Advertisement

Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics

, Volume 30, Issue 11, pp 1415–1419 | Cite as

Case report: the use of annexin V coupled with magnetic activated cell sorting in cryopreserved spermatozoa from a male cancer survivor: healthy twin newborns after two previous ICSI failures

  • María Belén Herrero
  • Géraldine Delbes
  • Jin-Tae Chung
  • Weon-Young Son
  • Hananel Holzer
  • William Buckett
  • Peter ChanEmail author
Fertility Preservation

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of the study is to report successful outcome (live births) after sperm sorting with annexin V-MACS on cryopreserved spermatozoa with high level of sperm DNA fragmentation from a cancer patient survivor.

Methods

Cryopreserved spermatozoa were sorted with annexin V-MACS prior to ICSI. Sperm DNA fragmentation was evaluated by SCSA® and TUNEL.

Results

The couple had two previous IVF/ICSI cycles failures using sperm cryopreserved before cancer treatment. On third ICSI cycle attempt results were as follow: pre-annexin V-MACS sperm quality: 10 × 106/ml, 3.3 % progressive motility, 1 % normal forms, TUNEL: 72.5 % positive cells, SCSA®: 76.6 % DFI. Post-annexin V-MACS sperm quality: 2.8 × 106/ml, 10 % progressive motility, TUNEL: 58.8 % positive cells. Eight metaphase II oocytes were collected, 4 fertilized, 2 embryos were transferred on day 3 and healthy twins were born (1 boy, 1 girl).

Conclusions

Annexin V-MACS technique could be a potential tool to improve sperm quality on cryopreserved spermatozoa of cancer patient and improve ICSI outcome.

Keywords

Cancer survivor Cryopreserved sperm Annexin V-MACS 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Lorraine Lavigne, R.N., for co-ordination of all clinical visits with the couple and to the Centro de Estudios en Ginecología y Reproducción (CEGYR, Argentina), for sharing their knowledge on MACS columns. The study was supported by CIHR grants SUR-103395, MOP-86636 to PC.

