Advertisement

Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics

, Volume 33, Issue 9, pp 1175–1184 | Cite as

GnRH agonist with low-dose hCG (dual trigger) is associated with higher risk of severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome compared to GnRH agonist alone

  • Kathleen E. O’NeillEmail author
  • Suneeta Senapati
  • Ivy Maina
  • Clarisa Gracia
  • Anuja Dokras
Assisted Reproduction Technologies

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to compare rates of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) after using gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRHa) alone and GnRHa in combination with low-dose human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG, dual trigger) for final oocyte maturation in women undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH).

Methods

A retrospective cohort study was conducted at an academic center. Study population included 108 women who received GnRHa trigger and 66 women who received dual trigger (GnRHa + low-dose [1000 IU] hCG trigger). The main outcome measure was OHSS. Secondary outcomes included total oocyte yield and oocyte maturity.

Results

The incidence of early OHSS was significantly higher after dual trigger than GnRHa trigger (8.6 vs 0 %). Moreover, four of the six patients that developed OHSS developed severe OHSS. Logistic modeling revealed that the combination of age, BMI, baseline AFC, and E2 >4000 pg/mL was predictive of OHSS with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.84 and was superior to each factor alone. Adjusted analyses revealed that dual trigger was associated with a higher number of total oocytes (adjusted OR 1.27; 95 % confidence interval, 1.18, 1.38) and percentage of mature oocytes (AOR 1.10; 95 % confidence interval, 1.03, 1.17) obtained compared to GnRHa trigger alone.

Conclusions

Dual trigger for final oocyte maturation using GnRHa and low-dose hCG is associated with a significantly increased risk of severe OHSS compared to GnRH alone. However, dual trigger may be associated with a modest increase in oocyte yield, both in terms of number and maturity.

Keywords

Dual trigger GnRHa trigger Low-dose hCG Oocyte maturity OHSS 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. For this type of study, formal consent is not required.

