Selection of mitochondria in female germline cells: is Balbiani body implicated in this process?
- 990 Downloads
Early oocytes of nearly all animal species contain a transient organelle assemblage termed the Balbiani body. Structure and composition of this assemblage may vary even between closely related species. Despite this variability, the Balbiani body always comprises of numerous tightly clustered mitochondria and accumulations of nuage material. It has been suggested that the Balbiani body is an evolutionarily ancestral structure, which plays a role in various processes such as the localization of organelles and macromolecules to the germ plasm, lipidogenesis, as well as the selection/elimination of dysfunctional mitochondria from female germline cells. We suggest that the selection/elimination of mitochondria is a primary and evolutionarily ancestral function of Balbiani body, and that the other functions are secondary, evolutionarily derived additions. We propose a simple model explaining the role of the Balbiani body in the selection of mitochondria, i.e., in the mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) bottleneck phenomenon.
KeywordsBalbiani body mtDNA bottleneck Mitochondrial network Selection of mitochondria Oocyte
In all animal species, mitochondria (containing molecules of mtDNA) are inherited from one generation to the next in a non-Mendelian manner, exclusively being passed on only by the mother. Several lines of evidence suggest that mitochondria overloaded with mutations in mtDNA are selectively eliminated from the growing oocytes [1, 2, 3, 4]. Although, the mechanism of this purifying selection is far from being understood, it is widely accepted that it relies on the mtDNA bottleneck phenomenon [5, 6, 7, 8], which involves an expansion of healthy mitochondria within the oocyte cytoplasm (ooplasm), selective directional transport of mitochondria to the germ plasm (located at the vegetal cortex in frogs and the posterior oocyte pole in holometabolous insects), and elimination of dysfunctional mitochondria by apoptosis of oocytes with excessive deleterious mtDNA mutations [1, 2, 4]. It has recently been proposed that the selection of mitochondria in developing oocytes is related to the formation and dispersion of the Balbiani body [3, 8, 9]. We will explore this idea and present a model explaining the role of the Balbiani body in the bottleneck phenomenon and elimination of dysfunctional mitochondria from the growing oocytes.
Mitochondria and mitochondrial dynamics
Mitochondria are semi-autonomous organelles that contain their own genome (mtDNA) and protein synthesis machinery. The most important role of mitochondria is to supply cells with metabolic energy (ATP) generated by oxidative phosphorylation. Apart from generating ATP, oxidative phosphorylation produces reactive oxygen species (ROS), which predispose mtDNA to mutations. Gradual accumulation of these mutations leads, in turn, to numerous deleterious effects, including a loss of metabolic functions and decline in mitochondrial bioenergetic capacity. It is well established that these negative effects are counteracted by the process termed “mitochondrial dynamics” or “mitochondrial homeostasis.”
Mitochondrial dynamics involves two opposed processes: mitochondrial fusion and fission. Disruption of mitochondrial fusion prevents formation of mitochondrial networks and leads to maintaining mitochondria individuality, whereas obliterating fission results in the formation of extensive mitochondrial networks (hyperfused networks). Thus, the actual morphology of mitochondria in a differentiating or proliferating cell depends on a balance between mitochondrial fusion and fission (reviewed in [10, 11]). What is important, both fusion and fission are implicated in maintenance and inheritance of mtDNA: damaged mitochondria (containing mutated mtDNA) might be rescued by fusion or eliminated after fission, i.e., after separation from the network [12, 13, 14, 15]. The fusion and fission are mediated by specific proteins belonging to the family of Dynamins. In humans, three main proteins involved in fusion are Optic atrophy 1 (OPA1) and the two mitofusins, MFN1 and MFN2. The major regulator of mitochondrial fission is a highly conserved Dynamin-related protein 1 (Drp1) (see  for a review).
