preservation in children. Pediatr Endocrinol Rev. 2018;15(3):223–33. https://doi.org/10.17458/per.vol15.2018.jkpj.fertilitypreservation.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ben-Aharon I, Ash S, Ben-Haroush A, Perl G, Oron G, Pinkas H, et al. Fertility preservation in young cancer patients-can we optimize the path? Harefuah. 2017;156(5):326–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Vu JV, Llarena NC, Estevez SL, Moravek MB, Jeruss JS. Oncofertility program implementation increases access to fertility preservation options and assisted reproductive procedures for breast cancer patients. J Surg Oncol. 2017;115(2):116–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.24418.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Jurewicz M, Hillelsohn J, Mehta S, Gilbert BR. Fertility preservation in pubertal and pre-pubertal boys with cancer. Pediatr Endocrinol Rev. 2018;15(3):234–43. https://doi.org/10.17458/per.vol15.2018.jhmg.fertilitypubertalboys.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Wallace WH, Kelsey TW, Anderson RA. Fertility preservation in pre-pubertal girls with cancer: the role of ovarian tissue cryopreservation. Fertil Steril. 2016;105(1):6–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.11.041.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Nieman CL, Kinahan KE, Yount SE, Rosenbloom SK, Yost KJ, Hahn EA, et al. Fertility preservation and adolescent cancer patients: lessons from adult survivors of childhood cancer and their parents. Cancer Treat Res. 2007;138:201–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-72293-1_15.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Christianson MS, Lindheim SR. Pediatric ovarian tissue cryopreservation: time to lift the experimental label? Fertil Steril. 2018;109(5):805–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.03.035.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Forman EJ. Ovarian tissue cryopreservation: still experimental? Fertil Steril. 2018;109(3):443–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.12.031.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Takeuchi E, Kato M, Miyata K, Suzuki N, Shimizu C, Okada H, et al. The effects of an educational program for non-physician health care providers regarding fertility preservation. Support Care Cancer. 2018;26(10):3447–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-018-4217-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Vakeesan B, Weidman DR, Maloney AM, Allen L, Lorenzo AJ, Gupta AA. Fertility preservation in pediatric subspecialties: a pilot needs assessment beyond oncology. J Pediatr. 2018;194:253–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2017.10.072.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank all members of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Pediatric Endocrinology, Pediatric Surgery, Urology, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pediatrics, and the In Vitro Fertilization lab at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, for their ongoing support in the success of this project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

SB, VBJ, RSH, and AC designed the study. SB and VBJ performed data abstraction. All authors discussed the results and contributed to the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Asma J. Chattha.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethics approval

This research study was conducted retrospectively from data obtained for clinical purposes. We consulted extensively with the Mayo Clinic Institutional Review Board who determined that our study did not need ethical approval. An IRB official waiver of ethical approval was granted from the Mayo Clinic Institutional Review Board (Study # 19-006156). Methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.

Consent to participate

All patients included in this study have authorized their records to be used for research through the Minnesota Research Authorization.

Consent for publication

All patients included in this study have authorized their records to be used for research through the Minnesota Research Authorization.

Code availability

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The original online version of this article was revised: the other affiliation of Reda S. Hussein, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt, should be included in the article.

Supriya Behl and Vidhu B. Joshi equally contributed to this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Behl, S., Joshi, V.B., Hussein, R.S. et al. Consult and procedure incidence outcomes following establishment of a fertility preservation program for children with cancer. J Assist Reprod Genet 38, 495–501 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-020-02042-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-020-02042-8

Keywords

Navigation