References

  1. 1.
    Brinsden PR, Wada I, Tan SL, Balen A, Jacobs HS. Diagnosis, prevention and management of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1995;102(10):767–72.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Golan A, Weissman A. Symposium: update on prediction and management of OHSS. A modern classification of OHSS. Reprod Biomed Online. 2009;19(1):28–32.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Forman RG, Frydman R, Egan D, Ross C, Barlow DH. Severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome using agonists of gonadotropin-releasing hormone for in vitro fertilization: a European series and a proposal for prevention. Fertil Steril. 1990;53(3):502–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Navot D, Bergh PA, Laufer N. Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in novel reproductive technologies: prevention and treatment. Fertil Steril. 1992;58(2):249–61.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mathur RS, Akande AV, Keay SD, Hunt LP, Jenkins JM. Distinction between early and late ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Fertil Steril. 2000;73(5):901–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Practice Committe of the American Society for Reproductive M. Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Fertil Steril. 2003;80(5):1309–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Whelan 3rd JG, Vlahos NF. The ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Fertil Steril. 2000;73(5):883–96.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Blankstein J, Shalev J, Saadon T, Kukia EE, Rabinovici J, Pariente C, et al. Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: prediction by number and size of preovulatory ovarian follicles. Fertil Steril. 1987;47(4):597–602.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Klemetti R, Sevon T, Gissler M, Hemminki E. Complications of IVF and ovulation induction. Hum Reprod. 2005;20(12):3293–300. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dei253.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Swanton A, Storey L, McVeigh E, Child T. IVF outcome in women with PCOS, PCO and normal ovarian morphology. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010;149(1):68–71. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2009.11.017.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Engmann L, DiLuigi A, Schmidt D, Nulsen J, Maier D, Benadiva C. The use of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist to induce oocyte maturation after cotreatment with GnRH antagonist in high-risk patients undergoing in vitro fertilization prevents the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: a prospective randomized controlled study. Fertil Steril. 2008;89(1):84–91. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.02.002.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Engmann L, Siano L, Schmidt D, Nulsen J, Maier D, Benadiva C. GnRH agonist to induce oocyte maturation during IVF in patients at high risk of OHSS. Reprod Biomed Online. 2006;13(5):639–44.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    DiLuigi AJ, Engmann L, Schmidt DW, Maier DB, Nulsen JC, Benadiva CA. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist to induce final oocyte maturation prevents the development of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in high-risk patients and leads to improved clinical outcomes compared with coasting. Fertil Steril. 2010;94(3):1111–4. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.10.034.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gonen Y, Balakier H, Powell W, Casper RF. Use of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist to trigger follicular maturation for in vitro fertilization. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1990;71(4):918–22. doi: 10.1210/jcem-71-4-918.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kolibianakis EM, Schultze-Mosgau A, Schroer A, van Steirteghem A, Devroey P, Diedrich K, et al. A lower ongoing pregnancy rate can be expected when GnRH agonist is used for triggering final oocyte maturation instead of HCG in patients undergoing IVF with GnRH antagonists. Hum Reprod. 2005;20(10):2887–92. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dei150.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Humaidan P, Bredkjaer HE, Bungum L, Bungum M, Grondahl ML, Westergaard L, et al. GnRH agonist (buserelin) or hCG for ovulation induction in GnRH antagonist IVF/ICSI cycles: a prospective randomized study. Hum Reprod. 2005;20(5):1213–20. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deh765.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Griesinger G, Diedrich K, Devroey P, Kolibianakis EM. GnRH agonist for triggering final oocyte maturation in the GnRH antagonist ovarian hyperstimulation protocol: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2006;12(2):159–68. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmi045.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Youssef MA, Van der Veen F, Al-Inany HG, Mochtar MH, Griesinger G, Nagi Mohesen M, et al. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist versus HCG for oocyte triggering in antagonist-assisted reproductive technology. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;10:CD008046. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008046.pub4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Engmann L, Benadiva C. Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome prevention strategies: luteal support strategies to optimize pregnancy success in cycles with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist ovulatory trigger. Semin Reprod Med. 2010;28(6):506–12. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1265678.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Castillo JC, Garcia-Velasco J, Humaidan P. Empty follicle syndrome after GnRHa triggering versus hCG triggering in COS. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2012;29(3):249–53. doi: 10.1007/s10815-011-9704-8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Humaidan P, Bungum L, Bungum M, Yding AC. Rescue of corpus luteum function with peri-ovulatory HCG supplementation in IVF/ICSI GnRH antagonist cycles in which ovulation was triggered with a GnRH agonist: a pilot study. Reprod Biomed Online. 