Damaged mitochondria, separated from the network by fission, are subsequently eliminated by mitophagy (a specific type of authophagy that removes old and dysfunctional organelles). The mitophagy involves the cooperation of two proteins: the kinase PINK1 (PTEN-induced putative kinase 1) and cytosolic E3 ubiquitin ligase Parkin. The PINK1/Parkin system acts as a sensor for mitochondrial quality and is activated after the loss of the inner membrane potential of the mitochondria (see [16, 17] for a review). Interestingly, the mutations in PINK1 and Parkin genes have been identified as the genetic risk factors in familiar cases of Parkinson’s disease.
Balbiani body: composition and suggested functions
Early oocytes of almost all studied animal species contain transient organelle assemblage called the Balbiani body (Bb) or “mitochondrial cloud”. Structure and composition of the Bb differ even in closely related species and are highly dynamic during subsequent stages of oogenesis. Despite this variability, the Bb always contains two essential elements: numerous tightly clustered mitochondria and accumulations of electron-dense granulo-fibrillar material, known as the nuage (molecular composition of nuage is discussed in [18, 19, 20, 21]). The Bb may also comprise of Golgi complexes, elements of rough (coated with ribosomes) and smooth (lacking bound ribosomes) endoplasmic reticulum and centrioles [21, 22]. The composition of the Bb has been best described and understood in two model vertebrates: the frog, Xenopus laevis, and the fish, Danio rerio. In Xenopus oocytes, the Bb forms during early oogenesis by a gradual aggregation and multiplication of mitochondria around the pair of centrioles, i.e., the centrosome . The stage I (previtellogenic) Xenopus oocyte contains fully developed spherical Bb located next to the oocyte nucleus and composed of thousands of mitochondria interspersed with accumulations of nuage, Golgi complexes, and elements of the rough endoplasmic reticulum (RER). The formation of Bb breaks the symmetry of oocyte cytoplasm and leads to its clear separation into animal (containing the oocyte nucleus) and vegetal (containing the Bb) hemispheres. At the same time, a future animal-vegetal axis of the embryo is established. During later stages of oogenesis, the Bb disperses and its constituents are transported toward the vegetal pole of the oocyte. Recent molecular studies have shown that the Xenopus Bb contains proteins and localized maternal RNAs implicated in the formation of the germ cell determinants (the germ plasm) (reviewed in ). The most up-to-date lists of molecular components of Xenopus Bb and Bb-derived germ plasm are tabulated in [23, 24]. In general, mRNA components can be grouped into three categories: (1) mRNAs encoding RNA-binding proteins, e.g., Nanos2 (Xcat2), Xdazl, and Hermes; (2) mRNAs encoding proteins involved in primordial germ cell migration; and (3) mRNAs implicated in recruitment of the germ plasm components such as Xpat and Xlsirts. Proteins identified in Xenopus Bb belong to various categories, such as translational repressors, anti-transposon factors, cell cycle regulators, and proteins involved in transport, as well as the localization of RNAs . Although it remains unknown how the structural and molecular components of the frog and fish Bbs are assembled into such structurally intricate assemblage, it has been shown that two genes—bucky ball and Xvelo (in Danio and Xenopus, respectively)—are required for the Bb formation. Most recently, elegant molecular studies have indicated that Xvelo encodes a disordered protein with an N-terminal prion-like domain, and that this protein is an abundant constituent of the Xenopus Bb . In the light of these results, it has been suggested that the frog Bb is formed by amyloid-like self-assembly of Xvelo, accompanied by a co-recruitment of mitochondria and RNAs . It is important to add here that self-assembly of Xvelo, implicated in the formation of the Bb in frog oocytes, resembles the self-assembly of amyloid-β peptide engaged in the formation of amyloid plaques in Alzheimer’s diseased brain.
The Bb is also present in the oocytes of mammals, including mice and humans [26, 27, 28]. Ultrastructural studies have shown that mouse Bb is organized around the centrosome and consists of Golgi complexes surrounded by numerous aggregated mitochondria interspersed with elongated cisternae of the RER [27, 28]. Interestingly, it has been estimated that in mice oocytes, the number of mitochondria remaining in direct physical contact increases significantly (from 21 to 58%) during the formation of the Bb . This previously omitted observation suggests that in mammals, as in insects (see section “Balbiani body: 3D organization”), mitochondria of the Bb may form a more or less extensive network.
