Skip to main content
Log in

Lack of carbon air filtration impacts early embryo development

  • Embryo Biology
  • Published:
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To assess human fertilization and preimplantation embryo development in the presence and in the absence of carbon filtration

Methods

This is a retrospective cohort analysis of fresh, controlled ovarian hyperstimulation cycles as well as previously cryopreserved pronuclear stage embryo transfer cycles in a single IVF center. Embryo development and cycle-based outcomes were compared among three groups: 1) when carbon filtration was present, 2) when carbon filtration was absent, and 3) when carbon filtration had been restored.

Results

A total of 524 fresh cycles and 156 cryopreserved embryo cycles were analyzed. Fertilization, cleavage, and blastocyst conversion rates for fresh cycles all declined during the period of absent carbon filtration and recovered after the restoration of carbon filtration. Cryopreserved embryos that were thawed and cultured during the period of absent filtration did not have changes in cleavage or blastocyst conversion rates compared to periods where carbon filtration was present. Clinical pregnancy and live birth rates were unchanged among the three time periods.

Conclusions

The absence of carbon filtration in an IVF laboratory air handler is associated with poor fertilization and early embryo development for fresh cycles. Because development of previously frozen pronuclear stage embryos was unaffected, the lack of carbon filtration may preferentially affect embryos in the peri-fertilization period. Carbon filtration is an integral part to a successful human in-vitro fertilization laboratory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ingebrigtsen R. Studies upon the characteristics of different culture media and their influence upon the growth of tissue outside of the organism. J Exp Med. 1912;16:421–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Whitten WK. Culture of tubal mouse ova. Nature. 1956;177:96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cohen J, Gilligan A, Esposito W, Schimmel T, Dale B. Ambient air and its potential effects on conception in vitro. Hum Reprod. 1997;12:1742–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Boone WR, Johnson JE, Locke AJ, Crane MMT, Price TM. Control of air quality in an assisted reproductive technology laboratory. Fertil Steril. 1999;71:150–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ramalho de Carvalho BASA, de Oliveira I, Barreira Gomes Sobrinho D, Miura Nakagava H, Cesar Paes Barbosa A. Laboratory air quality upgrade from ISO class 7 to ISO class 5 improves ICSI outcomes in young infertile women. JBRA Assist Reprod. 2012;16:4.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Khoudja RY, Xu Y, Li T, Zhou C. Better IVF outcomes following improvements in laboratory air quality. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2013;30:69–76.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Souza Mdo C, Mancebo AC, da Rocha CA, Henriques CA, Souza MM, Cardoso FF. Evaluation of two incubation environments–ISO class 8 versus ISO class 5–on intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycle outcome. Fertil Steril. 2009;91:1780–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Merton JS, Vermeulen ZL, Otter T, Mullaart E, de Ruigh L, Hasler JF. Carbon-activated gas filtration during in vitro culture increased pregnancy rate following transfer of in vitro-produced bovine embryos. Theriogenology. 2007;67:1233–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Perin PM, Maluf M, Czeresnia CE, Nicolosi Foltran Januario DA, Nascimento Saldiva PH. Effects of exposure to high levels of particulate air pollution during the follicular phase of the conception cycle on pregnancy outcome in couples undergoing in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. Fertil Steril. 2010;93:301–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Legro RS, Sauer MV, Mottla GL, Richter KS, Li X, Dodson WC, et al. Effect of air quality on assisted human reproduction. Hum Reprod. 2010;25:1317–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Testart J, Lassalle B, Belaisch-Allart J, Hazout A, Forman R, Rainhorn JD, et al. High pregnancy rate after early human embryo freezing. Fertil Steril. 1986;46:268–72.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gardner DK, Schoolcraft WB. In vitro culture of human blastocysts. In: Jansen R, Mortimer D, editors. Towards reproductive certainty : fertility & genetics beyond 1999. Carnforth: Parthenon Press; 1999. p. 378–88.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hreinsson J. Quality management. In: Varghese A, Sjoblom P, Jayaprakasan K, editors. A practical guide to setting up an IVF Lab, embryo culture systems and running the unit. 1st ed. New Delhi: Jaypee Brothers Medical Pub; 2013. p. 87–93.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mortimer D, Mortimer S. How are we doing? Benchmarking. In: Mortimer D, Mortimer S, editors. Quality and risk management in the IVF laboratory. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2015. p. 145–52.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gianaroli L, Plachot M, van Kooij R, Al-Hasani S, Dawson K, DeVos A, et al. ESHRE guidelines for good practice in IVF laboratories. Committee of the Special Interest Group on Embryology of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. Hum Reprod. 2000;15:2241–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Van Voorhis BJ, Thomas M, Surrey ES, Sparks A. What do consistently high-performing in vitro fertilization programs in the U.S. do? Fertil Steril. 2010;94:1346–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Cohen J, Rieger D. Historical background of gamete and embryo culture. Embryo culture: methods and protocols, vol 1. New York: Springer; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hall J, Gilligan A, Schimmel T, Cecchi M, Cohen J. The origin, effects and control of air pollution in laboratories used for human embryo culture. Hum Reprod. 1998;13 Suppl 4:146–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge Miriam Bridget Zimmerman, Clinical Professor of Biostatistics at the University of Iowa, for her assistance in the statistical analyses required for the manuscript.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hakan E. Duran.

Additional information

Capsule

The absence of carbon filtration in an IVF laboratory air handler is associated with poor fertilization andearly embryo development for fresh cycles.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Fig. 1

Cleavage Rates by Insemination Type, January–June. Cleavage rates are graphed for each January–June period from 4 years prior to, and 2 years after, the period of Absent carbon filtration. This change in cleavage rates had never been seen prior to, or since, the period of missing filtration and suggested variability not explained by minimal year-to-year changes expected in most IVF centers (XLSX 12.4 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Munch, E.M., Sparks, A.E., Duran, H.E. et al. Lack of carbon air filtration impacts early embryo development. J Assist Reprod Genet 32, 1009–1017 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-015-0495-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-015-0495-1

Keywords

Navigation