2006;13(2):173–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Humaidan P, Ejdrup Bredkjaer H, Westergaard LG, Yding AC. 1,500 IU human chorionic gonadotropin administered at oocyte retrieval rescues the luteal phase when gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist is used for ovulation induction: a prospective, randomized, controlled study. Fertil Steril. 2010;93(3):847–54. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.12.042.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Humaidan P. Luteal phase rescue in high-risk OHSS patients by GnRHa triggering in combination with low-dose HCG: a pilot study. Reprod Biomed Online. 2009;18(5):630–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Iliodromiti S, Blockeel C, Tremellen KP, Fleming R, Tournaye H, Humaidan P, et al. Consistent high clinical pregnancy rates and low ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome rates in high-risk patients after GnRH agonist triggering and modified luteal support: a retrospective multicentre study. Hum Reprod. 2013;28(9):2529–36. doi: 10.1093/humrep/det304.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Radesic B, Tremellen K. Oocyte maturation employing a GnRH agonist in combination with low-dose hCG luteal rescue minimizes the severity of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome while maintaining excellent pregnancy rates. Hum Reprod. 2011;26(12):3437–42. doi: 10.1093/humrep/der333.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Seyhan A, Ata B, Polat M, Son WY, Yarali H, Dahan MH. Severe early ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome following GnRH agonist trigger with the addition of 1500 IU hCG. Hum Reprod. 2013;28(9):2522–8. doi: 10.1093/humrep/det124.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Datta AK, Eapen A, Birch H, Kurinchi-Selvan A, Lockwood G. Retrospective comparison of GnRH agonist trigger with HCG trigger in GnRH antagonist cycles in anticipated high-responders. Reprod Biomed Online. 2014;29(5):552–8. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2014.08.006.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Shapiro BS, Daneshmand ST, Garner FC, Aguirre M, Hudson C. Comparison of “triggers” using leuprolide acetate alone or in combination with low-dose human chorionic gonadotropin. Fertil Steril. 2011;95(8):2715–7. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.03.109.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Griffin D, Benadiva C, Kummer N, Budinetz T, Nulsen J, Engmann L. Dual trigger of oocyte maturation with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist and low-dose human chorionic gonadotropin to optimize live birth rates in high responders. Fertil Steril. 2012;97(6):1316–20. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.03.015.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Schmidt DW, Maier DB, Nulsen JC, Benadiva CA. Reducing the dose of human chorionic gonadotropin in high responders does not affect the outcomes of in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 2004;82(4):841–6. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.03.055.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Rotterdam EA-SPCWG. Revised 2003 consensus on diagnostic criteria and long-term health risks related to polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil Steril. 2004;81(1):19–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kummer NE, Feinn RS, Griffin DW, Nulsen JC, Benadiva CA, Engmann LL. Predicting successful induction of oocyte maturation after gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) trigger. Hum Reprod. 2013;28(1):152–9. doi: 10.1093/humrep/des361.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Golan A, Ron-el R, Herman A, Soffer Y, Weinraub Z, Caspi E. Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: an update review. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1989;44(6):430–40.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Lainas TG, Sfontouris IA, Zorzovilis IZ, Petsas GK, Lainas GT, Kolibianakis EM. Management of severe early ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome by re-initiation of GnRH antagonist. Reprod Biomed Online. 2007;15(4):408–12.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Shapiro BS, Daneshmand ST, Garner FC, Aguirre M, Thomas S. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist combined with a reduced dose of human chorionic gonadotropin for final oocyte maturation in fresh autologous cycles of in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 2008;90(1):231–3. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.06.030.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Datta AK, Vitthala S, Tozer A, Zosmer A, Sabatini L, Davis C, et al. Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for low responders in in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a low-dose flare protocol. Fertil Steril. 2011;95(5):1809–12. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.11.049.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Haning Jr RV, Austin CW, Carlson IH, Kuzma DL, Shapiro SS, Zweibel WJ. Plasma estradiol is superior to ultrasound and urinary estriol glucuronide as a predictor of ovarian hyperstimulation during induction of ovulation with menotropins. Fertil Steril. 1983;40(1):31–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Asch RH, Li HP, Balmaceda JP, Weckstein LN, Stone SC. Severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in assisted reproductive technology: definition of high risk groups. Hum Reprod. 1991;6(10):1395–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Schenker JG. Prevention and treatment of ovarian hyperstimulation. Hum Reprod. 1993;8(5):653–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Aboulghar MA, Mansour RT. Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: classifications and critical analysis of preventive measures. Hum Reprod Update. 2003;9(3):275–89.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Gomez R, Simon C, Remohi J, Pellicer A. Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 activation induces vascular permeability in hyperstimulated rats, and this effect is prevented by receptor blockade. Endocrinology. 2002;143(11):4339–48. doi: 10.1210/en.2002-220204.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    McClure N, Healy DL, Rogers PA, Sullivan J, Beaton L, Haning Jr RV, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor as capillary permeability agent in ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Lancet. 