T. domestica belongs to the basal insect clade Zygentoma (silverfish), which suggests that in this species, ancestral mechanisms can operate during formation and dispersion of the Bb;
The Bb of this species is relatively small and consists of limited number of organelles that obviously simplifies analyses, especially at an EM level;
The oocytes and eggs of T. domestica are roughly spherical and do not comprise of any specialized region, e.g., the germ plasm, implying that the Bb in this basal insect is not involved in directional localization of mRNAs and/or organelles to certain oocyte region as it is in model species (frog or fish).
participation in the formation of lipid droplets (in certain spiders) .
It has been suggested, in this context, that the Bb represents an evolutionarily ancestral structure involved in the localization and/or enrichment of maternal macromolecules (RNAs) and organelles (mitochondria) to certain oocyte regions (reviewed in ).
Balbiani body: 3D organization
Balbiani body: physiological state of Bb mitochondria
Since the pioneering work of Tourte and colleagues , it has been well established that the Bb mitochondria physiologically differ from those located outside the Bb [46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51]. Furthermore, more recent analyses involving incubation of oocytes in media supplemented with fluorescent probes (MitoTracker, JC-1) have indicated that the mitochondria constituting the Bb show higher inner membrane potential [9, 50, 52] (Fig. 1b). These observations have led to an assumption that only high membrane potential mitochondria are recruited to the Bb [3, 8] and that mitochondria with lowered membrane potential (i.e., overloaded with mutations in mtDNA) are excluded from the Bb and subsequently eliminated by mitophagy . Thus, only the most fit and active mitochondria are transmitted to the next generation [3, 4, 8, 53].
Conclusions: a model explaining selection of mitochondria in oocytes
Animal ovaries fall into two morphologically and physiologically different categories: panoistic and meroistic. This clearly dichotomous split should be taken into consideration while interpreting data summarized in this review. Therefore, we will start this section with a very short description of two basic ovarian categories. For comprehensive and detailed description of all ovarian types and subtypes, see [39, 54, 55, 56, 57].
Panoistic ovaries are characteristics for fish, amphibians, and the majority of invertebrates, e.g., spiders, higher crustaceans, and hemimetabolous insects. In this ovary type, all female germline cells (with exception of degenerating ones) develop into fertilizable egg cells. This implies that all the mitochondria of a given egg are descendants of the mitochondria of a single oogonial cell. Merositic ovaries have been found in annelids, lower crustaceans, holometabolous insects, including the fruit fly and certain lizards. Here, the oocytes develop within syncytial cysts (clusters) of sibling germline cells . In each cluster, usually only one cell differentiates into the oocyte, whereas the others become supporting nurse cells. During oogenesis, the growing oocyte receives organelles, including mitochondria, and various macromolecules from associated nurse cells. Interestingly, it has been recently shown that also murine ovaries are meroistic; murine oocytes develop in syncytial cysts and acquire organelles from sister “nurse” cells [58, 59]. This, in turn, implies that in mice as well as in other species with meroistic ovaries, the mitochondria of a given egg cell may originate from several interconnected sibling cells.
The Bb forms around the centrosome (vertebrates) or nuage (insects). At this early stage of formation, the Bb mitochondria are not specifically selected, but instead they are chosen randomly. Thus, the Bbs of sibling germline cells stochastically receive mitochondria in various functional (physiological) states.
As oogenesis progresses, the Bb mitochondria multiply and fuse forming an extensive hyperfused network.
Dysfunctional mitochondria (containing mutated mtDNA) are separated from the network and eliminated by mitophagy.
After dispersion of the Bb (Fig. 5b), healthy selected mitochondria can populate the whole ooplasm (in Thermobia) or they are transferred to the germ plasm, i.e., the vegetal cortex in Xenopus or the posterior oocyte pole in the fruit fly and other holometabolous insects.
The proposed scenario agrees well with existing theoretical models of the mitochondrial quality control assuming that fusion, fission, and mitophagy together increase mitochondrial functionality (reviewed in ). It is obvious that the proposed scenario should be slightly modified in the case of polytrophic ovaries, especially when mitochondria from several sibling cells participate in the formation of the Bb [35, 58, 59].
It is well established that in the ovaries of almost all investigated species, the large proportion of germline cells (up to 18% in Thermobia, 70% in mammals) are eliminated via apoptosis (Fig. 5d) (see [61, 62] for further reading). In this context, we suggest that the selection of the mitochondria in the female germline occurs in two steps. The first step operates in the cytoplasm of germline cells and involves selection of mitochondria within the Bb. In the second step, the germline cells that have not been successfully “cleared of,” deleterious mtDNA mutations are removed by apoptosis (Fig. 5). This two-step model agrees well with earlier suggestions that in mammalian ovaries, apoptosis of germline cells is induced by oxidative stress and that mitochondria overloaded with severe mutations in mtDNA produce more ROS and thus are preferentially eliminated [1, 62].
The accumulated data clearly indicate that in different animal lineages the Bb might be involved in various cellular processes. Among these are selection/elimination of defective germline mitochondria carrying mtDNA mutations, directional transport of organelles and macromolecules to the germ plasm, and formation of lipid droplets. The fact that the Bbs are present in all animal oocytes, regardless of whether they contain the germ plasm or not indicates that mitochondrial selection/elimination represents a primary and ancestral role for the Bb, whereas the other two functions are secondary and evolutionarily novel—having been adopted during the evolution of certain animal taxa. Interestingly, the directional transport function evolved in groups characterized by the preformation of the germ plasm (germline determinants), while the lipidogenesis function emerged only in a single arthropod lineage.
This proposed idea will require further investigation for its verification using both model and non-model species. Modern techniques of 3D imaging, such as EM tomography and serial block-face scanning electron microscopy (SBEM) [63, 64] would simplify and speed up this scientific inquiry. Molecular and genetic studies will be also crucial for justifying the suggested involvement of the Bb in the mtDNA bottleneck in mammalian and non-mammalian oocytes.
We are grateful to Wladyslawa Jankowska and Elzbieta Kisiel for their excellent technical support. Transmission electron (Jeol JEM 2100) and confocal (Zeiss LSM 510 Meta) microscopes were made available through the Laboratory of Microscopy, Department of Cell Biology and Imaging, Institute of Zoology and Biomedical Research of Jagiellonian University. The study was funded by a research grant K/ZDS/006317.
Compliance with ethical standards
All applicable international, national, and institutional guidelines for the animal use were followed.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 24.Kloc M, Ghobrial RM, Kubiak JZ. Recent advances in the understanding of germ cell specific organelles and their functions. In: Perotte A, editor. Recent advances in germ cells research. New York: Cell Biology Research Progress. Nova Science Publishing; 2013. p. 41–70.Google Scholar
- 31.Petit J. Etude morphologique et cytochimique de deux types de groupements mitochondriaux dans les jeunes ovocytes de Polydesmus angustus Latz. (Myriapode, Diplopode). J Microsc. 1973;17:41–54.Google Scholar
- 32.Caplet J. Etude ultarstructurale de “corps acidophiles” des ovocytes d’un myriapode. Resultats preliminaires Biologie Cellulaire. 1981;42:197–200.Google Scholar
- 39.Bilinski SM, Kubiak JZ, Kloc M. Asymmetric divisions in oogenesis. In: Tassan J-P, Kubiak JZ, editors. Results & problems in cell differentiation, Asymmetric cell division in development, differentiation and cancer, vol. 61. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2017. p. 211–28.Google Scholar
- 54.Büning J. The insect ovary. Ultrastructure, previtellogenic growth and evolution. London: Chapman & Hall; 1994.Google Scholar
- 64.Plachno BJ, Swiatek P, Jobson RW, Malota K, Brutkowski W. Serial block face SEM visualization of unusual plant nuclear tubular extensions in a carnivorous plant (Utricularia, Lentibulariaceae). Ann Bot. 2017; doi: 10.1093/aob/mcx042.
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.