Abstract
Purpose
Closed-system vitrification may enable the risk of contamination to be minimised. We performed three studies to compare the developmental competence of human embryos vitrified using either a closed vitrification system (CVS; Rapid-i®) or an open vitrification system (OVS; Cryo-top®).
Methods
The first study was performed in vitro using 66 zygotes previously vitrified at pronuclear stage. These were warmed and randomised 1:1 to revitrification using either the OVS or the CVS. After re-warming, embryo development and blastocyst cell number were assessed. For the second study, also performed in vitro, 60 vitrified–warmed blastocysts were randomised 1:1:1 into three groups (OVS or CVS revitrification, or no revitrification). The proportion of dead cells was assessed by staining. The third study was performed in vivo, using 263 high-grade blastocysts randomly assigned to vitrification using either the CVS (n = 100) or the OVS (n = 163). After warming, single blastocyst transfer was performed.
Results
There were no differences between the CVS and the OVS in survival rate (100 % vs. 97 %), blastulation rate (96 h: 50 % vs. 50 %; 120 h: 68 % vs. 56 %), proportion of good blastocysts (96 h: 32 % vs. 22 %, 120 h: 47 % vs. 41 %), or mean number of cells (137 vs. 138). The proportion of dead cells in blastocysts re-vitrified by CVS (31 %) was similar to that for OVS (38 %) and non-revitrification (32 %). In vivo, the implantation rate for blastocysts vitrified using the CVS (54 %) was similar to that with the OVS (53 %).
Conclusion
Our studies consistently indicate that human embryos may be vitrified using a CVS without impairment of developmental competence.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
AbdelHafez F, Xu J, Goldberg J, Desai N. Vitrification in open and closed carriers at different cell stages: assessment of embryo survival, development, DNA integrity and stability during vapor phase storage for transport. BMC Biotechnol. 2011;11:29.
Bielanski A. The potential for animal and human germplasm contamination through assisted reproductive technologies. Trends Reprod Biol. 2006;2:13–36.
Bielanski A, Vajta G. Risk of contamination of germplasm during cryopreservation and cryobanking in IVF units. Hum Reprod. 2009;24:2457–67.
de Mouzon J, Goossens V, Bhattacharya S, Castilla JA, Ferraretti AP, Korsak V, Kupka M, Nygren KG, Andersen AN, European IVF-Monitoring (EIM); Consortium for the European Society on Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE). Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2007: results generated from European registers by ESHRE. Hum Repro. 2012;27:954–66.
De Munck N, Verheyen G, Stoop D, Van Landuyt L, Van de Velde H. Survival and post-warming in vitro competence of human oocytes after high-security closed system vitrification. Hum Reprod. 2012;27:i72–3.
Desai N, Goldberg J, Austin C, Falcone T. The new Rapid i carrier is an effective closed system for human embryo vitrification at both the blastocyst and cleavage stage. Hum Reprod. 2012;27:i60.
Edgar DH, Gook DA. A critical appraisal of cryopreservation (slow cooling versus vitrification) of human oocytes and embryos. Hum Reprod Update. 2012;18:536–54.
Gardner DK, Lane M. Culture and selection of viable human blastocysts: a feasible proposition for human IVF. Hum Reprod Update. 1997;3:367–82.
Hashimoto S, Murata Y, Kikkawa M, Sonoda M, Oku H, Murata T, Sugihara K, Nagata F, Nakaoka Y, Fukuda A, Morimoto Y. Successful delivery after the transfer of twice-vitrified embryos derived from in vitro matured oocytes: a case report. Hum Reprod. 2007;22:221–3.
Hashimoto S, Kato N, Saeki K, Morimoto Y. Selection of high potential embryos by culture in poly-(dimethylsiloxane) microwells and time-lapse imaging. Fertil Steril. 2012;97:332–7.
Huang JY, Chen HY, Tan SL, Chian RC. Effect of choline-supplemented sodium-depleted slow freezing versus vitrification on mouse oocyte meiotic spindles and chromosome abnormalities. Fertil Steril. 2007;88:1093–100.
Isachenko V, Montag M, Isachenko E, Zaeva V, Krivokharchenko I, Shafei R, van der Ven H. Aseptic technology of vitrification of human pronuclear oocytes using open-pulled straws. Hum Reprod. 2005;20:492–6.
Isachenko V, Katkov II, Yakovenko S, Lulat AG, Ulug M, Arvas A, Isachenko E. Vitrification of human laser treated blastocysts within cut standard straws (CSS): novel aseptic packaging and reduced concentrations of cryoprotectants. Cryobiology. 2007;54:305–9.
Kuwayama M, Vajta G, Leda S, Kato O. Comparison of open and closed methods for vitrification of human embryos and the elimination of potential contamination. Reprod Biomed Online. 2005;11:608–14.
Lane M, Gardner DK. Vitrification of mouse oocytes using a nylon loop. Mol Reprod Dev. 2001;58:342–7.
