Skip to main content
Log in

Magnetic-activated cell sorting of non-apoptotic spermatozoa improves the quality of embryos according to female age: a prospective sibling oocyte study

  • Assisted Reproduction Technologies
  • Published:
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The main aim of our study was to evaluate the benefit of the use of non-apoptotic spermatozoa selected by magnetic-activated cell sorting (MACS) for ICSI procedures for couples in which the women had good prognoses and the male factor of infertility was teratozoospermia.

Methods

Twenty-six couples were treated with ICSI after MACS selection of non-apoptotic spermatozoa following a sibling oocyte approach. Half of the oocytes were microinjected with conventionally prepared spermatozoa, and the other half were microinjected with non-apoptotic, MACS-selected spermatozoa. To assess the influence of MACS selection of spermatozoa on the outcomes of the ICSI cycles, the fertilization, embryo quality, pregnancy, and delivery rates were evaluated and compared between the sibling oocyte groups.

Results

When subpopulations of couples according to female age were analyzed, a significant difference in quality of blastocyst was observed. More precisely, in a group that was treated with MACS-ICSI, a higher percentage of good quality blastocysts was found among women older than 30 years (75.0 vs. 33.3%; P = 0.028), while there was no difference among younger women. If all included couples were compared regardless of age, no significant difference was observed in the outcome of the ICSI/MACS-ICSI cycles in terms of oocytes and embryos. Additionally, after the ICSI and MACS-ICSI procedures, the morphologies of the prepared spermatozoa were compared. Results showed that the overall percentage of morphologically normal spermatozoa did not differ significantly between the ICSI and MACS-ICSI procedures. However, detailed analyses of the morphologically abnormal spermatozoa revealed significantly more spermatozoa with abnormal tails after MACS-ICSI procedure, which may be potential consequence of the selection procedure. Moreover, the trends towards less spermatozoa with abnormal heads and towards more spermatozoa with abnormal necks and midpieces after MACS-ICSI procedure were revealed, although the differences were not significant.

