Skip to main content
Log in

Density gradient centrifugation before or after magnetic-activated cell sorting: which technique is more useful for clinical sperm selection?

  • Technical Innovations
  • Published:
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Although, at present, the selection of sperm prior to ICSI is based on motility and morphology, undetectable anomalies, and more importantly damaged DNA are overlooked. In this regard, novel sperm selection procedures have gained much interest. For instance, sperm has been selected by Magnetic-Activated Cell Sorting (MACS) based on early apoptotic marker, the externalization of phosphatidylserine (EPS). Review of the literature has revealed that the efficiency of this technique has been mainly evaluated post Density Gradient Centrifugation (DGC). Therefore, there is a need to prove the efficiency of this technique independent of DGC. In addition, considering the fact that DGC induces EPS due to capacitation and acrosome reaction, therefore, the role of MACS before DGC(MACS-DGC) and MACS after DGC (DGC-MACS) should be assessed.

Methods

Semen samples from fifteen infertile men were divided into three separate fractions: control, DGC, and MACS. To carry out DGC-MACS, DGC samples were further divided into two fractions and MACS was carried on the second fractions. Similarly to carry out MACS-DGC, the MACS samples were further divided into two fractions and DGC was carried on the second fractions. Percentages of sperm with normal morphology, DNA fragmentation, protamine deficiency, EPS and caspase-3 activity were determined in each fraction.

Results

DGC is more efficient than MACS in separating intact sperm only in terms of normal morphology, DNA and chromatin integrity but not for active caspase. However, a combination of these procedures was more efficient than a single procedure to separate intact sperm for the aforementioned parameters. Comparison of the combined procedures showed only higher efficiency to separate active caspase in the MACS-DGC group.

Conclusion

Based on these results, we propose MACS-DGC rather than DGC-MACS to be implemented in clinical settings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Paasch U, Grunewald S, Glander HJ. Sperm selection in assisted reproductive techniques. Soc Reprod Fertil Suppl. 2007;65:515–25.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Benchaib M, Lornage J, Mazoyer C, Lejeune H, Salle B, Franc, et al. Sperm deoxyribonucleic acid fragmentation as a prognostic indicator of assisted reproductive technology outcome. Fertil Steril. 2007;87:93–100.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhang HB, Lu SM, Ma CY, Wang L, Li X, Chen ZJ. Early apoptotic changes in human spermatozoa and their relationships with conventional semen parameters and sperm DNA fragmentation. Asian J Androl. 2008;10:227–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bakos HW, Thompson JG, Feil D, Lane M. Sperm DNA damage is associated with assisted reproductive technology pregnancy. Int J Androl. 2008;31:518–26.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Nasr-Esfahani MH, Razavi S, Vahdati AA, Fathi F, Tavalaee M. Evaluation of sperm selection procedure based on hyaluronic acid binding ability on ICSI outcome. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2008;25:197–203.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kheirollahi-Kouhestani M, Razavi S, Tavalaee M, Deemeh MR, Mardani M, Moshtaghian J, et al. Selection of sperm based on combined density gradient and Zeta method may improve ICSI outcome. Hum Reprod. 2009;24:2409–16.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Razavi SH, Nasr-Esfahani MH, Deemeh MR, Shayesteh M, Tavalaee M. Evaluation of zeta and HA-binding methods for selection of spermatozoa with normal morphology, protamine content and DNA integrity. Andrologia. 2010;42:13–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Said TM, Agarwal A, Grunewald S, Rasch M, Glander HJ, Paasch U. Evaluation of sperm recovery following annexin V magnetic-activated cell sorting separation. Reprod BioMed Online. 2006;13:336–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Glander HJ, Schaller J. Binding of annexin V to plasma membranes of human spermatozoa: a rapid assay for detection of membrane changes after cryostorage. Mol Hum Reprod. 1999;5:109–15.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Said T, Agarwal A, Grunewald S, Rasch M, Baumann T, Kriegel C, et al. Selection of nonapoptotic spermatozoa as a new tool for enhancing assisted reproduction outcomes: an in-vitro model. Biol Reprod. 2006;74:530–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Aziz N, Said T, Paasch U, Agarwal A. The relationship between human sperm apoptosis, morphology and the sperm deformity index. Hum Reprod. 2007;22:1413–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Grunewald S, Baumann T, Paasch U, Glander HJ. Capacitation and acrosome reaction in nonapoptotic human spermatozoa. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2006;1090:138–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Dirican EK, Ozgün OD, Akarsu S, Akin KO, Ercan O, Uğurlu M, et al. Outcome of magnetic activated cell sorting of non-apoptotic spermatozoa before density gradient centrifugation for assisted reproduction. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2008;25:375–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Martin SJ, Reutelingsperger CP, McGahon AJ, Rader JA, van Schie RC, LaFace DM, et al. Early redistribution of plasma membrane phosphatidylserine is a general feature of apoptosis regardless of initiating stimulus: inhibition by overexpression of Bcl-2 and Abl. J Exp Med. 1995;182:1545–56.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Gadella BM, Harrison RA. Capacitation induces cyclic adenosine 3′,5′-monophosphate-dependent, but apoptosis-unrelated, exposure of aminophospholipids at the apical head plasma membrane of boar sperm cells. Biol Repro. 2002;67:340–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Salicioni AM, Platt MD, Wertheimer EV, Arcelay E, Allaire A, Sosnik J, et al. Signalling pathways involved in sperm capacitation. Soc Reprod Fertil Suppl. 2007;65:245–59.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. World Health Organization. Examination and processing human semen. 5th ed. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Tavalaee M, Razavi S, Nasr-Esfahani MH. Influence of sperm chromatin anomalies on assisted reproductive technology outcome. Fertil Steril. 2009;91:1119–26.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Hoogendijk CF, Kruger TF, Bouic PJ, Henkel RR. A novel approach for the selection of human sperm using annexin V-binding and flow cytometry. Fertil Steril. 2009;91:1285–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bartke A. Apoptosis of male germ cells, a generalized or a cell type-specific phenomenon? Endocrinol. 1995;136:3–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Sakkas D, Mariethoz E, St John JC. Abnormal sperm parameters in humans are indicative of an abortive apoptotic mechanism linked to the Fas-mediated pathway. Exp Cell Res. 1999;251:350–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Arends MJ, Wyllie AH. Apoptosis: mechanisms and roles in pathology. Int Rev Exp Pathol. 1991;32:223–54.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Paasch U, Grunewald S, Fitzl G, Glander HJ. Deterioration of plasma membrane is associated with activated caspases in human spermatozoa. J Androl. 2003;24:246–52.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. De Vries KJ, Wiedmer T, Sims PJ, Gadella BM. Caspase-independent exposure of aminophospholipids and tyrosine phosphorylation in bicarbonate responsive human sperm cells. Biol Reprod. 2003;68:2122–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Muratori M, Porazzi I, Luconi M, Marchiani S, Forti G, Baldi E. AnnexinV binding and merocyanine staining fail to detect human sperm capacitation. J Androl. 2004;25:797–810.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Martin G, Sabido O, Durand P, Levy R. Phosphatidylserine externalization in human sperm induced by calcium ionophore A23187: relationship with apoptosis, membrane scrambling and the acrosome reaction. Hum Reprod. 2005;20:3459–68.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Barroso G, Taylor S, Morshedi M, Manzur F, Gavino F, Oehninger S. Mitochondrial membrane potential integrity and plasma membrane translocation of phosphatidylserine as early apoptotic markers: a comparison of two different sperm populations. Fertil Steril. 2006;85:149–54.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Grunewald S, Reinhardt M, Blumenauer V, Said TM, Agarwal A, Abu Hmeidan F, et al. Increased sperm chromatin decondensation in selected nonapoptotic spermatozoa of patients with male infertility. Fertil Steril. 2009;92:572–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors express their gratitude to the Royan Institute for its financial support, as well as to the staff of Isfahan Fertility and Infertility Center.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. H. Nasr-Esfahani.

Additional information

Capsule

The results of this study show that for sperm preparation or sperm selection, magnateic-activated cell sorting (MACS) should be carried out before Density gradient centrifugation (DGC) and not after.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tavalaee, M., Deemeh, M.R., Arbabian, M. et al. Density gradient centrifugation before or after magnetic-activated cell sorting: which technique is more useful for clinical sperm selection?. J Assist Reprod Genet 29, 31–38 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-011-9686-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-011-9686-6

Keywords

Navigation