Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Effect of cumulus cell removal 4 h post-insemination on fertilization and embryo quality: a prospective randomized sibling-oocyte study

  • ASSISTED REPRODUCTION TECHNOLOGIES
  • Published:
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The study was designed to evaluate whether cumulus cell removal 4 h post-insemination could influence fertilization and embryo quality.

Methods

The study included 61couples undergoing standard long down regulation protocol from July 2011 to May 2012. Sibling oocytes of each patient were randomly assigned to either the 4 h group or the 20 group. For the 4 h group, cumulus cells were removed 4 h after gamete coincubation; for the 20 group, cumulus cells removal was performed 20 h after insemination. Fertilization rate, embryo quality, pregnancy rate and implantation rate were assessed.

Results

A total of 801 sibling cumulus-oocyte complexes (COCs) were randomized to the 4 h group (421 COCs) or 20 h group (380 COCs). There was no difference in the two pronuclei, one pronucleus and grade 1–2 embryo rate. Three pronuclei rate was significantly higher in the 4 h group compared to the 20 h group (12.6 % vs. 8.2 %, P = 0.041). Comparison of embryo transfer cycles in which either embryos from the 4 h group or 20 h group were transferred did not reveal any statistically significant differences in pregnancy or implantation rates.

Conclusion

The results of the present study indicate that cumulus cell removal 4 h post-insemination may increase the percentage of tripronuclear zygotes. However, normal fertilization rate, embryo development, clinical pregnancy rate and implantation rates are not influenced by the timing of cumulus cell removal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chen C, Kattera S. Rescue ICSI of oocytes that failed to extrude the second polar body 6 h post-insemination in conventional IVF. Hum Reprod. 2003;18:2118–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Feng H, Hershlag A. Fertilization abnormalities following human in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Microsc Res Tech. 2003;61:358–61.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ho JY, Chen MJ, Yi YC, Guu HF, Ho ES. The effect of preincubation period of oocytes on nuclear maturity, fertilization rate, embryo quality, and pregnancy outcome in IVF and ICSI. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2003;20:358–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Isiklar A, Mercan R, Balaban B, Alatas C, Aksoy S, Urman B. Impact of oocyte pre-incubation time on fertilization, embryo quality and pregnancy rate after intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Reprod Biomed Online. 2004;8:682–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kuczynski W, Dhont M, Grygoruk C, Pietrewicz P, Redzko S, Szamatowicz M. Rescue ICSI of unfertilized oocytes after IVF. Hum Reprod. 2002;17:2423–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lundin K, Sjogren A, Hamberger L. Reinsemination of one-day-old oocytes by use of intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Fertil Steril. 1996;66:118–21.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Macklon NS, Stouffer RL, Giudice LC, Fauser BC. The science behind 25 years of ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization. Endocr Rev. 2006;27:170–207.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ming L, Liu P, Qiao J, Lian Y, Zheng X, Ren X, et al. Synchronization between embryo development and endometrium is a contributing factor for rescue ICSI outcome. Reprod Biomed Online. 2012;24:527–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Morton PC, Yoder CS, Tucker MJ, Wright G, Brockman WD, Kort HI. Reinsemination by intracytoplasmic sperm injection of 1-day-old oocytes after complete conventional fertilization failure. Fertil Steril. 1997;68:488–91.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Nagy ZP, Rienzi LF, Ubaldi FM, Greco E, Massey JB, Kort HI. Effect of reduced oocyte aging on the outcome of rescue intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Fertil Steril. 2006;85:901–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Park KS, Song HB, Chun SS. Late fertilization of unfertilized human oocytes in in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles: conventional insemination versus ICSI. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2000;17:419–24.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Pehlivan T, Rubio C, Ruiz A, Navarro J, Remohi J, Pellicer A, et al. Embryonic chromosomal abnormalities obtained after rescue intracytoplasmic sperm injection of 1-day-old unfertilized oocytes. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2004;21:55–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Shalom-paz E, Alshalati J, Shehata F, Jimenez L, Son WY, Holzer H, et al. Clinical and economic analysis of rescue intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2011;27:993–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Shveiky D, Simon A, Gino H, Safran A, Lewin A, Reubinoff B, et al. Sibling oocyte submission to IVF and ICSI in unexplained infertility patients: a potential assay for gamete quality. Reprod Biomed Online. 2006;12:371–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Tsirigotis M, Redgment C, Craft I. Late intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) in in-vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles. Hum Reprod. 1994;9:1359.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Tsirigotis M, Nicholson N, Taranissi M, Bennett V, Pelekanos M, Craft I. Late intracytoplasmic sperm injection in unexpected failed fertilization in vitro: diagnostic or therapeutic? Fertil Steril. 1995;63:816–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. van der Westerlaken L, Helmerhorst F, Dieben S, Naaktgeboren N. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection as a treatment for unexplained total fertilization failure or low fertilization after conventional in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 2005;83:612–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Van de Velde H, De Vos A, Joris H, Nagy ZP, Van Steirteghem AC. Effect of timing of oocyte denudation and micro-injection on survival, fertilization and embryo quality after intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod. 1998;13:3160–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Wei D, Zhang C, Yin B, Wang P, Xie J, Song X, et al. Early cumulus cell removal could reduce the available embryo rate in human IVF. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2011;28:1213–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. World Health Organization. WHO laboratory manual for the examination of human semen and semen–cervical mucus interaction. 4th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Xiong S, Han W, Liu JX, Zhang XD, Liu WW, Liu H, et al. Effects of cumulus cells removal after 6 h co-incubation of gametes on the outcomes of human IVF. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2011;28:1205–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Reproductive Medicine Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, No. 3, Qingchun Road, Hangzhou, 310016, China

    Yamei Xue, Xiaomei Tong, Lingying Jiang, Haiyan Zhu, Lingyun Yang & Songying Zhang

Authors
  1. Yamei Xue
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xiaomei Tong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Lingying Jiang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Haiyan Zhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Lingyun Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Songying Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Songying Zhang.

Additional information

Capsule

Cumulus cells removal 4 h post-insemination may increase the percentage of tripronuclear zygotes and does not influence normal fertilization rate, embryo development, clinical pregnancy and implantation rates.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Xue, Y., Tong, X., Jiang, L. et al. Effect of cumulus cell removal 4 h post-insemination on fertilization and embryo quality: a prospective randomized sibling-oocyte study. J Assist Reprod Genet 30, 1049–1053 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-013-0049-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-013-0049-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation