Advertisement

Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics

, Volume 29, Issue 4, pp 331–334 | Cite as

Effect of male age on the outcome of in vitro fertilization: oocyte donation as a model

  • Longjie Gu
  • Hanwang Zhang
  • Li Yin
  • Zhiqin Bu
  • Guijin Zhu
ASSISTED REPRODUCTION TECHNOLOGIES

Abstract

Purpose

To assess the influence of male age on the outcome of oocyte donation cycles.

Materials and methods

A total 103 oocyte donation cycles of 70 couples (male aged 26 to 57) were examined, all of which were performed with conventional in vitro fertilization using fresh ejaculation sperm. Main outcome measures were fertilization rate, clinical pregnancy, live birth rates and pregnancy loss.

Results

A total 122 cryopreserved embryo transfer were performed, resulting in 34 cycles resulted in clinical pregnancy and 27 live births. No significant correlation was found between male age and fertilization rate. No significant difference was found in male age between the patients who achieved clinical pregnancy and live birth and those who did not. All the pregnancy loss occurred in cycles where the male was older than 37, however, when the cycles were divided into two groups according to whether or not male age older than 37, no statistically significant difference was not found in pregnancy loss rate.

Conclusions

Aging of the male has no significant impact on fertilization, pregnancy or live birth in oocyte donation cycles, but may be associated with pregnancy loss.

Keywords

In vitro fertilization Live birth rate Male age Oocyte donation Pregnancy loss 

References

  1. 1.
    Dain L, Auslander R, Dirnfeld M. The effect of paternal age on assisted reproduction outcome. Fertil Steril. 2011;95:1–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sartorius GA, Nieschlag E. Paternal age and reproduction. Hum Reprod Updat. 2010;16:65–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brahem S, Mehdi M, Elghezal H, Saad A. The effects of male aging on semen quality, sperm DNA fragmentation and chromosomal abnormalities in an infertile population. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2011;28:425–32.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Duran EH, Dowling-Lacey D, Bocca S, Stadtmauer L, Oehninger S. Impact of male age on the outcome of assisted reproductive technology cycles using donor oocytes. Reprod BioMed Online. 2010;20:848–56.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Moskovtsev SI, Willis J, Mullen JB. Age-related decline in sperm deoxyribonucleic acid integrity in patients evaluated for male infertility. Fertil Steril. 2006;85:496–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    World Health Organization. WHO laboratory manual for the examination of human semen and sperm-cervical mucus interaction. 4th ed. Cambridge, UK, Published on behalf of the World Health Organization by Cambridge University Press; 1999.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zegers-Hochschild F, Adamson GD, de Mouzon J, Ishihara O, Mansour R, Nygren K, Sullivan E, van der Poel S, International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technology; World Health Organization. The International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technology (ICMART) and the World Health Organization (WHO) revised glossary on ART terminology, 2009. Hum Reprod. 2009;24:2683–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gallardo E, Simon C, Levy M, Guanes PP, Remohi J, Pellicer A. Effect of age on sperm fertility potential: oocyte donation as a model. Fertil Steril. 1996;66:260–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Paulson RJ, Milligan RC, Sokol RZ. The lack of influence of age on male fertility. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;184:818–24.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Whitcomb BW, Turzanski-Fortner R, Richter KS, Kipersztok S, Stillman RJ, Levy MJ, Levens ED. Contribution of male age to outcomes in assisted reproductive technologies. Fertil Steril. 2011;95:147–51.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Campos I, Gomez E, Fernandez-Valencia AL, Landeras J, Gonzalez R, Coy P, Gadea J. Effect of men and recipients’ age on the reproductive outcome of an oocyte donation program. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2008;25:445–52.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Luna M, Finkler E, Barritt J, Bar-Chama N, Sandler B, Copperman AB, Granfeld L. Paternal age and assisted reproductive technology outcome in ovum recipients. Fertil Steril. 2009;92:1772–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Frattarelli JL, Miller KA, Miller BT, Elkind-Hirsch K, Scott Jr RT. Male age negatively impacts embryo development and reproductive outcome in donor oocyte assisted reproductive technology cycles. Fertil Steril. 2008;90:97–103.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bhattacharya SM. Association of various sperm parameters with unexplained repeated early pregnancy loss–which is most important? Int Urol Nephrol. 2008;40:391–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gil-Villa AM, Cardona-Maya W, Agarwal A, Sharma R, Cadavid A. Assessment of sperm factors possibly involved in early recurrent pregnancy loss. Fertil Steril. 2010;94:1465–72.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Longjie Gu
    • 1
  • Hanwang Zhang
    • 1
  • Li Yin
    • 1
  • Zhiqin Bu
    • 1
  • Guijin Zhu
    • 1
  1. 1.Reproductive Medicine Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical CollegeHuazhong University of Science and TechnologyWuhanPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations