Abstract
Purpose
How can elective egg freezing (EEF) be made patient centered? This study asked women to reflect on their experiences of EEF, which included their insights and recommendations on the optimal delivery of patient-centered care.
Methods
In this binational, qualitative study, 150 women (114 in the USA, 36 in Israel) who had completed at least one cycle of EEF were recruited from four American IVF clinics (two academic, two private) and three in Israel (one academic, two private) over a two-year period (June 2014–August 2016). Women who volunteered for the study were interviewed by two medical anthropologists. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed, and entered into a qualitative data management program (Dedoose) for analysis.
Results
The majority (85%) of women were without partners at the time of EEF, and thus were undertaking EEF alone in mostly couples-oriented IVF clinics. Following the conceptual framework known as “patient-centered infertility care,” we identified two broad categories and eleven specific dimensions of patient-centered EEF care, including (1) system factors: information, competence of clinic and staff, coordination and integration, accessibility, physical comfort, continuity and transition, and cost and (2) human factors: attitude and relationship with staff, communication, patient involvement and privacy, and emotional support. Cost was a unique factor of importance in both countries, despite their different healthcare delivery systems.
Conclusions
Single women who are pursuing EEF alone in the mostly couples-oriented world of IVF have distinct and multifaceted needs. IVF clinics should strive to make best practices for patient-centered EEF care a high priority.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Inhorn MC, Birenbaum-Carmeli D, Westphal LM, Doyle J, Gleicher N, Meirow D, et al. Ten pathways to elective egg freezing: a binational analysis. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2018;35:2003–11.
Inhorn MC, Birenbaum-Carmeli D, Westphal LM, Doyle J, Gleicher N, Meirow D, et al. Elective egg freezing and its underlying socio-demography: a binational analysis with global implications. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2018;16:70.
Allahbadia GN. Social egg freezing: developing countries are not exempt. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2016;66:213–7.
Santo EVE, Dieamant F, Petersen CG, Mauri AL, Vagnini LD, Renzi A, et al. Social oocyte cryopreservation: a portrayal of Brazilian women. JBRA Assist Reprod. 2017;21:101–4.
Hammarberg K. Fertility preservation in women for social reasons. Encyclopedia Reprod. 2018;5:259–62.
Lewis EI, Missmer SA, Farland LV, Ginsburg ES. Public support in the United States for elective oocyte cryopreservation. Fertil Steril. 2016;106:1182–9.
Lallemant C, Vassard D, Andersen AN, Schmidt L, Macklon N. Medical and social egg freezing: internet-based survey of knowledge and attitudes among women in Denmark and the UK. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2016;95:1402–10.
Milman LW, Senapati S, Sammel MD, Cameron KD, Gracia C. Assessing reproductive choices of women and the likelihood of oocyte cryopreservation in the era of elective oocyte freezing. Fertil Steril. 2017;107:1214–22.
Cobo A, Garcia-Velasco JA. Why all women should freeze their eggs. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2016;28:206–10.
Donnez J, Dolmans M-M. Fertility preservation in women. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:1657–65.
Gunnala V, Schattman G. Oocyte vitrification for elective fertility preservation: the past, present, and future. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2017;29:59–63.
Goldman KN, Grifo JA. Elective oocyte cryopreservation for deferred childbearing. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2016;23:458–64.
Hodes-Wertz B, Druckenmiller S, Smith M, Noyes N. What to reproductive-age women who undergo oocyte cryopreservation think about the process as a means to preserve fertility? Fertil Steril. 2014;100:1343–9.
Stoop D, Maes E, Polyzos NP, Verheyen G, Tournaye H, Nekkebroeck J. Does oocyte banking for anticipated gamete exhaustion influence future relational and reproductive choices? A follow-up of bankers and non-bankers. Hum Reprod. 2015;30:338–44.
Hammarberg K, Kirkman M, Pritchard N, Hickey M, Peate M, McBain J, et al. Reproductive experiences of women who cryopreserved oocytes for non-medical reasons. Hum Reprod. 2017;32:575–81.
Pritchard N, Kirkman M, Hammarberg K, McBain J, Agresta F, Bayly C, et al. Characteristics and circumstances of women in Australia who cryopreserved their oocytes for non-medical indications. J Reprod Infant Psychol. 2017;35:108–18.
Gurtin ZB, Shah T, Wang J, Ahuja K. Reconceiving egg freezing: insights from an analysis of 5 years of data from a UK clinic. Reprod BioMed Online. 2019;38:272–82.
Greenwood EA, Pasch LA, Hastie J, Cedars MI, Huddleston HG. To freeze or not to freeze: decision regret and satisfaction following elective oocyte cryopreservation. Fertil Steril. 2018;109:1097–104.
Brown E, Patrick M. Time, anticipation, and the life course: egg freezing as temporarily disentangling romance and reproduction. Am Sociol Rev. 2018:1–24.
Baldwin K, Culley L, Hudson N, Mitchell H, Lavery S. Oocyte cryopreservation for social reasons: demographic profile and disposal intentions of UK users. Reprod BioMed Online. 2015;31:239–45.
Baldwin K. “I suppose I think to myself, that’s the best way to be a mother”: how ideologies of parenthood shape women’s use for social egg freezing technology. Sociol Res Online. 2017;22:2–15.
Baldwin K. Conceptualising women’s motivations for social egg freezing and experience of reproductive delay. Sociol Health Illn. 2018;40:859–73.
Baldwin K, Culley LA, Hudson N, Mitchell HL. Running out of time: exploring women’s motivations for social egg freezing. J Psychosom Obstet Gynecol. 2018:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/0167482X.2018.1460352.
Kilic A, Gocmen I. Fate, morals and rational calculations: freezing eggs for non-medical reasons in Turkey. Soc Sci Med. 2018;203:19–27.
Gocmen I, Kilic A. Egg freezing experiences of women in Turkey: from the social context to the narratives of reproductive ageing and empowerment. Eur J Wom Stud. 2018;25:168–82.
Institute of Medicine. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine; 2001.
Van Empel IWH, Dancet EAF, Koolman XHE, Nelen WLDM, Stolk EA, Sermeus W, et al. Physicians underestimate the importance of patient-centeredness to patients: a discrete choice experiment in fertility care. Hum Reprod. 2011;26:584–93.
Dancet EAF, D’Hooghe TM, Sermeus W, Van Empel I, Strohmer H, Wyns C, et al. Patients from across Europe have similar views on patient-centered care: an international multilingual qualitative study in infertility care. Hum Reprod. 2012;27:1702–11.
Dancet EAF, Van Empel IWH, Rober P, Nelen WLDM, Kremer JAM, D’Hooghe TM. Patient-centered infertility care: a qualitative study to listen to the patient’s voice. Hum Reprod. 2011;26:827–33.
Aarts JWM, Huppelschoten AG, van Empel IWH, Boivin J, Verhaak CM, Kremer JAM, et al. How patient-centered care relates to patients’ quality of life and distress in a study in 427 women experiencing infertility. Hum Reprod. 2012;27:488–95.
Huppelschoten AG, Aarts JWM, van Empel IWH, Cohlen BJ, Kremer JAM, Nelen WLDM. Feedback to professionals on patient-centered fertility care is insufficient for improvement: a mixed-method study. Fertil Steril. 2013;99:1419–27.
Mourad SM, Nelen WLDM, Akkermans RP, Vollebergh JHA, Grol RPTM, Hermens RPMG, et al. Determinants of patients’ experiences and satisfaction with fertility care. Fertil Steril. 2010;94:1254–60.
Van Empel IWH, Aarts JNM, Cohlen BJ, Huppelschoten DA, Laven JSE, Nelen WLDM, et al. Measuring patient-centeredness, the neglected outcome in fertility care: a random multicenter validation study. Hum Reprod. 2010;25:2516–26.
Van Empel IWH, Hermens RPMG, Akkermans RP, Hollander KWP, Nelen WLDM, Kremer JAM. Organizational determinants of patient-centered fertility care: a multilevel analysis. Fertil Steril. 2011;95:513–9.
Inhorn MC, Birenbaum-Carmeli C, Westphal LM, Doyle J, Gleicher N, Meirow D, et al. Medical egg freezing: the importance of a patient-centered approach to fertility preservation. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2018;35:49–59.
Hollan D. The psychology of person-centered ethnography. In: Moore CC, Mathews HF, editors. The psychology of cultural experience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2001. p. 48–67.
Hertz R. Single by chance, mothers by choice: how women are choosing parenthood without marriage and creating the new American family. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008.
Mamo L. Queering reproduction: achieving pregnancy in the age of technoscience. Durham: Duke University Press; 2007.
Almeling R. Sex cells: the medical market for eggs and sperm. Berkeley: University of California Press; 2011.
Inhorn MC. Cosmopolitan conceptions: IVF sojourns in global Dubai. Durham: Duke University Press; 2015.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Jennifer DeChello, Jeannine Estrada, Sandee Murray, Tasha Newsome, Mira Vale, and Ruoxi Yu for various forms of editorial, research, study recruitment, and transcription assistance.
Funding
This study was funded by a grant from the US National Science Foundation, BCS-1356136, to PI Marcia C. Inhorn and Co-PI Pasquale Patrizio.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committees and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Inhorn, M.C., Birenbaum-Carmeli, D., Westphal, L.M. et al. Patient-centered elective egg freezing: a binational qualitative study of best practices for women’s quality of care. J Assist Reprod Genet 36, 1081–1090 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-019-01481-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-019-01481-2