Larman M, Gardner D. Vitrification of mouse embryos with super-cooled air. Fertil Steril. 2011;95:1462–6.
Liebermann J, Tucker MJ. Effect of carrier system on the yield of human oocytes and embryos as assessed by survival and developmental potential after vitrification. Reproduction. 2002;124:483–9.
Loutradi KE, Kolibianakis EM, Venetis CA, Papanikolaou EG, Pados G, Bontis I, Tarlatzis BC. Cryopreservation of human embryos by vitrification or slow freezing: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Fertil Steril. 2008;90:186–93.
Martinez-Burgos M, Herrero L, Megias D, Salvanes R, Montoya MC, Cobo AC, Garcia-Velasco JA. Vitrification versus slow freezing of oocytes: effects on morphologic appearance, meiotic spindle configuration, and DNA damage. Fertil Steril. 2011;95:374–7.
Mazur P, Cole KW, Hall WH, Schreuders PD, Mahowald AP. Cryobiological preservation of Drosophila embryos. Science. 1992;258:1932–5.
Nagy NP, Vajta G, Chiang CC, Kort H. The human embryo: vitrification. In: Gardner DK, Weissman A, Howels CM, Shoham Z, editors. Textbook of assisted reproducttive technologies. 3rd ed. London: Infroma Healthcare; 2009. p. 275–88.
Nedambale TL, Dinnyes A, Groen W, Dobrinsky JR, Tian XC, Yang X. Comparison on in vitro fertilized bovine embryos cultured in KSOM or SOF and cryopreserved by slow freezing or vitrification. Theriogenology. 2004;62:437–49.
Panagiotidis Y, Kasapi E, Goudakou M, Papatheodorou A, Pasadaki T, Petousis S, Nikolettos N, Maroulis G, Vanderzwalmen P, Prapas Y. Open vs. closed vitrification system for the cryopreservation of human blastocysts: a prospective randomized study. Hum Reprod. 2012;27:i59–60.
Papatheodourou A, Vanderzwalmen P, Panagiotidis Y, Kasapi L, Goudakou M, Pasadaki T, Prapas N, Prapas Y. Open versus closed oocyte vitrification system: a prospective randomized sibling-oocyte study. Hum Reprod. 2012;27:i72.
Rall W, Fahy G. Ice-free cryopreservation of mouse embryos at -196 °C by vitrification. Nature. 1985;313:573–375.
Rall WF. Factors affecting the survival of mouse embryos cryopreserved by vitrification. Cryobiology. 1987;24:387–402.
Rehman KS, Bukulmez O, Langley M, Carr BR, Nackley AC, Doody KM, Doody KJ. Late stages of embryo progression are a much better predictor of clinical pregnancy than early cleavage in intracytoplasmic sperm injection and in vitro fertilization cycles with blastocyst-stage transfer. Fertil Steril. 2007;87:1041–52.
Seki S, Mazur P. The dominance of warming rate over cooling rate in the survival of mouse oocytes subjected to a vitrification procedure. Cryobiology. 2009;59:75–82.
Trounson A, Mohr L. Human pregnancy following cryopreservation, thawing and transfer of an eight-cell embryo. Nature. 1983;305:707–9.
Vajta G, Nagy ZP. Are programmable freezers still needed in the embryo laboratory? Review on vitrification. Reprod Biomed Online. 2006;12:779–96.
Valojerdi MR, Salehnia M. Developmental potential and ultrastructural injuries of metaphase II (MII) mouse oocytes after slow freezing or vitrification. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2005;22:119–27.
Vanderzwalmen P, Ectors F, Grobet L, Prapas Y, Panagiotidis Y, Vanderzwalmen S, Stecher A, Frias P, Liebermann J, Zech NH. Aseptic vitrification of blastocysts from infertile patients, egg donors and after IVM. Reprod Biomed Online. 2009;19:700–7.
Yamanaka M, Hashimoto S, Amo A, Ito-Sasaki T, Abe H, Morimoto Y. Developmental assessment of human vitrified-warmed blastocysts based on oxygen consumption. Hum Reprod. 2011;26:3366–71.
Yokota Y, Sato S, Yokota M, Ishikawa Y, Makita M, Asada T, Araki Y. Successful pregnancy following blastocyst vitrification: case report. Hum Reprod. 2000;15:1802–3.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Drs. Keijiro Ito, Tomoko Inoue, Kazuhiro Saeki, and Nobuhiro Kato, and Ms. Yoshie Akamatsu for their technical support and valuable suggestions.
Funding
Part of this work was supported by a grant from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JPS-RFTF 23580397 to S.H.).
Conflict of interest
None declared.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Capsule
The closed vitrification system overcame the majority of problems associated with direct liquid nitrogen contact that occurs in the open vitrification system without impairing developmental competence of human embryos.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hashimoto, S., Amo, A., Hama, S. et al. A closed system supports the developmental competence of human embryos after vitrification. J Assist Reprod Genet 30, 371–376 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-012-9928-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-012-9928-2