Skip to main content
Log in

Depression in Chinese men undergoing different assisted reproductive technique treatments: prevalence and risk factors

  • ASSISTED REPRODUCTION TECHNOLOGIES
  • Published:
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To explore the prevalence and risk factors for depression in men undergoing different assisted reproductive technique (ART) treatments in Chinese population.

Method

This was a prospective study of 844 men undergoing ART treatments. All men were distributed to four groups, according to they received treatments. The treatments included IUI (intrauterine insemination), IVF(in vitro fertilization), ICSI(intra cytoplasmatic sperm injection) and TESA/PESA (percutaneous epididymal sperm aspiration/testicular sperm aspiration). Their symptoms of depression were measured with use of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies of Depression scale(CES-D). Data were collected about age, BMI, education, duration of marriage, duration of infertility, smoking, type of infertility, infertility causes, history of ejaculation failure, and financial burden of the treatment. We estimated the prevalence of depressive symptom in men undergoing different ART and used logistic regression models to identify risk factors for depression in different groups.

Results

The overall prevalence of depression was 13.3 % for men undergoing ART treatments: 14.5 % of IUI group, 12.4 % of IVF group, 19.2 % of ICSI group and 6.2 % of TESA/PESA group. Prevalence of depression among IUI group, IVF group and ICSI group were not significantly different. For IUI group, the factors were found to increase depression risk were treatment financial burden and duration of marriage, to decrease depression risk was age. For IVF group, the risk factors independently associated with depression were both male and female infertility, unexplained infertility, and history of ejaculation failure.

Conclusion

In a sample of Chinese men undergoing ART treatments, the prevalence of depression was higher than other country. The risk factors for depression varied in different ART treatments groups. when routine screening to identify the sub-group of vulnerable men which need counselling before ART treatments, we should also consider which pattern of ART treatments the man underwent.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Verhaak CM, Smeenk JMJ, Evers AWM, van Minnen A, Kremer JA, Kraaimaat FW. Predicting emotional response to unsuccessful fertility treatment: a prospective study. J Behav Med. 2005;28:181–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Brennan DP, Christopher RN, Tal F. Anxiety and sexual stress in men and women undergoing infertility treatment. Fertil Steril. 2007;88:911–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Christina LW, Shawna LE, Scott EW, Amy LW, Charles C. Comparison of multiple psychological distress measures between men and women preparing for in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 2011;95:717–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Eugster A, Vingerhoets AJ. Psychological aspects of in vitro fertilization: a review. Soc Sci Med. 1999;48(5):575–89.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Clarke RN, Klock SC, Geoghegan A, Travassos DE. Relationship between psychological stress and semen quality among in-vitro fertilization patients. Hum Reprod. 1999;14:753–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Campagne DM. Should fertilization treatment start with reducing stress? Hum Reprod. 2006;21(7):1651–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Newton CR, Hearn MT, Yuzpe AA. Psychological assessment and follow-up after in vitro fertilization:assessing the impact of failure. Fertil Steril. 1990;54:879–86.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Francesca C, Maria PB, Claudia S, Francesca B, Stefania A, Cristiana D, et al. Prevalence and incidence of depressive and anxious symptoms in couples undergoing assisted reproductive treatment in an Italian infertility department. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011;158:235–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Volgsten H, Skoog SA, Ekselius L, Lundkvist O, Sundstrom P. Prevalence of psychiatric disorders in infertile women and men undergoing in vitro fertilization treatment. Hum Reprod. 2008;20:2253–60.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Myers J, Weissman M. Use of a self-report symptom scale to detect depression in a community sample. Am J Psychiatry. 1980;137:1081–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Radloff L. The CES-D scale: a self-report depression scale for research for research n the general population. Appl Psychol Meas. 1977;1:385–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gaynes B, Gavin N, Meltzer-Brody S, Lohr K, Swinson T., Gartlehner G et al. Perinatal depression: prevalence, screening, accuracy, and screening outcomes. Evidence Report/Technology Assesment 119-AHRQ Publication No. 05-E006-2. 2005.

  13. Anjel V, Yolanda RS, Michelle D, Heather AF. Longitudinal depressive symptoms and state anxiety among women using assisted reproductive technology. Fertil Steril. 2011;95:1192–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Weissman MM, Sholomskas D, Pottenger M, Prusoff BA, Locke BZ. Assessing depressive symptoms in five psychiatric populations: a validation study. Am J Epidemiol. 1977;106:203–14.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Sutter-Dallay AL, Cosnefroy O, Glatigny-Dallay E, Verdoux H, Rascle N. Evolution of perinatal depressive symptoms from pregnancy to two years postpartum in a low-risk sample: The MATQUID cohort. J Affect Disord. 2012;139:23–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Radloff LS. The CES-D scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psychol Meas. 1977;1:385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Radloff LS. The use of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale in adolescents and young adults. J Youth Adolesc. 1991;20:149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Roberts RE. Reliability of the CES-D Scale in different ethnic contexts. Psychiatry Res. 1980;2:125.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Leonore DW, Floriana L, Annemieke VS, Brenda P, Frans Z, Pim C. Depression and obesity: a meta-analysis of community-based studies. Psychiatry Res. 2010;178:230–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Rohde P, Lewinsohn PM, Brown RA, Gau JM, Kahler CM. Psychiatric disorders, familial factors and cigarette smoking: I. Associations with smoking initiation. Nicotine Tob Res. 2003;5(1):85–98.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Katrin B, Wolfgang M, Bedirhan Üstün T, Michael G, Hans-Ulrich W, Reinhard H. Risk factors for depression at 12-month follow-up in adult primary health care patients with major depression: an international prospective study. J Affect Disord. 2003;76:157–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ansseau M, Fishler B, Dierick M, Albert A, Leyman S, Mignon A. Socioeconomic correlates of generalized anxiety disorder and major depression in primary care: the GADIS II study (Generalized Anxiety and Depression Impact Survey II). Depress Anxiety. 2008;25:506–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Helena V, Agneta SY, Lisa E, Orjan L, Inger SP. Risk factors for psychiatric disorders in infertile women and men undergoing in vitro fertilization treatment. Fertil Steril. 2010;93:1088–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Chen TH, Chang SP, Tsai CF, Juang KD. Prevalence of depressive and anxiety disorders in an assisted reproductive technique clinic. Hum Reprod. 2004;19:2313–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Copeland JR, Beekman AT, Dewey ME, Jordan A, Lawlor BA, Linde M, et al. Cross-cultural comparison of depressive symptoms in Europe does not support stereotypes of ageing. Br J Psychiatry. 1999;174:322–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Salokangas RKR, Poutanen O. Risk factors for depression in primary care. Findings of the TADEP project. J Affect Disord. 1998;48:171–80.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Roberts RE, Kaplan GA, Shema SJ, Strawbridge WJ. Prevalence and correlates of depression in an aging cohort: the Almeda County Study. J Gerontol. 1997;52b(5):252–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kennedy GJ, Kelman HR, Thomas C, Wisniewski W, Metz H, Bijur PE. Hierarchy of characteristics associated with depressive symptoms in an urban elderly sample. Am J Psychiatry. 1989;146(2):220–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Ahmad AN, Fatemeh R, Hossein M, Nasrin A, Abbas RF, Mamak S, et al. Effects of a psychological intervention on depression in infertile couples. Int j Gynecol Obstet. 2008;101:248–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Beutel M, Kupfer J, Kirchmeyer P, et al. Treatment related stresses and depression in couples undergoing assisted reproductive treatment by IVF or ICSI. Andrologia. 1998;31:27–35.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Beekman AT, Kriegsman DM, Deeg DJ, Van Tilburg W. Association of physical health and depressive symptoms in the older population: age and sex differences. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 1995;30:32–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Nicolosi GT, Falcão DV, Batistoni SS, Lopes A, Cachioni M, Neri AL, et al. Depressive symptoms in old age: relations among sociodemographic and self-reported health variables. Int Psychogeriatr. 2011;13:1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Kolchakova PY, Akabaliev VH. A study of the effect of age on depressivity in Bulgarian urban population. Folia Med (Plovdiv). 2003;45:11–5.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Aluoja A, Leinsalu M, Shlik J, Vasar V, Luuk K. Symptoms of depression in the Estonian population: prevalence, sociodemographic correlates and social adjustment. J Affect Disord. 2004;78:27–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Kleinberg A, Aluoja A, Vasar V. Point prevalence of major depression in Estonia. Results from the 2006 Estonian Health Survey. Eur Psychiatr. 2010;25:485–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Christopher RN, Wendy S, Irene G. The Fertility Problem Inventory: measuring perceived infertility-related stress. Fertil Steril. 1999;72:54–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Anna AD, Heather S, Derrick G, Linda N, Urania M, Trace K. Depression during pregnancy among young couples: the effect of personal and partner experiences of stressors and the buffering effects of social relationships. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2012;25:201–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Emery M, Senn A, Wisard M, Germond M. Ejaculation failure on the day of oocyte retrieval for IVF:Case report. Hum Reprod. 2004;19(9):2088–90.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Zhang J, Wu ZY, Fang G, Juan L, BuXin H, ZhiYa C. Development of the Chinese age norms of CES-D in urban area. Chin Ment Heal J. 2010;24:139–43.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Beeghly M, Weinberg MK, Olson KL, Kernan H, Riley J, Tronick EZ. Stability and change in level of maternal depressive symptomatology during the first postpartum year. J Affect Disord. 2002;71:169–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Fihrer I, Mc MC, Taylor A. The impact of postnatal and concurrent maternal depression on child behaviour during the early school years. J Affect Disord. 2009;119:116–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Horwitz SM, Briggs-Gowan MJ, Storfer-Isser A, Carter AS. Prevalence, correlates, and persistence of maternal depression. J women’s health. 2007;16:678–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuanzhen Zhang.

Additional information

Capsule The prevalence of depression for Chinese men undergoing ART treatments was higher than other countries. Risk factors for male depression varied among different ART treatments.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Li, L., Zhang, Y., Zeng, D. et al. Depression in Chinese men undergoing different assisted reproductive technique treatments: prevalence and risk factors. J Assist Reprod Genet 30, 1161–1167 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-013-0057-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-013-0057-3

Keywords

Navigation