References

  1. 1.
    Ahmad L, Jalali S, Shami SA, Akram Z, Batool S, Kalsoom O. Effects of cryopreservation on sperm DNA integrity in normospermic and four categories of infertile males. Syst Biol Reprod Med. 2010;56:74–83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Avendaño C, Franchi A, Duran H, Oehninger S. DNA fragmentation of normal spermatozoa negatively impacts embryo quality and intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcome. Fertil Steril. 2010;94:549–57.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bungum M, Humaidan P, Axmon A, Spano M, Bungum L, et al. Sperm DNA integrity assessment in prediction of assisted reproduction technology outcome. Hum Reprod. 2007;22:174–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Carrell DT, Liu L, Peterson CM, Jones KP, Hatasaka HH, Erickson L, et al. Sperm DNA fragmentation is increased in couples with unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss. Arch Androl. 2003;49:49–55.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chan PT, Palermo GD, Veeck LL, Rosenwaks Z, Schlegel PN. Testicular sperm extraction combined with intracytoplasmic sperm injection in the treatment of men with persistent azoospermia postchemotherapy. Cancer. 2001;92:1632–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chohan KR, Griffin JT, Lafromboise M, De Jonge C, Carrell DT. Comparison of chromatin assays for DNA fragmentation evaluation in human sperm. J Androl. 2006;27:53–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Delbes G, Herrero MB, Troeung et, Chan PTK (2013) The use of complimentary assays to evaluate the enrichment of human sperm quality in asthenoteratozoospermic and teratozoospermic samples processed with Annexin-V magnetic activated cell sorting. Andrology 2013;1:698–706.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Donnelly ET, McClure N, Lewis SEM. Cryopreservation of human semen and prepared sperm: effects on motility parameters and DNA integrity. Fertil Steril. 2001;76:892–900.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Evenson DP, Larson KL, Jost LK. Sperm chromatin structure assay: its clinical use for detecting sperm DNA fragmentation in male infertility and comparisons with other techniques. J Androl. 2002;23:25–43.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fu J, Wang XJ, Wang YW, Sun J, Gemzell-Danielsson K, Sun XX. The influence of early cleavage on embryo developmental potential and IVF/ICSI outcome. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2009;26:437–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gandini L, Lombardo F, Paoli D, Euleteri P, Leter G, et al. Full term pregnancies achieved with ICSI despite high levels of sperm chromatin damage. Hum Reprod. 2004;19:1409–17.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gardino SL, Jeruss JS, Woodruff TK. Using decision trees to enhance interdisciplinary team work: the case of oncofertility. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2010;27:227–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Grunewald S, Reinhardt M, Blumenauer V, Said TM, Agarwal A, Abu Hmeidan F, et al. Increased sperm chromatin decondensation in selected nonapoptotic spermatozoa of patients with male infertility. Fertil Steril. 2009;92:572–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hoogendijk CF, Kruger TF, Bouic PJ, Henkel RR. A novel approach for the selection of human sperm using annexin V-binding and flow cytometry. Fertil Steril. 2009;91:1285–92.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Host E, Lindenberg S, Smidt-Jensen S. DNA strand breaks in human spermatozoa: correlation with fertilization in vitro in oligozoospermic men and in men with unexplained infertility. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2000;79:189–93.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lundin K, Bergh C, Hardarson T. Early embryo cleavage is a strong indicator of embryo quality in human IVF. Hum Reprod. 2001;16:2652–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    O’Flaherty C, Vaisheva F, Hales BF, Chan P, Robaire B. Characterization of sperm chromatin quality in testicular cancer and Hodgkin’s lymphoma patients prior to chemotherapy. Hum Reprod. 2008;23:1044–52.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Palermo G, Munne S, Cohen J. The human zygote inherits its mitotic potential from the male gamete. Hum Reprod. 1994;9:1220–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Polak E, Denaday F. Single and twin ongoing pregnancies in two cases of previous ART failure after ICSI performed with sperm sorted using annexin V microbeads. Fertil Steril. 2010;94:351.e16–8.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rawe VY, Uriondo Boudri H, Alvarez Sedo C, Carro M, Papier S, Nodar F. Healthy baby born after reduction of sperm DNA fragmentation using cell sorting before ICSI. Reprod Biomed Online. 2010;20:320–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Roth BJ, Krilov L, Adams S, Aghajanian CA, Bach P, Braiteh F, et al. Clinical cancer advances 2012: annual report on progress against cancer from the American Society of Clinical Oncology. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:131–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Said TM, Agarwal A, Grunewald S, Rasch M, Glander HJ, Paasch U. Evaluation of sperm recovery following annexin V magnetic-activated cell sorting separation. Reprod Biomed Online. 2006;13:336–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Said TM, Agarwal A, Zborowski M, Grunewald S, Glander HJ, Paasch U. Utility of magnetic cell separation as a molecular sperm preparation technique. J Androl. 2008;29:134–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sakkas D. The use of blastocyst culture to avoid inheritance of an abnormal paternal genome after ICSI. Hum Reprod. 1999;14:4–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sakkas D, D’Arcy Y, Percival G, Sinclair L, Afnan M, Sharif K. Use of the egg-share model to investigate the paternal influence on fertilization and embryo development after in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Fertil Steril. 2004;82:74–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sakkas D, Seli E, Manicardi GC, Nijs M, Ombelet W, Bizzaro D. The presence of abnormal spermatozoa in the ejaculate: did apoptosis fail? Hum Fertil (Camb). 2004;7:99–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Sharma R, Masaki J, Agarwal A. Sperm DNA fragmentation analysis using the TUNEL assay. Methods Mol Biol. 2013;927:121–36.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Shoukir Y, Campana Y, Farley T, Sakkas D. Early cleavage of in-vitro fertilized human embryos to the 2-cell stage: a novel indicator of embryo quality and viability. Hum Reprod. 1997;12:1531–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Sun JG, Jurisicova A, Casper RF. Detection of deoxyribonucleic acid fragmentation in human sperm: correlation with fertilization in vitro. Biol Reprod. 1997;56:602–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Taylor DM, Ray PF, Ao A, Winston RM, Handyside AH. Paternal transcripts for glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase and adenosine deaminase are first detectable in the human pre-implantation embryo at the three- to four-cell stage. Mol Reprod Dev. 1997;48:442–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Vermes I, Haanen C, Steffens-Nakken H, Reutelingsperger C. A novel assay for apoptosis. Flow cytometric detection of phosphatidylserine expression on early apoptotic cells using fluorescein labelled Annexin V. J Immunol Methods. 1995;184:39–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    World Health Organization. World Health Organization WHO laboratory manual for examination and processing of human semen. 5th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Zini A, Meriano J, Kader K, Jarvi K, Larskin C, Cadesky K. Potential adverse effect of sperm DNA damage on embryo quality after ICSI. Hum Reprod. 2005;20:3476–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Zini A, Boman JM, Belzile E, Ciampi A. Sperm DNA damage is associated with an increased risk of pregnancy lass after IVF and ICSI: systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod. 2008;23:2663–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Zini A, Jamal W, Cowan L, Al-Hathal N. Is sperm DNA damage associated with IVF embryo quality? A systematic review. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2011;28:391–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • María Belén Herrero
    • 1
  • Géraldine Delbes
    • 2
  • Jin-Tae Chung
    • 1
  • Weon-Young Son
    • 1
  • Hananel Holzer
    • 1
  • William Buckett
    • 1
  • Peter Chan
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.MUHC Reproductive CenterMcGill University Health CenterMontrealCanada
  2. 2.The Urology Research DepartmentMcGill University Health CenterMontrealCanada
  3. 3.The Department of UrologyMcGill University Health Center Royal Victoria HospitalMontréalCanada

Personalised recommendations