Skip to main content
Log in

Reduced blastocyst formation in reduced culture volume

  • Embryo Biology
  • Published:
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this prospective sibling oocyte study was to evaluate whether reduced culture volume improves blastocyst formation.

Methods

Twenty-three patients with extended embryo culture until day 5 were selected for the study. After injection, 345 sibling oocytes were individually cultured in either 25 or 7 μl droplets of Origio cleavage medium under oil. On day 3 of development, embryos were transferred to droplets with the corresponding volume of Origio blastocyst culture medium. Fertilization and embryo quality on day 3 and day 5/6 were evaluated.

Results

No statistically significant difference (p = 0.326) in fertilization rate was observed (81.3 versus 83.0 %). There was no significant difference in terms of the number of excellent and good-quality embryos obtained on day 3 between both groups (p = 0.655). Embryo culture in 25 μl droplets led to more embryos with a higher cell number when compared to 7 μl culture (p = 0.024). On day 3, 132 and 131 embryos were considered for further culture until day 5/6. Blastulation rates were significantly higher in the 25 μl group (75.0 versus 61.6 %; p = 0.017) and significantly more day 5 embryos with excellent and good quality were found in this group (54.5 versus 40.5 %; p = 0.026). Finally, the utilization rates expressed per mature oocyte (41.4 versus 29.8 %; p = 0.043), per fertilized oocyte (50.7 versus 36.6 %; p = 0.023), and per day 3 embryo undergoing extended culture to day 5/6 (54.5 versus 39.7 %; p = 0.019) were all significantly higher in the 25 μl group.

Conclusion

Reduced culture volume (7 μl) negatively impacts early development by reducing the cell number on day 3 and both blastocyst formation and quality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Ahlström A, Westin C, Reismer M, Wikland M, Hardarson T. Trophectoderm morphology: an important parameter for predicting live birth after single blastocyst transfer. Hum Reprod. 2011;26(12):3289–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Alpha scientists in reproductive medicine and ESHRE special interest group of embryology. The Istanbul consensus workshop on embryo assessment: proceedings of an expert meeting. Hum Reprod. 2011;26(6):1270–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Byatt-Smith JG, Leese HJ, Gosden RG. An investigation by mathematical modelling of whether mouse and human preimplantation embryos in static culture can satisfy their demands for oxygen by diffusion. Hum Reprod. 1991;6(1):52–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. De Vos A, Van Landuyt L, Van Ranst H, Vandermonde A, D’Haese V, Sterckx J, et al. Randomized sibling-oocyte study using recombinant human hyaluronidase versus boven-derived Sigma hyaluronidase in ICSI patients. Hum Reprod. 2008;23(8):1815–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ebner T, Shebl O, Moser M, Mayer RB, Arzt W, Tews G. Group culture of human zygotes is superior to individual culture in terms of blastulation, implantation and life birth. Reprod Biomed Online. 2010;21(6):762–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Edwards LJ, Williams DA, Gardner DK. Intracellular pH of the mouse preimplantation embryo: amino acids act as buffers of intracellular pH. Hum Reprod. 1998;13(12):3441–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Edwards LJ, Williams DA, Gardner DK. Intracellular pH of the preimplantation mouse embryo: effects of extracellular pH and weak acids. Mol Reprod Dev. 1998;50(4):434–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gardner DK, Schoolcraft WB. In-vitro culture of human blastocysts. In: Jansen R, Mortimer D, editors. Towards reproductive certainty: fertility and genetics beyond 1999. Carnforth: Parthenon Press; 1999. p. 378–88.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mantikou E, Youssef MA, van Wely M, van der Veen F, Al-Inany HG, Repping S, et al. Embryo culture media and IVF/ICSI success rates: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update. 2013;19(3):210–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Minasi MG, Fabozzi G, Casciani V, Lobascio AM, Colasante A, Scarselli F, et al. Improved blastocyst formation with reduced culture volume: comparison of three different culture conditions on 1128 sibling human zygotes. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2015;32(2):215–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Morbeck DE, Paczkowski M, Fredrickson JR, Krisher RL, Hoff HS, Baumann NA, et al. Composition of protein supplements used for human embryo culture. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2014;31(12):1703–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Rebollar-Lazaro I, Matson P. The culture of human cleavage stage embryos alone or in groups: effect upon blastocyst utilization rates and implantation. Reprod Biol. 2010;10(3):227–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Restelli L, Paffoni A, Corti L, Rabellotti E, Mangiarini A, Viganò P, et al. The strategy of group embryo culture based on pronuclear pattern on blastocyst development: a two center analysis. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2014;31(12):1629–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Spyropoulou I, Karamalegos C, Bolton VN. A prospective randomized study comparing the outcome of in-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer following culture of human embryos individually or in groups before embryo transfer on day 2. Hum Reprod. 1999;14(1):76–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Stone BA, March CM, Ringler GE, Baek KJ, Marrs RP. Casting for determinants of blastocyst yield and of rates of implantation and of pregnancy after blastocyst transfers. Fertil Steril. 2014;102(4):1055–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Swain JE. Is there an optimal pH for culture media used in clinical IVF? Hum Reprod Update. 2012;18(3):333–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Thompson SM, Onwubalili N, Brown K, Jindal SK, McGovern PG. Blastocyst expansion score and trophectoderm morphology strongly predict successful clinical pregnancy and live birth following elective singe embryo blastocyst transfer (eSET). J Assist Reprod Genet. 2013;30(12):1577–81.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Vajta G, Rienzi L, Cobo A, Yovich J. Embryo culture: can we perform better than nature? Reprod Biomed Online. 2010;20(4):453–69.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Van den Abbeel E, Balaban B, Ziebe S, Lundin K, Cuesta MJ, Klein BM, et al. Association between blastocyst morphology and outcome of single-blastocyst transfer. Reprod Biomed Online. 2013;27(4):353–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Van Landuyt L, De Vos A, Joris H, Verheyen G, Devroey P, Van Steirteghem A. Blastocyst formation in in vitro fertilization versus intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles: influence of the fertilization procedure. Fertil Steril. 2005;83(5):1397–403.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Virant-Klun I, Tomazevic T, Vrtacnik-Bokal E, Vogler A, Krsnik M, Meden-Vrtovec H. Increased ammonium in culture medium reduces the development of human embryos to the blastocyst stage. Fertil Steril. 2006;85(2):526–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Rijnders PM, Jansen CA. Influence of group culture and culture volume on the formation of human blastocysts: a prospective randomized study. Hum Reprod. 1999;14(9):2333–7.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. De Munck.

Additional information

Capsule

Reducing culture volume from 25 to 7 µl significantly reduces blastocyst formation and quality.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

De Munck, N., Santos-Ribeiro, S., Mateizel, I. et al. Reduced blastocyst formation in reduced culture volume. J Assist Reprod Genet 32, 1365–1370 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-015-0541-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-015-0541-z

Keywords

Navigation