Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics

, Volume 28, Issue 2, pp 101–106 | Cite as

The effect of age on in vitro fertilization outcome: is too young possible?

  • Zohreh Nazemian
  • Navid Esfandiari
  • Murid Javed
  • Robert F. CasperEmail author
Assisted Reproduction Technologies



The negative correlation between fecundity and age in women has been extensively documented although data on reproductive performance in very young women is sparse. The objective of this study was to determine whether age ≤25 years has an impact on reproductive outcome in women undergoing IVF-ET.


IVF outcome in 85 infertility patients aged 19–25 years was compared to that in 69 infertility patients aged 30–35 years. Primary outcomes included fertilization rates and embryo quality. Secondary outcomes were clinical pregnancy and miscarriage rates.


The young patients (≤25 years) demonstrated a lower fertilization rate, and reduced number of top quality embryos. Although clinical pregnancy, and implantation rates were similar to their older counterparts (30–35 years), the young women had a significantly higher miscarriage rate.


Our results demonstrating poorer reproductive performance in very young patients were surprising and need further investigation.


In vitro fertilization Young patients Pregnancy Egg donor Reproductive outcome 


  1. 1.
    Bentov Y, Esfandiari N, Burstein E, Casper RF. The use of mitochondrial nutrients to improve the outcome of infertility treatment in older patients. Fertil Steril. 2010;93(1):272–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Munné S, Sandalinas M, Magli C, Gianaroli L, Cohen J, Warburton D. Increased rate of aneuploid embryos in young women with previous aneuploid conceptions. Prenat Diagn. 2004;24(8):638–43.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fragouli E, Escalona A, Gutiérrez-Mateo C, Tormasi S, Alfarawati S, Sepulveda S, et al. Comparative genomic hybridization of oocytes and first polar bodies from young donors. Reprod Biomed Online. 2009;19(2):228–37.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rodríguez-González M, Serra V, Garcia-Velasco JA, Pellicer A, Remohí J. The “vanishing embryo” phenomenon in an oocyte donation programme. Hum Reprod. 2002;17(3):798–802.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    World Health Organization. WHO laboratory manual for the examination of human sperm and semen-cervical mucus interaction. 4th ed. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1999.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Casper RF, Meriano JS, Jarvi KA, Cowan L, Lucato ML. The hypo-osmotic swelling test for selection of viable sperm for intracytoplasmic sperm injection in men with complete asthenozoospermia. Fertil Steril. 1996;65(5):972–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jurisicova A, Varmuza S, Casper RF. Programmed cell death and human embryo fragmentation. Mol Hum Reprod. 1996;2:93–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ziebe S, Lundin K, Loft A, Bergh C. Nyboe Andersen A, Selleskog U, et al. FISH analysis for chromosomes 13, 16, 18, 21, 22, X and Y in all blastomeres of IVF pre-embryos from 144 randomly selected donated human oocytes and impact on pre-embryo morphology. Hum Reprod. 2003;18:2575–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wilding M, Di Matteo L, Dale B. The maternal age effect: a hypothesis based on oxidative phosphorylation. Zygote. 2005;13(4):317–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bartmann AK, Romão GS, Ramos Eda S, Ferriani RA. Why do older women have poor implantation rates? A possible role of the mitochondria. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2004;21(3):79–83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Simón C, Cano F, Valbueña D, Remohí J, Pellicer A. Clinical evidence for a detrimental effect on uterine receptivity of high serum oestradiol concentrations in high and normal responder patients. Hum Reprod. 1995;10:2432–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Valbuena D, Martin J, de Pablo JL, Remohí J, Pellicer A, Simón C. Increasing levels of estradiol are deleterious to embryonic implantation because they directly affect the embryo. Fertil Steril. 2001;76:962–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chun SY, Hsueh AJ. Paracrine mechanisms of ovarian follicle apoptosis. J Reprod Immunol. 1998;39(1–2):63–75.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nelson JR, Feinman M, Wilcox J, Batzofin J. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis in embryos created from oocyte donation. Fertil Steril 2001 pp. S76 ASRM abstract.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Munné S, Ary J, Zouves C, Escudero T, Barnes F, Cinioglu C, et al. Wide range of chromosome abnormalities in the embryos of young egg donors. Reprod Biomed Online. 2006;12(3):340–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zohreh Nazemian
    • 1
    • 2
  • Navid Esfandiari
    • 1
    • 2
  • Murid Javed
    • 1
  • Robert F. Casper
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Toronto Centre for Advanced Reproductive Technology (TCART)University of TorontoTorontoCanada
  2. 2.Division of Reproductive Sciences, Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity of TorontoOntarioCanada

Personalised recommendations