1994;344(8917):235–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Soares SR, Gomez R, Simon C, Garcia-Velasco JA, Pellicer A. Targeting the vascular endothelial growth factor system to prevent ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Hum Reprod Update. 2008;14(4):321–33. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmn008.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Pellicer A, Albert C, Mercader A, Bonilla-Musoles F, Remohi J, Simon C. The pathogenesis of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: in vivo studies investigating the role of interleukin-1beta, interleukin-6, and vascular endothelial growth factor. Fertil Steril. 1999;71(3):482–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Wang TH, Horng SG, Chang CL, Wu HM, Tsai YJ, Wang HS, et al. Human chorionic gonadotropin-induced ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome is associated with up-regulation of vascular endothelial growth factor. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002;87(7):3300–8. doi: 10.1210/jcem.87.7.8651.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Hoff JD, Quigley ME, Yen SS. Hormonal dynamics at midcycle: a reevaluation. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1983;57(4):792–6. doi: 10.1210/jcem-57-4-792.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Itskovitz J, Boldes R, Levron J, Erlik Y, Kahana L, Brandes JM. Induction of preovulatory luteinizing hormone surge and prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome by gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist. Fertil Steril. 1991;56(2):213–20.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Haas J, Ophir L, Barzilay E, Yerushalmi GM, Yung Y, Kedem A, et al. GnRH agonist vs. hCG for triggering of ovulation—differential effects on gene expression in human granulosa cells. PLoS One. 2014;9(3):e90359. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0090359.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Cerrillo M, Rodriguez S, Mayoral M, Pacheco A, Martinez-Salazar J, Garcia-Velasco JA. Differential regulation of VEGF after final oocyte maturation with GnRH agonist versus hCG: a rationale for OHSS reduction. Fertil Steril. 2009;91(4 Suppl):1526–8. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.08.118.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Cerrillo M, Pacheco A, Rodriguez S, Gomez R, Delgado F, Pellicer A, et al. Effect of GnRH agonist and hCG treatment on VEGF, angiopoietin-2, and VE-cadherin: trying to explain the link to ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Fertil Steril. 2011;95(8):2517–9. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.12.054.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Abramov Y, Barak V, Nisman B, Schenker JG. Vascular endothelial growth factor plasma levels correlate to the clinical picture in severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Fertil Steril. 1997;67(2):261–5. doi: 10.1016/S0015-0282(97)81908-5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Artini PG, Fasciani A, Monti M, Luisi S, D'Ambrogio G, Genazzani AR. Changes in vascular endothelial growth factor levels and the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in women enrolled in an in vitro fertilization program. Fertil Steril. 1998;70(3):560–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Agrawal R, Tan SL, Wild S, Sladkevicius P, Engmann L, Payne N, et al. Serum vascular endothelial growth factor concentrations in in vitro fertilization cycles predict the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Fertil Steril. 1999;71(2):287–93.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Ludwig M, Jelkmann W, Bauer O, Diedrich K. Prediction of severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome by free serum vascular endothelial growth factor concentration on the day of human chorionic gonadotrophin administration. Hum Reprod. 1999;14(10):2437–41.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Humaidan P, Westergaard LG, Mikkelsen AL, Fukuda M, Yding AC. Levels of the epidermal growth factor-like peptide amphiregulin in follicular fluid reflect the mode of triggering ovulation: a comparison between gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist and urinary human chorionic gonadotrophin. Fertil Steril. 2011;95(6):2034–8. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.02.013.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Chuderland D, Ben-Ami I, Kaplan-Kraicer R, Grossman H, Ron-El R, Shalgi R. The role of pigment epithelium-derived factor in the pathophysiology and treatment of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in mice. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013;98(2):E258–66. doi: 10.1210/jc.2012-3037.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Miller I, Chuderland D, Ron-El R, Shalgi R, Ben-Ami I. GnRH agonist triggering modulates PEDF to VEGF ratio inversely to hCG in granulosa cells. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015;100(11):E1428–36. doi: 10.1210/jc.2015-2312.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Humaidan P, Kol S, Papanikolaou EG, Copenhagen Gn RHATWG. GnRH agonist for triggering of final oocyte maturation: time for a change of practice? Hum Reprod Update. 2011;17(4):510–24. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmr008.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Zelinski-Wooten MB, Hutchison JS, Trinchard-Lugan I, Hess DL, Wolf DP, Stouffer RL. Initiation of periovulatory events in gonadotrophin-stimulated macaques with varying doses of recombinant human chorionic gonadotrophin. Hum Reprod. 1997;12(9):1877–85.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Abdalla HI, Ah-Moye M, Brinsden P, Howe DL, Okonofua F, Craft I. The effect of the dose of human chorionic gonadotropin and the type of gonadotropin stimulation on oocyte recovery rates in an in vitro fertilization program. Fertil Steril. 1987;48(6):958–63.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Barski A, Cuddapah S, Cui K, Roh TY, Schones DE, Wang Z, et al. High-resolution profiling of histone methylations in the human genome. Cell. 2007;129(4):823–37. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.05.009.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kathleen E. O’Neill
    • 1
    Email author
  • Suneeta Senapati
    • 1
  • Ivy Maina
    • 2
  • Clarisa Gracia
    • 1
  • Anuja Dokras
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity of PennsylvaniaPennsylvaniaUSA
  2. 2.School of MedecineUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations