Abstract
Purpose
The purposes of this study were to evaluate public opinion regarding fertility treatment and gamete cryopreservation for transgender individuals and identify how support varies by demographic characteristics.
Methods
This is a cross-sectional web-based survey study completed by a representative sample of 1111 US residents aged 18–75 years. Logistic regression was used to calculate odd ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of support for/opposition to fertility treatments for transgender people by demographic characteristics, adjusting a priori for age, gender, race, and having a biological child.
Results
Of 1336 people recruited, 1111 (83.2%) agreed to participate, and 986 (88.7%) completed the survey. Most respondents (76.2%) agreed that “Doctors should be able to help transgender people have biological children.” Atheists/agnostics were more likely to be in support (88.5%) than Christian–Protestants (72.4%; OR = 3.10, CI = 1.37–7.02), as were younger respondents, sexual minorities, those divorced/widowed, Democrats, and non-parents. Respondents who did not know a gay person (10.0%; OR = 0.20, CI = 0.09–0.42) or only knew a gay person without children (41.4%; OR = 0.29, CI = 0.17–0.50) were more often opposed than those who knew a gay parent (48.7%). No differences in gender, geography, education, or income were observed. A smaller majority of respondents supported doctors helping transgender minors preserve gametes before transitioning (60.6%) or helping transgender men carry pregnancies (60.1%).
Conclusions
Most respondents who support assisted and third-party reproduction also support such interventions to help transgender people have children.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Conron KJ, Scott G, Stowell GS, Landers SJ. Transgender health in Massachusetts: results from a household probability sample of adults. Am J Public Health. 2012;102(1):118–22.
Collin L, Reisner SL, Tangpricha V, Goodman M. Prevalence of transgender depends on the “case” definition: a systematic review. J Sex Med. Elsevier. 2016;13(4):613–26.
Wierckx K, Van Caenegem E, Pennings G, Elaut E, Dedecker D, Van de Peer F, et al. Reproductive wish in transsexual men. Hum Reprod. 2012;27(2):483–7.
De Sutter P, Kira K, Verschoor A, Hotimsky A. The desire to have children and the preservation of fertility in transsexual women: a survey. Int J Transgenderism. 2002;6(3):215–21.
Obedin-Maliver J, Makadon HJ. Transgender men and pregnancy. Obstet Med. 2016;9(1):4–8.
Gates GJ. How many people are lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender? Available at: http://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/wp-content/uploads/Gates-How-Many-People-LGBT-Apr-2011.pdf. (2011). Accessed 12 Mar 2017.
Stroumsa D. The state of transgender health care: policy, law, and medical frameworks. Am J Public Health. 2014;104(3):e31–8.
Tornello SL, Bos H. Parenting intentions among transgender individuals. LGBT Health. 2017;4(2):115–20.
De Sutter P. Gender reassignment and assisted reproduction: present and future reproductive options for transsexual people. Hum Reprod. 2001;16(4):612–4.
T’Sjoen G, Van Caenegem E, Wierckx K. Transgenderism and reproduction. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes. 2013;20(6):575–9.
Wallace SA, Blough KL, Kondapalli LA. Fertility preservation in the transgender patient: expanding oncofertility care beyond cancer. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2014;30(12):868–71.
Murphy TF. The ethics of fertility preservation in transgender body modifications. J Bioeth Inq. 2012;9(3):311–6.
Shires DA, Jaffee K. Factors associated with health care discrimination experiences among a national sample of female-to-male transgender individuals. Health Soc Work. 2015;40(2):134–41.
De Roo C, Tilleman K, T’Sjoen G, De Sutter P. Fertility options in transgender people. Int Rev psychiatry. 2016;28(1):112–9.
Hembree WC, Cohen-Kettenis P, Delemarre-van de Waal HA, Gooren LJ, Meyer WJ, Spack NP, et al. Endocrine treatment of transsexual persons: an Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009;94(9):3132–54.
James-Abra S, Tarasoff LA, Green D, Epstein R, Anderson S, Marvel S, et al. Trans people’s experiences with assisted reproduction services: a qualitative study. Hum Reprod. 2015;30(6):1365–74.
Jaffee KD, Shires DA, Stroumsa D. Discrimination and delayed health care among transgender women and men: implications for improving medical education and health care delivery. Med Care. 2016;54(11):1010–6.