Conclusions

Couples dealing with male infertility due to teratozoospermia can benefit from MACS selection of spermatozoa with higher percentage of good quality blastocysts but only when the woman is older than 30 years.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. World Health Organization. WHO Laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen. 5th ed. Geneva: WHO Press; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bartoov B, Berkovitz A, Eltes F, Kogosowski A, Menezo Y, Barak Y. Real-time fine morphology of motile human sperm cells is associated with IVF-ICSI outcome. J Androl. 2002;23:1–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Knez K, Zorn B, Tomazevic T, Vrtacnik-Bokal E, Virant-Klun I. The IMSI procedure improves poor embryo development in the same infertile couples with poor semen quality: a comparative prospective randomized study. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2011;9:123.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Knez K, Tomazevic T, Zorn B, Vrtacnik-Bokal E, Virant-Klun I. Intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection improves development and quality of preimplantation embryos in teratozoospermia patients. Reprod BioMed Online. 2012;25:168–79.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Knez K, Tomazevic T, Vrtacnik-Bokal E, Virant-Klun I. Developmental dynamics of IMSI-derived embryos: a time-lapse prospective study. Reprod BioMed Online. 2013;27:161–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Shalom-Paz E, Anabusi S, Michaeli M, Karchovsky-Shoshan E, Rothfarb N, Shavit T, et al. Can intra cytoplasmatic morphologically selected sperm injection (IMSI) technique improve outcome in patients with repeated IVF-ICSI failure? a comparative study. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2015;31:247–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Setti AS, Braga DP, Figueira RC, Iaconelli A Jr, Borges E. Intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection results in improved clinical outcomes in couples with previous ICSI failures or male factor infertility: a meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014;183:96–103.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gatimel N, Parinaud J, Leandri RD. Intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection (IMSI) does not improve outcome in patients with two successive IVF-ICSI failures. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2016;33:349–55.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Fortunato A, Boni R, Leo R, Nacchia G, Liguori F, Casale S, et al. Vacuoles in sperm head are not associated with head morphology, DNA damage and reproductive success. Reprod BioMed Online. 2016;32:154–61.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Teixeira DM, Barbosa MA, Ferriani RA, Navarro PA, Raine-Fenning N, Nastri CO, et al. Regular (ICSI) versus ultra-high magnification (IMSI) sperm selection for assisted reproduction. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;7:CD010167.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Maettner R, Sterzik K, Isachenko V, Strehler E, Rahimi G, Alabart JL, et al. Quality of human spermatozoa: relationship between high-magnification sperm morphology and DNA integrity. Andrologia. 2014;46:547–55.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hammoud I, Boitrelle F, Ferfouri F, Vialard F, Bergere M, Wainer B, et al. Selection of normal spermatozoa with a vacuole-free head (x6300) improves selection of spermatozoa with intact DNA in patients with high sperm DNA fragmentation rates. Andrologia. 2013;45:163–70.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Wilding M, Coppola G, di Matteo L, Palagiano A, Fusco E, Dale B. Intracytoplasmic injection of morphologically selected spermatozoa (IMSI) improves outcome after assisted reproduction by deselecting physiologically poor quality spermatozoa. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2011;28:253–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Garolla A, Sartini B, Cosci I, Pizzol D, Ghezzi M, Bertoldo A, et al. Molecular karyotyping of single sperm with nuclear vacuoles identifies more chromosomal abnormalities in patients with testiculopathy than fertile controls: implications for ICSI. Hum Reprod. 2015;30:2493–500.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lavolpe M, Lorenzi D, Greco E, Nodar F, Alvarez SC. Relationship between sperm DNA fragmentation and nuclear vacuoles. JBRA Assist Reprod. 2015;19:70–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Oosterhuis GJ, Mulder AB, Kalsbeek-Batenburg E, Lambalk CB, Schoemaker J, Vermes I. Measuring apoptosis in human spermatozoa: a biological assay for semen quality? Fertil Steril. 2000;74:245–50.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Vermes I, Haanen C, Steffens-Nakken H, Reutelingsperger C. A novel assay for apoptosis. Flow cytometric detection of phosphatidylserine expression on early apoptotic cells using fluorescein labelled Annexin V. J Immunol Methods. 1995;184:39–51.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Grunewald S, Paasch U. Sperm selection for ICSI using annexin V. Methods Mol Biol. 2013;927:257–62.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Rawe VY, Boudri HU, Alvarez Sedó C, Carro M, Papier S, Nodar F. Healthy baby born after reduction of sperm DNA fragmentation using cell sorting before ICSI. Reprod BioMed Online. 2010;20:320–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bucar S, Gonçalves A, Rocha E, Barros A, Sousa M. Sá R. DNA fragmentation in human sperm after magnetic-activated cell sorting. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2015;32:147–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Grunewald S, Baumann T, Paasch U, Glander HJ. Capacitation and acrosome reaction in nonapoptotic human spermatozoa. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2006;1090:138–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. de Vantéry Arrighi C, Lucas H, Chardonnens D, de Agostini A. Removal of spermatozoa with externalized phosphatidylserine from sperm preparation in human assisted medical procreation: effects on viability, motility and mitochondrial membrane potential. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2009;7:1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Dirican EK, Ozgün OD, Akarsu S, Akin KO, Ercan O, Uğurlu M, et al. Clinical outcome of magnetic activated cell sorting of non-apoptotic spermatozoa before density gradient centrifugation for assisted reproduction. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2008;25:375–81.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Sánchez-Martín P, Dorado-Silva M, Sánchez-Martín F, González Martínez M, Johnston SD, Gosálvez J. Magnetic cell sorting of semen containing spermatozoa with high DNA fragmentation in ICSI cycles decreases miscarriage rate. Reprod BioMed Online. 2017;34:506–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Gil M, Sar-Shalom V, Melendez Sivira Y, Carreras R, Checa MA. Sperm selection using magnetic activated cell sorting (MACS) in assisted reproduction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2013;30:479–85.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Romany L, Garrido N, Motato Y, Aparicio B, Remohí J, Meseguer M. Removal of annexin V-positive sperm cells for intracytoplasmic sperm injection in ovum donation cycles does not improve reproductive outcome: a controlled and randomized trial in unselected males. Fertil Steril. 2014;102:1567–75.e1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Golob B, Poljak M, Verdenik I, Kolbezen Simoniti M, Vrtacnik Bokal E, Zorn B. High HPV infection prevalence in men from infertile couples and lack of relationship between seminal HPV infection and sperm quality. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:956901.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Kruger TF, Menkveld R, Stander FS, Lombard CJ, Van der Merwe JP, van Zyl JA, et al. Sperm morphologic features as a prognostic factor in in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 1986;46:1118–23.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Gardner DK, Lane M, Stevens J, Schlenker T, Schoolcraft WB. Blastocyst score affects implantation and pregnancy outcome: towards a single blastocyst transfer. Fertil Steril. 2000;73:1155–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Buzzi J, Valcarcel A, Lombardi E, Oses R, Rawe V, Young E. Magnetic activated cell sorting (MACS) improves oocyte donation results associated to severe male factor infertility. Hum Reprod. 2010;25(suppl 1):i118–52.

    Google Scholar 

  31. San Celestino M, Agudo D, Alonso M, Sanjurjo P, Becerra D, Bronet F, et al. Improved pregnancy rate after sperm magnetic separation technique in egg donation cycles using frozen sperm samples. Hum Reprod. 2011;26(suppl 1):i123–48.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Troya J, Zorrilla I. Annexin V-MACS in infertile couples as method for separation of sperm without DNA fragmentation. JBRA Assist Reprod. 2015;19:66–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Cakar Z, Cetinkaya B, Aras D, Koca B, Ozkavukcu S, Kaplanoglu İ, et al. Does combining magnetic-activated cell sorting with density gradient or swim-up improve sperm selection? J Assist Reprod Genet. 2016;33:1059–65.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Mrkun J, Dolensek T, Knific T, Pislar A, Kosec M, Kos J, et al. Elimination of apoptotic boar spermatozoa using magnetic activated cell sorting. Acta Vet Brno. 2014;83:13–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Said TM, Grunewald S, Paasch U, Glander HJ, Baumann T, Kriegel C, et al. Advantage of combining magnetic cell separation with sperm preparation techniques. Reprod BioMed Online. 2005;10:740–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Aziz N, Said T, Paasch U, Agarwal A. The relationship between human sperm apoptosis, morphology and the sperm deformity index. Hum Reprod. 2007;22:1413–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Nadalini M, Tarozzi N, Di Santo M, Borini A. Annexin V magnetic-activated cell sorting versus swim-up for the selection of human sperm in ART: is the new approach better then the traditional one? J Assist Reprod Genet. 2014;31:1045–51.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Curti G, Skowronek F, Vernochi R, Rodriguez-Buzzi AL, Rodriguez-Buzzi JC, Casanova G, et al. Morphological evaluation of sperm from infertile men selected by magnetic activated cell sorting (MACS). Reprod Biol. 2014;14:289–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Ménézo Y, Dale B, Cohen M. DNA damage and repair in human oocytes and embryos: a review. Zygote. 2010;18:357–65.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Barroso G, Valdespin C, Vega E, Kershenovich R, Avila R, Avendaño C, et al. Developmental sperm contributions: fertilization and beyond. Fertil Steril. 2009;92:835–48.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Schulte RT, Ohl DA, Sigman M, Smith GD. Sperm DNA damage in male infertility: etiologies, assays, and outcomes. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2010;27:3–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Speyer BE, Pizzey AR, Ranieri M, Joshi R, Delhanty JD, Serhal P. Fall in implantation rates following ICSI with sperm with high DNA fragmentation. Hum Reprod. 2010;25:1609–18.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Zini A, Boman JM, Belzile E, Ciampi A. Sperm DNA damage is associated with an increased risk of pregnancy loss after IVF and ICSI: systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod. 2008;23:2663–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Titus S, Li F, Stobezki R, Akula K, Unsal E, Jeong K, et al. Impairment of BRCA1-related DNA double-strand break repair leads to ovarian aging in mice and humans. Sci Transl Med. 2013;5:172ra21.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Degheidy T, Abdelfattah H, Seif A, Albuz FK, Gazi S, Abbas S. Magnetic activated cell sorting: an effective method for reduction of sperm DNA fragmentation in varicocele men prior to assisted reproductive techniques. Andrologia. 2015;47:892–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Vendrell X, Ferrer M, García-Mengual E, Muñoz P, Triviño JC, Calatayud C, et al. Correlation between aneuploidy, apoptotic markers and DNA fragmentation in spermatozoa from normozoospermic patients. Reprod BioMed Online. 2014;28:492–502.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Esbert M, Godo A, Soares SR, Florensa M, Amorós D, Ballesteros A, et al. Spermatozoa with numerical chromosomal abnormalities are more prone to be retained by Annexin V-MACS columns. Andrology. 2017;5:807–13.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Khalid SN, Qureshi IZ. Pregnancy rate improves in couples with unexplained infertility following intrauterine insemination (IUI) with magnetically selected non-apoptotic sperms. Fertil Steril. 2011;96:S25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank all gynecologists, clinical embryologists, medical nurses, and other staff of the Reproductive Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, for all the support. We would like to thank also our Andrology Laboratory for the semen analysis.

Funding

The study was funded with tertiary project of University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Slovenia, granted to Dr. Martin Stimpfel.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin Stimpfel.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Stimpfel, M., Verdenik, I., Zorn, B. et al. Magnetic-activated cell sorting of non-apoptotic spermatozoa improves the quality of embryos according to female age: a prospective sibling oocyte study. J Assist Reprod Genet 35, 1665–1674 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-018-1242-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-018-1242-1

Keywords

Navigation