Skip to main content
Log in

Analyzing the possible involvement of anti-Müllerian hormone and anti-Müllerian hormone receptor II single nucleotide polymorphism in infertility

  • Genetics
  • Published:
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

We performed TaqMan genotyping assays of anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) and anti-Mullerian hormone receptor type II (AMHRII) single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in order to investigate how their frequency and distribution affect infertility treatment outcome.

Methods

Eighty Japanese women (advanced age: n = 51, endometriosis: n = 18, male infertility as a control: n = 11) who undertook ART were included in the study, and all couples underwent a full infertility investigation protocol. In order to investigate the natural distribution of SNPs, a naturally pregnant group of 28 subjects was recruited from among women who conceived naturally and subsequently delivered in our department. Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood and genotyping was conducted by TaqMan genotyping assay. The relationship of AMH and AMHRII SNPs and treatment outcome in infertile women. Comparison of allele and genotype frequencies of infertile patients with naturally pregnant women.

Results

AMHRII −482 A>G homozygote mutation was complicated with ISV 5–6 C>T homozygote mutation and showed a significantly lower oocyte retrieval rate compared with a wild type. Two of 3 cases of AMHRII −482 A>G homozygote mutation were poor responders, and the distribution and frequency of each allele of naturally pregnant women showed no statistical difference compared with infertile women.

Conclusions

This study revealed the possible involvement of AMHRII −482 A>G polymorphism on the malfunction of follicular development in Japanese women.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. van Rooij IA, Broekmans FJ, Scheffer GJ, Looman CW, Habbema JD, de Jong FH, et al. Serum antimullerian hormone levels best reflect the reproductive decline with age in normal women with proven fertility: a longitudinal study. Fertil Steril. 2005;83:979–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Peñarrubia J, Fábregues F, Manau D, Creus M, Casals G, Casamitjana R, et al. Basal and stimulation day 5 anti-Mullerian hormone serum concentrations as predictors of ovarian response and pregnancy in assisted reproductive technology cycles stimulated with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist—gonadotropin treatmen. Hum Reprod. 2005;20:915–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Nakhuda GS, Chu MC, Wang JG, Sauer MV, Lobo RA. Elevated serum müllerian-inhibiting substance may be a marker for ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in normal women undergoing in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 2006;85:1541–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. La Marca A, Giulini S, Tirelli A, Bertucci E, Marsella T, Xella S, et al. Anti-Müllerian hormone measurement on any day of the menstrual cycle strongly predicts ovarian response in assisted reproductive technology. Hum Reprod. 2007;22:766–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Nelson SM, Yates RW, Fleming R. Serum anti-Müllerian hormone and FSH: prediction of live birth and extremes of response in stimulated cycles–implications for individualization of therapy. Hum Reprod. 2007;22:2414–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Schuh-Huerta SM, Johnson NA, Rosen MP, Sternfeld B, Cedars MI, Reijo Pera RA. Genetic variants and environmental factors associated with hormonal markers of ovarian reserve in Caucasian and African American women. Hum Reprod. 2012;27:594–608.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Karita M, Yamashita Y, Hayashi A, Yoshida Y, Hayashi M, Yamamoto H, et al. Influence of severe endometriosis on gene expression of progesterone receptor in granulosa cells in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer. Fertil Steril. 2011;95:889–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. di Clemente N, Josso N, Gouédard L, Belville C. Components of the anti-Müllerian hormone signaling pathway in gonads. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2003;211:9–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Visser JA, Olaso R, Verhoef-Post M, Kramer P, Themmen AP, Ingraham HA. The serine/threonine transmembrane receptor ALK2 mediates Müllerian inhibiting substance signaling. Mol Endocrinol. 2001;15:936–45.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Visser JA, Themmen AP. Anti-Müllerian hormone and folliculogenesis. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2005;234:81–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Weenen C, Laven JS, Von Bergh AR, Cranfield M, Groome NP, Visser JA, et al. Anti-Müllerian hormone expression pattern in the human ovary: potential implications for initial and cyclic follicle recruitment. Mol Hum Reprod. 2004;10:77–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Durlinger AL, Gruijters MJ, Kramer P, Karels B, Kumar TR, Matzuk MM, et al. Anti-Müllerian hormone attenuates the effects of FSH on follicle development in the mouse ovary. Endocrinology. 2001;142:4891–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kevenaar ME, Thermmen APN, Rivadeneria F, Uitterlinden AG, Laven JSE, van Schoor NM, et al. A polymorphism in the AMH type II receptor gene is associated with age at menopause in interaction with parity. Hum Reprod. 2007;22:2382–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Grootegoed JA, Baarends WM, Themmen AP. Welcome to the family: the anti-müllerian hormone receptor. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 1994;100:29–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Josso N, Rey R, Picard JY. Testicular anti-Müllerian hormone: clinical applications in DSD. Semin Reprod Med. 2012;5:364–73.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kevenaar ME, Themmen AP, Laven JS, Sonntag B, Fong SL, Uitterlinden AG, et al. Anti-Müllerian hormone and anti-Müllerian hormone type II receptor polymorphisms are associated with follicular phase estradiol levels in normo-ovulatory women. Hum Reprod. 2007;22:1547–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Fauser BC, Van Heusden AM. Manipulation of human ovarian function: physiological concepts and clinical consequences. Endocr Rev. 1997;18(1):71–106.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Mulders AG, Laven JS, Imani B, Eijkemans MJ, Fauser BC. IVF outcome in anovulatory infertility (WHO group 2)–including polycystic ovary syndrome–following previous unsuccessful ovulation induction. Reprod Biomed Online. 2003;7:50–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Schug J, Overton GC. Modeling transcription factor binding sites with Gibbs Sampling and Minimum Description Length encoding. Proc Int Conf Intell Syst Mol Biol. 1997;5:2.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yoshiki Yamashita.

Additional information

Capsule

AMHRII -482A>G polymorphism may have the potential to cause a malfunction in follicular development

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yoshida, Y., Yamashita, Y., Saito, N. et al. Analyzing the possible involvement of anti-Müllerian hormone and anti-Müllerian hormone receptor II single nucleotide polymorphism in infertility. J Assist Reprod Genet 31, 163–168 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-013-0134-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-013-0134-7

Keywords

Navigation