Unger CA. Care of the transgender patient: the role of the gynecologist. Am J Obstet Gynecol Elsevier. 2014;210(1):16–26.
Scout. Transgender health and well-being: gains and opportunities in policy and law. Am J Orthop. 2016;86(4):378–83.
White Hughto JM, Murchison GR, Clark K, Pachankis JE, Reisner SL. Geographic and individual differences in healthcare access for U.S. transgender adults: a multilevel analysis. LGBT Health. 2016;3(6):424–33.
Landers S, Kapadia F. The health of the transgender community: out, proud, and coming into their own. Am J Public Health. 2017;107(2):205–6.
Grant JM, Mottet LA, Tanis J, With DM, Herman JL, Harrison J, et al. National transgender discrimination survey report on health and healthcare: findings of a study by the national center for transgender equality and national gay and lesbian task force. 2010. Available at: http://www.thetaskforce.org/static_html/downloads/resources_and_tools/ntds_report_on_health.pdf. Accessed 12 Mar 2017.
Burstein P. The impact of public opinion on public policy: a review and an agenda. Polit Res Q. Sage Publications Sage CA: Thousand Oaks, CA. 2003;56(1):29–40.
Blendon RJ, Benson JM. Americans’ views on health policy: a fifty-year historical perspective. Health Aff (Millwood). 2001;20(2):33–46.
Pacheco J, Maltby E. The role of public opinion—does it influence the diffusion of ACA decisions? J Health Polit Policy Law. 2017;42(2):309–40.
Lee MS, Farland LV, Missmer SA, Ginsburg ES. Limitations on the compensation of gamete donors: a public opinion survey. Fertil Steril. 2017;107(6):1355–63. e4
Mok-Lin E, Missmer S, Berry K, Lehmann LS, Ginsburg ES. Public perceptions of providing IVF services to cancer and HIV patients. Fertil Steril. 2011;96(3):722–7. e1
Lewis EI, Missmer SA, Farland LV, Ginsburg ES. Public support in the United States for elective oocyte cryopreservation. Fertil Steril. 2016;106(5):1183–9.
Adashi EY, Cohen J, Hamberger L, Jones HW, de Kretser DM, Lunenfeld B, et al. Public perception on infertility and its treatment: an international survey. The Bertarelli Foundation Scientific Board. Hum Reprod. 2000;15(2):330–4.
Light AD, Obedin-Maliver J, Sevelius JM, Kerns JL. Transgender men who experienced pregnancy after female-to-male gender transitioning. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;124(6):1120–7.
Dekker MJHJ, Wierckx K, Van Caenegem E, Klaver M, Kreukels BP, Elaut E, et al. A European network for the investigation of gender incongruence: endocrine part. J Sex Med Elsevier. 2016;13(6):994–9.
Fugate SR, Apodaca CC, Hibbert ML. Gender reassignment surgery and the gynecological patient. Prim Care Update Ob Gyns. 2001;8(1):22–4.
Dhejne C, Öberg K, Arver S, Landén M. An analysis of all applications for sex reassignment surgery in Sweden, 1960-2010: prevalence, incidence, and regrets. Arch Sex Behav. 2014;43(8):1535–45.
U.S. Census Bureau. Statistical abstract of the United States. 2012. Available at: https://www.census.gov/library/publications/2011/compendia/statab/131ed/elections.html. Accessed 12 Mar 2017.
Saad L. Heavily Democratic states are concentrated in the East. 2012. Available from: http://www.gallup.com/poll/156437/heavily-democratic-states-concentrated-east.aspx. Accessed 12 Mar 2017.
Acknowledgements
Funding information
This study was funded by an intramural grant from the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at Brigham and Women’s Hospital. This funding provided monetary support for data collection.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
E.G. receives royalties from UpToDate, Springer, and BioMed Central and receives research funding from Serono unrelated to this work. R.A. is a consultant for the New England Cryogenic Center. The remaining authors report no conflicts of interest.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Additional information
The findings from this study were presented as a poster at the 72nd American Society for Reproductive Medicine annual meeting in Salt Lake City, UT from October 15 to 19, 2016.
Electronic supplementary material
ESM 1
(DOCX 27 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Goldman, R.H., Kaser, D.J., Missmer, S.A. et al. Fertility treatment for the transgender community: a public opinion study. J Assist Reprod Genet 34, 1457–1467 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-017-1035-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-017-1035-y